Overview

Title

An Act To amend the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act to adjust the boundary of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 2042 is a new rule that changes how big a special nature area called Sloan Canyon is, making it bigger. It also lets a company build water pipes near the area, but they have to be careful not to harm the nature there.

Summary AI

S. 2042 aims to amend the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act by updating the boundaries of the Conservation Area with a new map, increasing the total acreage from 48,438 to 57,728 acres. The bill grants rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for constructing and operating water pipeline facilities outside the Conservation Area. It also ensures that existing utility corridors and rights-of-way are preserved while implementing the new boundary adjustments, and includes measures to protect the conservation area resources during pipeline construction.

Published

2024-12-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Engrossed in Senate
Date: 2024-12-18
Package ID: BILLS-118s2042es

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,055
Pages:
8
Sentences:
22

Language

Nouns: 329
Verbs: 69
Adjectives: 31
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 55
Entities: 63

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
47.95
Token Entropy:
4.86
Readability (ARI):
25.59

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled the "Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act," aims to amend the existing Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act. Its primary focus is on adjusting the boundaries of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area to accommodate a new map dated June 7, 2023, which increases the acreage of the area. Additionally, it authorizes the Southern Nevada Water Authority to build and manage a water pipeline infrastructure. The bill also addresses the maintenance and establishment of utility corridors and rights-of-way within the conservation area.

Significant Issues

A number of concerns arise from the provisions of this bill. Firstly, the decision to grant various rights-of-way to the Southern Nevada Water Authority without requiring payments like rents could be seen as giving preferential treatment to this organization. This aspect raises both ethical and financial concerns, as it might set a precedent for other organizations seeking similar exemptions.

Moreover, the bill does not provide clear information regarding the environmental impact of constructing and operating water transmission facilities in the conservation area. Given the purpose of conservation, any construction within this area could potentially harm the environment, but the bill lacks clarity on how these concerns would be mitigated.

The allowance for the Authority to excavate and dispose of materials from pipeline tunneling without consideration could appear wasteful, especially if these materials have potential value. Additionally, the language stating that construction activities "shall not permanently adversely affect conservation area surface resources" is vague and can lead to different interpretations or legal disputes.

Lastly, the bill's language on preserving transmission and utility corridors is complex, making it challenging for the general public to comprehend the full implications on land use and environmental protections.

Public Impact

Broadly, if enacted, the bill could expand conservation efforts by increasing the protected area of Sloan Canyon. However, by facilitating the construction of a water pipeline, it might also pose risks to the natural environment within the expanded boundaries. The public could experience both benefits, such as improved water infrastructure and supply, and drawbacks, like the potential environmental degradation of a protected area.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the Southern Nevada Water Authority, this bill could be highly beneficial as it grants them significant rights and access to build essential water infrastructure without financial charges. This could enhance their ability to serve the local population effectively. Conversely, environmental groups might view the bill negatively, as the construction could compromise the integrity of a conservation area meant to protect natural resources and ecosystems.

Local residents near the expanded conservation area might witness both positive impacts, like increased conservation land and associated recreational opportunities, and negative ones, such as changes in their local environment due to the construction activities.

Overall, the bill presents a complex balance between infrastructure development and environmental conservation, and these issues require careful examination to ensure that stakeholder interests are addressed without compromising the conservation aims of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area.

Issues

  • The amendment granting the Southern Nevada Water Authority various rights-of-way without requiring the payment of rents or other charges (Section 3, subsection b) could be perceived as favoritism towards this organization, raising ethical and financial concerns about preferential treatment.

  • The potential environmental impact of constructing and operating water transmission and related facilities in the Conservation Area is not clarified (Section 3, subsection b), which could be significant given that conservation is the stated purpose of the area.

  • The provision allowing the Authority to excavate and dispose of materials from the tunneling of the water pipeline without consideration (Section 3, subsection b) could be perceived as wasteful if the extracted materials have economic value.

  • The phrase 'shall not permanently adversely affect conservation area surface resources' (Section 3, subsection b) is vague and open to interpretation, leading to potential legal disputes over the environmental impact of construction activities.

  • The bill's language regarding the preservation of transmission and utility corridors and rights-of-way (Section 3, subsection c) is complex, which could make it difficult for the general public to understand the implications on land use and environmental protection.

  • There is no explanation of potential changes in obligations or management related to the conservation area due to its boundary adjustment (Section 3), creating uncertainty about future regulatory and environmental management practices.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill gives it its official name, which is the "Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act".

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms used in the Act. "Conservation Area" refers to the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area, and "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior who is working through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.

3. Sloan canyon national conservation area boundary adjustment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes changes to the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area's boundaries by updating the map reference and increasing the total acreage. It also authorizes the Southern Nevada Water Authority to construct and operate water pipeline infrastructure, with specific conditions to protect conservation resources, and ensures that existing rights-of-way for utilities are maintained.