Overview
Title
To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to authorize expenditures for the conduct of certain water conservation measures in the Great Salt Lake basin, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 1955 is a bill that lets people spend money to save and use water wisely near the Great Salt Lake without messing up other important projects, making sure everything still follows the original plan.
Summary AI
S. 1955 is a bill that seeks to amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act. The goal is to allow money to be spent on water conservation efforts in the Great Salt Lake basin. The bill includes rules to make sure these efforts don't interfere with the completion of other projects under the Act. It also ensures that these efforts comply with existing plans.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, known as the "Great Salt Lake Stewardship Act," aims to amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to authorize spending on water conservation measures within the Great Salt Lake basin. Introduced by Senator Lee and co-sponsored by Senator Romney, the bill seeks to leverage existing, unspent funds to support these conservation efforts. The legislation specifies that any actions taken should be consistent with an existing plan, referred to as the Definite Plan Report, and ensures that conservation efforts should not disrupt other ongoing projects under the act.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key concern raised by the bill relates to the use of "any unexpended budget authority," which is not well-defined within the text. This lack of clarity creates potential for misinterpretation or misuse of funds, leading to financial and legal implications. Furthermore, the bill states that conservation measures will be considered compliant with the Definite Plan Report without providing detailed information about the contents or accessibility of this report. This presumption may sidestep essential oversight and reduce transparency and accountability in executing conservation efforts.
Another issue is the vague assurance that conservation measures will not interfere with the ongoing project completion. The mechanisms by which the Secretary will ensure this compliance are not specified, leaving room for execution ambiguities.
Impact on the Public
In general, water conservation efforts like those proposed can have a positive environmental impact, particularly in areas experiencing stress on their natural water resources, such as the Great Salt Lake basin. Efforts to enhance water conservation can lead to improved water availability and quality for local communities and ecosystems. However, the lack of clarity in financial allocations and oversight mechanisms risks undermining public trust in how funds are managed and used.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local Communities and Environmental Stakeholders: Improved water conservation efforts can benefit local communities dependent on the Great Salt Lake for water supply and recreation. Environmentalists may view this as a positive step towards ensuring the ecological health of the area.
Government Agencies and Officials: Agencies tasked with executing these measures might face challenges due to the bill's ambiguity, potentially leading to inefficiencies in project execution. Oversight bodies may also find it difficult to monitor compliance without clear definitions and allocations of the unexpended funds.
Lawmakers and Policy Analysts: The potential for misallocation of funds and the lack of transparency may call for further scrutiny and amendments. Lawmakers will need to consider these issues to strengthen accountability and ensure effective implementation of the bill's objectives.
In conclusion, while the bill embodies a crucial initiative for environmental stewardship, successful implementation requires addressing the highlighted issues of budget clarity, oversight, and execution to ensure the intended benefits are achieved and sustained.
Issues
The allowance for the Secretary to use 'any unexpended budget authority' without clear limitations or specified allocations raises potential issues of misuse or misallocation of funds. This concern affects both Section 2 and Section 213, posing financial and legal implications.
The language indicating that any water conservation measure 'shall be considered to be compliant with the Definite Plan Report' may sidestep necessary oversight, and it assumes that the contents and implications of such a report are well-known. This potentially reduces transparency and accountability, impacting both Section 2 and Section 213.
The lack of clear definition for the term 'unexpended budget authority' creates ambiguity in understanding what funds are available, which can result in financial misinterpretations in Section 213.
Section 213 presumes the existence and accessibility of the Definite Plan Report without providing details on its contents or access, potentially limiting transparency and the public’s or stakeholders' ability to understand compliance requirements.
The bill does not specify how the Secretary will ensure water conservation measures do not interfere with completing the project, leading to execution ambiguities. This issue impacts Section 213 and raises concerns about effective project management.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill is officially named the “Great Salt Lake Stewardship Act.”
2. Water conservation measures in the Great Salt Lake basin Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section adds new water conservation measures in the Great Salt Lake basin. It allows the Secretary to use unspent funds specifically for this purpose and ensures that these conservation efforts align with existing plans and do not disrupt ongoing projects.
213. Water conservation measures in the Great Salt Lake basin Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is allowed to use leftover funds to carry out water conservation efforts in the Great Salt Lake area, as long as these efforts comply with a specific report and don't hinder the completion of ongoing projects.