Overview
Title
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide explicit authority for the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to work with international partners on cybersecurity, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 1862 is a bill that wants to let some U.S. security people work with other countries to keep computers safe from bad guys, making sure this doesn't cause any problems at home.
Summary AI
S. 1862 is a bill that seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to give clear authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to collaborate with international partners on cybersecurity matters. The bill allows for the assignment of Homeland Security personnel to foreign locations, subject to the agreement of the Secretary of State, to support cybersecurity missions. Additionally, it permits providing foreign governments and organizations with cybersecurity assistance, equipment, and expertise, as long as these efforts align with U.S. homeland security interests and are approved by the Secretary of State. The bill also contains provisions ensuring that these activities do not infringe upon the authority of the Secretary of State and include limitations to prevent interference in U.S. domestic affairs, such as election meddling or surveillance of U.S. citizens.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, known as the "DHS International Cyber Partner Act of 2023," seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The primary aim of this bill is to grant explicit authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to work collaboratively with international partners on cybersecurity and infrastructure security missions. It enables the assignment of personnel to foreign locations and allows for the provision of cybersecurity-related support to international entities when it is deemed to further the homeland security interests of the United States.
General Summary
The bill focuses on enhancing cybersecurity collaboration with international partners. It allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to deploy personnel abroad, with the agreement of the Secretary of State, to fulfill the Department's missions. The bill also permits the provision of technical support and advice on cybersecurity to foreign governments and international organizations. Additionally, it provides for financial reimbursement for services where applicable, ensuring that funds are allocated effectively towards securing the interests of the homeland.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several notable concerns with this bill:
Lack of Specific Criteria: The bill does not outline specific criteria or guidelines for the deployment of personnel to international locations. This vagueness could lead to arbitrary assignments and unchecked costs. Assignments may be made without clear objectives or oversight, potentially leading to inefficiency and resource misuse.
Ambiguity in Financial Management: While the bill allows for reimbursement from foreign entities for services rendered, it lacks specific guidelines or limits on how these reimbursements should be processed and accounted for. Without proper financial tracking, there is a risk of financial mismanagement.
Enforcement and Accountability: The bill fails to establish enforcement mechanisms or penalties for potential violations, such as censoring U.S. citizens or interfering with elections. This lack of clear enforcement mechanisms could pose significant ethical and legal concerns.
Potential Bureaucratic Delays: The need for concurrence from the Secretary of State and the Chief of Mission could potentially lead to bureaucratic delays and inter-agency conflicts. These procedural hurdles could hinder prompt action when responding to international cybersecurity threats.
Ethical and Equity Concerns: Providing assistance to foreign governments without reimbursement could result in perceived favoritism or unequal distribution of resources, raising questions about fairness and equity in the use of U.S. resources.
Implications for the Public
Broadly, if successfully implemented, the bill could potentially strengthen the cybersecurity posture of the United States by fostering international cooperation and addressing cross-border cyber threats more effectively. However, the lack of specific guidelines and oversight measures might lead to inefficiencies, increased costs, and concerns over privacy and civil liberties.
Impact on Stakeholders
Government and Agencies: The ability to deploy personnel internationally and engage directly with foreign entities on cybersecurity matters could enhance the operational capabilities of homeland security agencies. However, without clear oversight mechanisms, this could also result in administrative and operational challenges.
International Partners: Foreign governments and international organizations stand to benefit from increased cybersecurity support from the U.S. This could improve their cybersecurity protocols and infrastructure, furthering collective global cybersecurity efforts.
U.S. Citizens: The bill raises potential privacy concerns, especially regarding the prohibition on surveillance and censorship activities. Without stringent enforcement measures, citizens might be wary of potential overreach or misuse of the authority granted by the bill.
Overall, while the bill has the potential to enhance U.S. efforts in global cybersecurity, its implementation requires careful consideration of oversight, financial management, and equitable distribution of resources to ensure the intended benefits are fully realized without unintended negative consequences.
Issues
The bill allows for the assignment of Department of Homeland Security personnel to foreign locations without specifying criteria, goals, or limits for these assignments (Section 2, Section 3, Section 104). This could lead to wasteful or unchecked spending and raises concerns about the ambiguity and lack of oversight or accountability measures in place.
The bill permits the assignment of personnel and provision of assistance to foreign entities without clear guidelines or a mechanism for oversight and accountability (Section 3, Section 104). This can lead to potential misuse or misallocation of resources, resulting in unnecessary or excessive international deployments.
The bill authorizes the collection of payments from foreign entities for services provided by CISA but lacks clear limits or guidelines on reimbursement and financial tracking (Section 4). This could lead to financial mismanagement and unchecked expenditures.
The language regarding the term 'further the homeland security interests of the United States' is vague and could lead to differing interpretations and inconsistent application (Section 3, Section 104, Section 4). This lack of specificity may result in legal and operational ambiguities.
The bill lacks enforcement mechanisms or penalties for potential violations, such as censoring citizens or interfering with elections (Section 5). This could lead to ethical and legal concerns about the protection of civil liberties.
The requirement for concurrence with the Secretary of State and Chief of Mission for international assignments may cause bureaucratic delays and potential inter-agency conflicts (Section 3, Section 104). This could result in operational inefficiencies.
The bill's provisions for providing assistance to foreign governments without reimbursement could lead to favoritism or unfair advantages to certain entities (Section 3, Section 104). This raises ethical concerns about equitable distribution of U.S. resources and support.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that the official short title for the document is the “DHS International Cyber Partner Act of 2023”.
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this Act is to give the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to send personnel to other countries to help carry out the Department's missions.
3. International assignment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 allows the Secretary of Homeland Security, with approval from the Secretary of State, to assign department personnel to international locations for cybersecurity and infrastructure security missions, ensuring their activities align with the authority of the Secretary of State and the chief of mission to that foreign country. Additionally, the amendment clarifies that this does not change the powers of the Secretary of State or any other federal officers.
104. International assignment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Homeland Security can send department staff to work in other countries if needed for cybersecurity and infrastructure security missions, with the agreement of the Secretary of State and cooperation of the local U.S. embassy. These assignments must align with the roles of U.S. diplomatic missions, but this does not change the Secretary of State's existing authority.
4. CISA Activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to allow Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) operations outside the United States, promote international partnerships in cyber planning, and establish authority for agreements with foreign entities to improve global cooperation in homeland security. It also allows reimbursement for services provided and ensures funds are used to support security interests.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In SECTION 1, the Act is given the official title “DHS International Cyber Partner Act of 2023.”
2. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this Act is to allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to send staff to other countries to help with the Department's goals and to offer advice and support on cybersecurity and infrastructure security to foreign governments and international organizations.
3. International assignment and assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill allows the Secretary of Homeland Security, with agreement from the Secretary of State, to assign personnel outside the U.S. for cybersecurity and infrastructure missions and to provide related support to foreign governments and organizations. The section also specifies guidelines for this international assistance, ensuring it's for defensive purposes only, and outlines reporting requirements to Congress.
104. International assignment and assistance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the Secretary, with the Secretary of State's agreement, to assign Department personnel overseas and provide cybersecurity-related support to foreign entities if it benefits U.S. security interests. It also lays out rules for reporting to Congress on these activities and requires any assistance to focus on defensive capabilities, not offensive ones.
4. CISA Activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section revises the Homeland Security Act to enable the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to support cybersecurity and physical security efforts internationally, which includes potentially assigning personnel abroad and offering various forms of assistance. It also clarifies that CISA's planning can involve working with international partners and that its activities can occur outside the United States.
5. Limitations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited from using the authority given by the Act to: (1) censor any U.S. citizens, (2) surveil any U.S. citizens, or (3) interfere with elections in the U.S.