Overview

Title

To impose sanctions with respect to persons engaged in the import of petroleum from the Islamic Republic of Iran, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

S. 1829 is a plan to stop people from buying oil from Iran because it might help bad guys and cause trouble for the United States, and it wants to make sure they have enough money to do this properly, but they have to be careful not to spend the money unwisely.

Summary AI

S. 1829 aims to impose sanctions on individuals and entities involved in importing petroleum from Iran to curb activities that threaten U.S. national security and support terrorism. The bill outlines specific actions subject to sanctions, such as managing ports or vessels that transport Iranian oil and conducting significant transactions with Iran's petroleum sector. It also mandates reports on Iran's oil export practices and the impact of U.S. sanctions, while offering some exceptions for humanitarian aid, law enforcement, and UN agreements. Additionally, the bill seeks to address cyber threats and threats against U.S. officials related to these activities.

Published

2024-05-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Reported to Senate
Date: 2024-05-07
Package ID: BILLS-118s1829rs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
16
Words:
8,691
Pages:
44
Sentences:
131

Language

Nouns: 2,523
Verbs: 652
Adjectives: 420
Adverbs: 86
Numbers: 276
Entities: 428

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.24
Average Sentence Length:
66.34
Token Entropy:
5.34
Readability (ARI):
35.26

AnalysisAI

The bill under consideration, "Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act of 2024," proposes a series of sanctions to be imposed on individuals and entities involved in the import of petroleum from the Islamic Republic of Iran. These sanctions aim to limit Iran's capacity to fund destabilizing activities, including terrorism and the development of weapons of mass destruction. The bill outlines various definitions, policies, and administrative connections necessary for its implementation and enforcement.

Summary of the Bill

The legislation's primary goal is to cut off the financial resources of the Islamic Republic of Iran derived from the export of petroleum and petroleum products. By doing so, it aims to curtail Iran's ability to engage in perceived destabilizing activities, sponsor terrorism, and accumulate funds that might oppress its population. The bill stipulates sanctions on foreign persons significantly transacting with Iranian oil, involves conducting detailed reports on Iran’s petroleum exports, includes modifications to previous Acts related to shields for military objectives, and addresses cybersecurity and specific threats to U.S. officials.

Significant Issues

A critical issue with the bill is the broad definition of "knowingly," which might accuse individuals who should have known but did not have actual knowledge of any involvement. This could result in unintended liability, causing potential legal entanglements.

The policy statement in the bill lacks specificity regarding the execution details of its overarching goals, leaving room for misunderstanding the legislation's effectiveness and enforcement mechanisms. Moreover, the inclusion of both watercraft and aircraft under the term "vessel" might cause legal ambiguities that could complicate the law’s enforcement.

There's also a concern about determining what constitutes a "significant transaction" with Iranian petroleum products. The lack of a clear definition could lead to inconsistent or unfair application of sanctions.

The financial and logistical feasibility of requiring a comprehensive report within 120 days of enactment may present cost-effectiveness concerns and exert undue strain on administrative resources.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill is poised to impact global markets by potentially influencing oil prices due to restrictions on Iran's ability to distribute petroleum. These regulatory changes might affect consumer energy prices and consequently the cost of goods and services internationally, influencing household expenses.

However, the bill's key intent is to impact Iran’s financial channels and limit its capacity to engage in activities deemed harmful to international security. If successful, this could enhance global stability and security, thereby positively affecting international relations and economic conditions over the long term.

Stakeholders Affected

Governments: Countries with close economic ties to Iran or who depend significantly on Iranian petroleum could face economic pressures due to potential disruptions in their energy supplies.

International Relations: Allies and opponents of the U.S. might react to this unilateral action based on their own foreign policy objectives concerning Iran, leading to diplomatic negotiations or tensions.

Domestic Entities: U.S.-based businesses involved in international trade, particularly in the energy sector, could experience operational disruptions or increased market volatility due to the sanctions.

Iran: Directly, the Iranian government and its economic sectors would bear the brunt of these restrictions, potentially facing reduced revenues and economic hardships, which could compound existing economic challenges.

Human Rights: By explicitly aiming to limit Iran's potential to oppress its citizenry, the bill may indirectly support human rights improvements in the region.

Overall, while the bill has strategic objectives aligned with national and international security, it also possesses complexities and ambiguities that may require careful consideration and monitoring to ensure its effective implementation without unintended negative consequences.

Financial Assessment

Financial Summary and Allocations in the Bill

The bill mandates an appropriation of funds to support its implementation. Specifically, it authorizes $15,000,000 to be allocated to the Secretary of State for fiscal year 2025. This allocation is intended to increase resources and improve the modernization of infrastructure necessary for implementing sanctions.

Allocation and Resource Concerns

The appropriated $15,000,000 aims to enhance the Department of State's capabilities in implementing sanctions. This includes ensuring access to open-source databases, equipping relevant bureaus with technical resources to review classified information, and increasing personnel dedicated to these tasks. However, there's a valid concern regarding the detailed allocation of these funds. The bill does not specify how this amount will be distributed among the various needs it seeks to address, potentially leading to inefficient or wasteful use of resources. Section 9 outlines these objectives but lacks clear accountability measures, raising concerns about cost-effectiveness and transparency.

Relation to Identified Issues

One of the issues highlighted is the potential for financial inefficiency due to the lack of specific allocation or accountability measures for the $15,000,000 appropriated for sanctions implementation. Without detailed plans or breakdowns, there is a risk of financial wastefulness, which could undermine the effectiveness of the sanctions infrastructure. Furthermore, the requirement to produce an extensive report on Iran's petroleum exports as specified in Section 5 could pose financial and logistical challenges. Collecting the comprehensive data necessary for the report demands considerable resources, which could strain the allocated budget if not managed efficiently.

In summary, while the bill provides a substantial financial appropriation to support its provisions, the lack of specificity regarding the distribution and accountability of the $15,000,000 could lead to concerns about fiscal responsibility and the effective achievement of the bill’s objectives.

Issues

  • The definition of 'knowingly' in Section 2 is potentially too broad as it includes 'should have known,' leading to the risk of imposing liability on individuals without actual knowledge. This could have significant legal implications regarding fairness and responsibility.

  • Section 3's Statement of Policy is notably vague in describing how broad policy objectives like 'denying Iran funds' and 'sanctioning entities' will be effectively implemented or funded. The lack of specificity may cause political and legal ambiguity regarding the legislation's scope and efficacy.

  • The definition of 'vessel' in Section 2 includes both watercraft and aircraft, which traditionally do not fall under the same classification. This could cause legal confusion and debate, affecting enforcement and interpretation of the law in the transportation sector.

  • Section 4 presents ambiguity in defining what constitutes a 'significant transaction' for imposing sanctions, which could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent application of the law across different cases.

  • The exception clauses in Section 4, particularly subsection (c), allow for potential loopholes by broadly defining national security and intelligence exceptions, raising concerns over transparency and the potential misuse of these clauses for avoidance of sanctions.

  • Section 5, which mandates a comprehensive report on Iran's petroleum exports within 120 days, could be financially and logistically challenging due to the complexity and volume of data collection required. It raises concerns about cost-effectiveness and practicality.

  • The language in Section 7 regarding 'significant cyber-enabled activities' is vague and lacks concrete criteria, leading to possible overreach and indiscriminate application of sanctions, raising ethical and legal issues.

  • The waiver authority granted to the President in Section 8 allows considerable discretion to bypass sanctions based on the 'vital national security interests' clause. Without clear criteria, this could lead to inconsistent application and potential political manipulation.

  • Section 9 authorizes $15,000,000 for sanctions implementation resources without detailing specific allocation or accountability measures, which could lead to financial concerns regarding potential wasteful spending and inefficiency.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Act may be referred to by its short title, the “Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act of 2023.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the Act explains the meanings of various terms used throughout the document. It defines key terms such as "alien," "appropriate congressional committees," "family member," "foreign person," "foreign port," "knowingly," "material support," "United States person," and "vessel" to ensure clarity and consistency in interpreting the Act.

3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States aims to prevent Iran from carrying out harmful activities like terrorism and building dangerous weapons by restricting their export of oil. The policy also seeks to block Iran from accessing funds used to violate human rights, punishes those helping Iran's energy sector, and acknowledges Iran's support of terrorist groups as a threat to U.S. security.

4. Sanctions with respect to foreign persons that engage in certain transactions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines sanctions that the President must impose on foreign individuals or entities engaged in specific activities related to Iranian petroleum, such as operating ports that host prohibited vessels or conducting significant transactions involving Iranian oil. These sanctions can include blocking property transactions, visa restrictions, and penalties, but there are exceptions and waivers available for national security or international obligations.

5. Report on petroleum and petroleum product exports from Iran Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration to prepare a report for Congress within 120 days, detailing the increase in Iran's petroleum exports since 2018. The report must include data on export volumes and revenues, especially to China, along with details on labeling practices, involved individuals, vessels, and foreign ports; it should be publicly accessible, although a classified section may be included.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section titled "SECTION 1. Short title" in this Act specifies that the name of the law is the "Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act of 2024".

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines terms used in the act, such as "admission," "alien," and "lawfully admitted for permanent residence," which are aligned with the Immigration and Nationality Act; "appropriate congressional committees," referring to specific committees in the Senate and House; "foreign person" and "foreign port," which relate to non-U.S. individuals and ports outside the U.S.; "knowingly," having to do with awareness of actions; "United States person," covering U.S. citizens and certain entities; and "vessel," including watercraft or aircraft used for transportation on water.

3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States policy aims to prevent Iran from engaging in harmful activities like supporting terrorism and developing weapons of mass destruction by restricting its oil exports. It also intends to stop Iran from abusing its citizens, sanction those aiding Iran's energy sector, and counter Iran's support for foreign terrorist groups.

4. Sanctions with respect to foreign persons that engage in certain transactions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the sanctions the President must impose on foreign persons involved in significant transactions with Iranian petroleum products, such as operating ports or vessels connected to such activities. These sanctions include blocking property transactions, restricting U.S. entry, and prohibiting certain vessels from landing in U.S. ports, with potential waivers for national security interests. The sanctions expire four years after the Act’s enactment.

5. Report on petroleum and petroleum product exports from Iran Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Energy Information Administration to deliver a report to Congress within 120 days of the bill's enactment detailing Iran's petroleum exports, including revenue estimates and shipment details, especially concerning China. The report, which may contain classified parts, must be available on the Energy Information Administration's public website.

6. Modification and extension of Sanctioning the Use of Civilians as Defenseless Shields Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill revises the Sanctioning the Use of Civilians as Defenseless Shields Act by including members of Palestine Islamic Jihad who use civilians to shield military objectives, allowing Congress to request evaluations of foreign individuals for sanctions, defining "Palestine Islamic Jihad," and extending the act's expiration to December 31, 2030.

7. Confronting asymmetric and malicious cyber activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section allows the President to impose sanctions, such as travel bans and property blocks, on foreign persons involved in harmful cyber activities against the United States. It also requires the President to respond to congressional committee requests about such foreign persons and determine whether sanctions will be imposed.

8. Sanctions with respect to threats to current or former United States officials Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that 180 days after the enactment of the Act, the President must impose sanctions on foreign individuals involved in violence or threats against U.S. officials, including barring entry to the U.S. and blocking property transactions. The President can waive or terminate these sanctions if it's in the national security interest or if the person has changed behavior, and the sanction requirement will expire four years after the Act's enactment.

9. Resources for sanctions implementation at the Department of State Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the importance of having adequate resources for the Department of State to effectively implement sanctions, emphasizing the need for staffing, modernized infrastructure, and increased resources. It also mandates a report on improvement efforts and authorizes $15 million for these purposes for fiscal year 2025.

Money References

  • (d) Authorization of appropriation.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State for fiscal year 2025 $15,000,000 to carry out this section. ---

10. Exceptions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines exceptions to the sanctions imposed by the Act, specifying that the sanctions do not apply to importation of goods, compliance with United Nations agreements and U.S. law enforcement activities, intelligence activities, and humanitarian assistance like food and medical supplies. It clarifies that the Act does not limit the government’s existing ability to grant waivers or exceptions and requires an annual report detailing activities that would be punishable if not for these exceptions.

11. Report on impacts on the Islamic Republic of Iran of sanctions imposed by the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of State, with help from the Secretary of the Treasury and other experts, must submit a report within 90 days of the Act's enactment on how U.S. sanctions affect Iran. This report will look at the sanctions' effects on Iran's problematic activities, regime officials, civil society organizations, internet access, the Iranian people’s living standards, unofficial economies, and identify which Iranian industries are unaffected by these sanctions.