Overview
Title
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act and the Public Health Service Act to improve the reporting of abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 178 is a bill that asks states to tell the government more details about abortions to make sure the information is similar everywhere, but some people worry this might make people feel like they have less privacy.
Summary AI
S. 178, titled the "Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025," aims to improve how abortion data is reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The bill requires states to submit standardized abortion data for Medicaid payments related to family planning services, ensuring consistency and accuracy. It mandates that the CDC maintain a surveillance system to collect this data, which includes specific variables like maternal age, gestational age, and abortion method type. States are also required to certify the accuracy of submitted data, and the CDC will issue annual reports based on the collected information.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill titled the "Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025" seeks to amend existing legislation to improve the reporting of abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The driving force behind this bill is to standardize and make mandatory the reporting of abortion-related statistics from all U.S. states, intending to provide a more comprehensive dataset for public health and policy analysis.
General Summary of the Bill
This bill introduces requirements for states to collect and report detailed abortion data to the CDC. It emphasizes the necessity for uniformity in data collection across the United States to ensure comprehensive and accurate public health information. Key changes include making Medicaid payments for certain family planning services contingent on states submitting this data and detailing what information should be reported, such as maternal age, race, abortion method, and outcomes.
Significant Issues Addressed
One crucial issue the bill seeks to address is the lack of uniformity and completeness in current abortion data reporting. It notes existing practices are voluntary and inconsistent, leaving public health officials and policymakers with insufficient information. However, the bill also presents challenges, primarily centered around privacy concerns, potential legal challenges related to state compliance, and the ethical implications of the data variables required for collection.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly, the bill aims to enhance public health data quality, theoretically allowing for more informed policy decisions. By standardizing abortion data, diverse stakeholders, including researchers and health professionals, could gain access to valuable insights for addressing public health challenges.
However, the mandatory nature of data reporting could lead to conflicts with states that prioritize privacy or have strict regulations concerning reproductive health data. If states feel their privacy laws or resident rights are compromised, these conflicts might lead to legal challenges or resistance to compliance, potentially impacting Medicaid funding for family planning services.
Stakeholder Impact
For policymakers and public health organizations, this bill promises to provide a richer dataset, potentially leading to better-informed decision-making. Improved data accuracy and uniformity could facilitate targeted interventions and resource allocation.
Conversely, the bill may negatively affect individuals concerned about privacy, as extensive personal data collection could be perceived as intrusive. State governments might face logistical and financial burdens in adjusting their data collection systems to meet new federal requirements, particularly if their laws do not readily align with this legislation.
State relations with the federal government could be strained due to the bill's punitive aspects for non-compliance, such as withholding Medicaid payments. Penalizing states might have unintended consequences on public health funding and services at the local level, potentially affecting vulnerable populations dependent on state-provided family planning services.
In summary, while the bill aspires to improve public health data and insights, it also brings to the forefront significant privacy, ethical, and legal concerns that must be carefully navigated to achieve its goals without undue negative impact on stakeholders.
Issues
Section 3: The requirement for annual submission of abortion data to the CDC may lead to legal and privacy issues with states that have restrictive regulations regarding abortion data. The consequence of withholding Medicaid payments also poses potential legal challenges regarding federal-state relations.
Section 317W: The collection of extensive abortion data raises significant privacy concerns, particularly about data security and who will have access to this sensitive information, potentially affecting the rights and confidentiality of individuals.
Section 4 and Section 317W: The list of variables and requirements for cross-tabulation could be considered intrusive, leading to ethical debates about the nature and extent of personal information collected and the justification for such details in policy analysis.
Section 4: There is no clear outcome or intention for using the data to improve public health, which creates ambiguity in the purpose and benefits of this surveillance system, raising political and ethical considerations.
Section 3: The absence of specific consequences for states failing to submit data, aside from withholding payments, may lead to inconsistent compliance and varying interpretations, reducing the efficacy and equity of the legislation.
Section 317W: The enforcement timeline for annual reports appears unnecessarily long, which might affect the timeliness and relevance of published data, potentially reducing its utility for public health policy decisions.
Section 3: The vague language regarding 'knowingly' providing false information could complicate enforcement and lead to legal disputes between states and the federal government over interpretation and application of the law.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill provides its short title, which is the “Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that abortion data reporting has been inconsistent, as it has been voluntary, leading to incomplete information being submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). They note issues such as a lack of uniform data points across all states and the absence of reporting by some states, which affects public health and policy analysis.
3. Medicaid payments for certain family planning services and supplies contingent on submission of abortion data to CDC Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Social Security Act to require states to submit abortion data to the CDC as a condition for receiving Medicaid payments for family planning services. If a state submits false data, it risks losing these payments in the following fiscal year.
4. Collection of abortion data by CDC Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to collect and maintain standardized data on abortions across the United States. It outlines the specific data variables, such as maternal age, race, and abortion method, and requires annual reports to be published within three years.
317W. Abortion data Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section mandates that the Secretary of Health, through the CDC Director, maintain a system to collect and share abortion data from states in a standardized way. This includes creating worksheets with mandatory questions about variables like maternal age, abortion methods, and more, providing technical help to states, and producing an annual report on this data.