Overview
Title
To clarify the country of origin of certain articles imported into the United States for purposes of certain trade enforcement actions.
ELI5 AI
S. 172 is a plan to make sure the U.S. knows where some special toys and gadgets come from, especially if they might be from countries like China or Russia, to keep everyone safe and fair in trading.
Summary AI
S. 172 aims to clarify the rules around identifying the country of origin for certain goods imported into the United States, especially for trade enforcement actions. The bill targets articles linked to "foreign adversary countries," including China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela, subjecting these goods to specific trade actions as if they originated directly from these countries. It defines a "foreign adversary party" and sets criteria for when an entity is considered influenced or controlled significantly by such parties. The legislation is intended to enhance U.S. trade enforcement, particularly against nations seen as significant economic or security threats.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Stopping Adversarial Tariff Evasion Act" is legislation introduced in the United States Senate aimed at clarifying the criteria for identifying the country of origin for certain imported articles. This clarification is intended to enhance trade enforcement actions against foreign adversary countries. The bill specifically targets entities that are owned, controlled, or operated by these adversarial nations and ensures that the U.S. can apply trade actions as though the articles originate directly from these countries. Countries such as China, Russia, and Venezuela under Nicolás Maduro are explicitly identified as foreign adversaries. The bill amends existing trade laws to apply these criteria consistently across different sections concerning trade agreements, import injury, and national security.
Significant Issues
A critical issue with the proposed legislation is the broad definition of what constitutes an entity "owned, controlled, directed, or operated by a foreign adversary party." This definition could inadvertently include entities only marginally connected to these adversaries, making enforcement challenging. The fixed list of countries designated as foreign adversaries might not be able to swiftly adapt to geopolitical shifts or leadership changes, which could lead to outdated applications of the law. Additionally, the bill's provisions rely on external regulatory definitions that might change over time, potentially introducing enforcement inconsistencies.
The bill also includes vague terms, such as "entities substantively involved in the industrial policies or military-civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China," which could lead to divergent interpretations. Complex rules about equity interests and financial instruments may create loopholes, allowing some entities to obscure true ownership, further complicating enforcement.
Public and Stakeholder Impact
For the general public, this bill primarily concerns national security and economic protection from foreign adversary interference. By enforcing trade regulations more stringently against those countries, it may help safeguard domestic industries and employment. However, the broad definitions and complex criteria could become bureaucratic challenges that might stymie efficient enforcement.
Specific stakeholders such as multinational businesses and foreign investors might find the bill's measures imposing, as the expansive definitions of control and ownership could impact their operations and investment strategies. This could lead to increased compliance costs or re-evaluation of partnerships involving entities from designated foreign adversaries. Meanwhile, domestic industries might benefit from greater protection against unfair foreign competition, potentially leading to increased economic stability and growth in affected sectors.
Overall, while the bill aims to strengthen U.S. trade enforcement against illicit advantages gained by adversary countries, its broad criteria and potential inflexibility to adapt to geopolitical changes could pose significant challenges in effective implementation and fair compliance.
Issues
The definition of 'entity owned, controlled, directed, or operated by a foreign adversary party' is broad and could capture entities only tangentially related to a foreign adversary party. This has implications across Sections 2, 3, and 4, potentially leading to overreach and challenges in precise enforcement.
The specification of 'foreign adversary country' includes current geopolitical adversaries such as the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and Venezuela under Nicolás Maduro's presidency. This fixed list in Sections 2, 3, and 4 might not adapt to future changes in international relations.
The reliance on external definitions, such as 'control' from the Code of Federal Regulations, found in Sections 2, 3, and 4, introduces potential ambiguity if these regulations change after the bill is enacted, affecting the consistency of enforcement.
The inclusion of 'entities substantively involved in the industrial policies or military-civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China' in Sections 2, 3, and 4 is vague, making consistent enforcement challenging and possibly leading to disputes about what constitutes 'substantial involvement.'
Complex rules about equity interest and financial instruments create potential loopholes for circumvention by entities that can obscure true ownership or control. This is highlighted in Sections 2, 3, and 4 and could hinder enforcement and lead to legal disputes.
The determination process and criteria related to Venezuela based on Nicolás Maduro's presidency in Sections 2, 3, and 4 may lack a clear mechanism for timely updates in response to political changes, posing risks for outdated policy applications.
The legalistic and complex language used in defining terms like 'entity owned, controlled, directed, or operated by a foreign adversary party' in Sections 2, 3, and 4 may be difficult for the general public and smaller entities to understand, potentially leading to inadvertent non-compliance and confusion.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be called the “Stopping Adversarial Tariff Evasion Act.”
2. Clarification of country of origin criteria for enforcement action under trade agreements or in response to certain foreign trade practices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Trade Act of 1974 clarifies that the U.S. Trade Representative's actions can treat products made or assembled by foreign adversary countries or their controlled entities as originating from those countries. It defines key terms, identifying certain countries like China and Russia as foreign adversaries and outlining what constitutes control by these parties.
3. Clarification of country of origin criteria for enforcement action by President after determination of import injury Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill updates the criteria for how the President can take action against imports causing harm to U.S. industries, specifically targeting products from foreign adversarial countries or entities they control. It defines such countries as China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela (under Maduro's rule) and clarifies criteria for identifying entities connected to these nations.
4. Clarification of country of origin criteria for enforcement action to safeguard national security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to clarify that any items produced by or connected to certain foreign adversaries should be treated as if they come from those adversaries. It defines foreign adversaries as countries like China, Russia, and North Korea, among others, and outlines what it means for entities to be controlled by these adversaries.