Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a refundable child tax credit with monthly advance payment.
ELI5 AI
The "American Family Act" is like giving families with kids a special monthly allowance to help buy things they need. Families with younger kids get a little more money, and this helps make sure they have enough, especially when the kids are very small.
Summary AI
Senate Bill 1393, called the “American Family Act,” seeks to modify the Internal Revenue Code by establishing a refundable child tax credit with monthly advance payments. The bill proposes that families receive a monthly payment based on the age and number of children they have, with higher amounts for younger children under six. The bill outlines income thresholds for eligibility and provides adjustments for inflation. It also includes measures for determining eligibility, resolving conflicting claims, and coordinating with other jurisdictions like Puerto Rico and American Samoa.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "American Family Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to introduce a refundable child tax credit that is distributed as monthly advance payments. By making it easier for families to access critical funds on a more regular basis, the bill aims to provide financial support tailored to the presence of children within a household.
General Summary of the Bill
The American Family Act includes provisions for a monthly child tax credit, which is calculated based on a household's number of qualifying children under 18, the children's ages, and the household's income level. The monthly allowance varies, with adjustments based on a variety of factors such as the child's age and the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). The bill outlines detailed requirements for eligibility, rules for monthly payments, and coordination efforts regarding U.S. territories and possessions such as Puerto Rico and American Samoa.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns raised involves the bill's complexity. Sections, such as those detailing monthly payments and eligibility criteria, are written in legal and tax jargon that may be challenging for the average taxpayer to decipher. This complexity risks leading to misinterpretation and potential misuse.
Furthermore, the bill guarantees payments to U.S. possessions without stringent accountability measures. This lack of oversight could result in inequitable distribution of funds. The sections related to presumptive eligibility and adjudication of competing claims leave room for ambiguous interpretation, which could foster disputes.
Also troubling is the criteria surrounding MAGI thresholds. These criteria do not accommodate variations in regional costs of living or unique familial situations, which may result in disproportionate financial relief distribution. The bill also implements strict penalties for fraudulent claims, which might excessively penalize low-income taxpayers unaware of the intricacies of such provisions.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, the introduction of monthly child tax credits could offer substantial financial relief, assisting families more effectively in managing their monthly expenses. By providing continuous financial support, the bill seeks to reduce child poverty and improve the financial stability of households with children.
Nevertheless, the potential for misunderstanding the bill's complex language and eligibility requirements could limit its beneficial impact. Taxpayers unfamiliar with intricate tax codes may struggle to navigate the new system, possibly missing out on eligible benefits or unintentionally running afoul of regulations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Families with Children: Families caring for children stand to benefit the most from this bill, enjoying regular financial assistance through monthly credit payments. This could positively impact child welfare by providing reliable support for education, healthcare, and everyday expenses.
Low-Income Households: While low-income families might benefit from this boost in financial safety, they face the hardship of navigating the bill's complex stipulations, which could expose them to penalties or disqualifications.
Residents of U.S. Territories: The bill outlines payments to U.S. territories like American Samoa, potentially broadening financial support reach. However, without explicit accountability, there's the underlying risk of inequities in distribution that could affect how these territories benefit from the provisions.
Tax Administrators and Legal Practitioners: Increased administrative effort is anticipated to implement the bill's provisions effectively across varied jurisdictions. Layers of bureaucracy in executing these monthly payments could result in elevated operational costs, straining already burdened tax administration systems.
In conclusion, while the American Family Act aims to enhance financial support for families, especially those with low incomes, it brings forth complexities and potential inequities that need addressing to ensure it delivers its intended advantages broadly and equitably.
Financial Assessment
The "American Family Act," as outlined in Senate Bill 1393, introduces significant financial measures designed to support families through a refundable child tax credit with monthly advance payments. The purpose of these payments is to provide consistent financial assistance to families based on the number and ages of their children.
Financial Provisions in the Bill
One of the primary financial elements of this bill is the allocation of a monthly specified child allowance. The bill specifies that families with children over the age of 6 will receive $300 per month per child, while younger children will qualify the family for a higher amount of 120 percent more than $300, translating to $360 per month per child under age 6. This structure acknowledges the potentially higher costs associated with younger children.
Furthermore, a special provision increases assistance for families with newborns, offering a monthly payment of 800 percent of the defined allowance for children under 1 month old. Such measures are intended to provide immediate financial support during the early stages of a child's life when expenses are particularly heavy.
Related Issues
The income thresholds set for these benefits are another crucial aspect. For instance, the initial threshold amount is set at $150,000 for joint returns, $112,500 for other cases, and a secondary threshold of $400,000 for joint returns. This approach contributes significantly to how the legislation targets support to various income groups. However, these thresholds do not take into account variations in the cost of living across different regions, potentially leading to inequities (Section 24A(b)(2)).
One substantial point of concern is the bill's provisions regarding fraud and the intentional disregard of rules. These sections impose disallowance periods as punitive measures, which are lengthy—up to 120 months for fraud. Such harsh penalties may disproportionately affect lower-income families who might unintentionally violate tax rules, exacerbating their financial vulnerability (Section 24A(f)).
Financial Logistics and Jurisdictional Allocations
The bill also includes provisions for the coordination of these payments with U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and American Samoa. Notably, the U.S. government will increase payments to these areas to offset expenses incurred by mirroring this tax policy. Each will receive an additional $300,000 annually to manage and distribute these payments, reflecting Congress's intent to ensure consistent support across regions. However, this raises concerns regarding accountability and the lack of detailed reporting requirements, potentially leading to misuse of funds and inequitable distribution (Section 7527A(h)(3)).
Appropriations and Inflation Adjustments
In terms of adjusting to economic changes, the bill stipulates that the monthly child allowance and threshold amounts will be tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), starting in December 2025. Changes in the CPI will dictate increases to both the monthly benefit and the income thresholds, providing flexibility to adjust for inflation over time (Section 24A(b)(3)). While this is a forward-thinking measure, the reliance on the CPI also introduces volatility, as monthly CPI figures can fluctuate, potentially disrupting financial planning for families reliant on these credits.
Administrative Considerations
Administering these advance payments could involve higher administrative costs, with no specific measures outlined to streamline the process. There is a risk that inefficient administration will escalate government spending without effectively benefiting the targeted families (Section 7527A).
In conclusion, while the "American Family Act" proposes substantial financial support for families, particularly those with younger children, it introduces complexity and potential vulnerabilities in administration and oversight. The effectiveness and fairness of this legislative initiative will depend significantly on how anticipated issues and complications are addressed in practical implementation.
Issues
The language used in sections like 24A and 7527A is highly complex, making it difficult for average taxpayers to understand their eligibility and responsibilities under the law, which could lead to misunderstandings and misuse of the child tax credit provisions. [Section 24A, Section 7527A]
There is potential for wasteful spending as payments are guaranteed to possessions of the United States, such as American Samoa, without specific accountability or detailed reporting requirements on how the funds will be distributed or used, potentially leading to inequities. [Section 24A, Section 7527A(h)(3)]
The rules on 'fraud and intentional disregard of rules or regulations' result in strict and long disallowance periods which may be too punitive, especially for low-income households who might be unaware of certain regulations. This could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. [Section 24A(f)]
The criteria for modified adjusted gross income thresholds and reductions might not account for variations in regional cost of living or unique family circumstances, potentially creating inequities in credit distribution. [Section 24A(b)(2)]
Potential contentious disputes are foreseen in the 'tie-breaker rules' for determining which taxpayer a child is assigned to in cases of competing claims, without clear resolution mechanisms to manage them effectively. [Section 24A(c)(4)]
The section outlines multiple special cases without specifying clear operational guidelines, leading to inconsistencies in application, particularly in divorced parents and presumptive eligibility cases. [Section 24A(c)(6), Section 7527A(c)]
The inflation adjustment mechanism for the 'monthly specified child allowance' and 'initial threshold amount' relies on the CPI, which can be volatile and may lead to large discrepancies year-on-year, potentially impacting the financial planning of households reliant on these credits. [Section 24A(b)(3)]
The advance payments involve a complex bureaucratic process, implying higher administrative costs without measures specified to ensure efficiency or cost-effectiveness of the disbursement system, possibly escalating government spending. [Section 7527A]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states its short title, which is the “American Family Act.”
2. Establishment of refundable child tax credit with monthly advance payment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill introduces a refundable child tax credit with monthly payments, allowing families to get tax credits each month based on the number and age of their children. It sets income limits for the full credit, details eligibility requirements, and outlines how monthly payments will be made, including rules for coordination with territories like Puerto Rico and American Samoa.
Money References
- the sum of— “(A) $300, with respect to each specified child of such taxpayer who will (as of the close of such month) have attained age 6, plus “(B) 120 percent of the dollar amount in effect for such month under subparagraph (A), with respect to each specified child of such taxpayer who will not (as of the close of such month) have attained age 6.
- “(B) LIMITATION ON INITIAL REDUCTION.—The amount of the reduction under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the lesser of— “(i) the excess (if any) of— “(I) the monthly specified child allowance with respect to the taxpayer for such calendar month (determined without regard to this paragraph), over “(II) the amount which would be determined under subclause (I) if the dollar amounts in effect under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) were each equal to $166.67, or “(ii) 1⁄12 of 5 percent of the excess of the secondary threshold amount over the initial threshold amount.
- “(D) DEFINITIONS RELATED TO LIMITATIONS BASED ON MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—For purposes of this paragraph— “(i) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—The term ‘initial threshold amount’ means— “(I) $150,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), “(II) 1⁄2 the dollar amount in effect under subclause (I), in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and “(III) $112,500, in any other case.
- “(ii) SECONDARY THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—The term ‘secondary threshold amount’ means— “(I) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), “(II) $200,000, in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and “(III) $300,000, in any other case.
- CHILD ALLOWANCE.—In the case of any month beginning after December 31, 2025, the $300 amount in paragraph (1)(A) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by— “(ii) the percentage (if any) by which— “(I) the CPI (as defined in section 1(f)(4)) for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which such month begins, exceeds “(II) the CPI (as so defined) for calendar year 2024.
- “(B) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2024, the dollar amounts in subclauses (I) and (III) of paragraph (2)(D)(i) shall each be increased by an amount equal to— “(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(ii) the percentage (if any) which would be determined under subparagraph (A)(ii) if subclause (II) thereof were applied by substituting ‘2022’ for ‘2024’.
- — “(i) MONTHLY SPECIFIED CHILD ALLOWANCE.—Any increase under subparagraph (A) which is not a multiple of $10 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10.
- “(ii) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—Any increase under subparagraph (B) which is not a multiple of $5,000 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $5,000.
- “(a) In general.—There shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to $500 with respect to each specified dependent of such taxpayer for such taxable year.
- “(b) Limitation based on modified adjusted gross income.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the credit allowable under subsection (a) shall be reduced (but not below zero) by $50 for each $1,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income exceeds the threshold amount.
- “(2) THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘threshold amount’ means— “(A) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), “(B) $200,000, in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and “(C) $300,000, in any other case.
- “(d) Special rule for taxable year child attains age 18.—If any dependent of the taxpayer attains age 18 during the taxable year— “(1) whether such dependent is a specified dependent shall be determined without regard to paragraph (1) of subsection (c), and “(2) with respect to such dependent, subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting an amount for ‘$500’ that bears the same ratio to $500 as— “(A) the excess of— “(i) 12, over “(ii) the number of months during such taxable year with respect to which such dependent is a specified child of the taxpayer or any other taxpayer, bears to “(B) 12.
- “(C) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF ADVANCE PAYMENTS.— “(i) MIRROR CODE POSSESSIONS.—In the case of any possession described in subparagraph (B) which makes the election described in such subparagraph, the amount otherwise paid by the Secretary to such possession under section 24A(h)(1)(A) with respect to taxable years beginning in 2025, 2026, and 2027 shall each be increased by $300,000 if such possession has a plan, which has been approved by the Secretary, for making monthly advance child payments consistent with such election.
- “(ii) AMERICAN SAMOA.—The amount otherwise paid by the Secretary to American Samoa under subparagraph (A) of section 24A(h)(3) with respect to taxable years beginning in 2024, 2025, and 2026 shall each be increased by $300,000 if the plan described in subparagraph (B) of such section includes a program, which has been approved by the Secretary, for making monthly advance child payments under rules similar to the rules of this section.
24A. Monthly child tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes a Monthly Child Tax Credit that allows taxpayers to receive monthly allowances for each qualifying child under the age of 18. The allowance varies depending on the child’s age, income level of the taxpayer, and specific requirements, such as residency and citizenship criteria for the child, while also detailing limitations, eligibility, and potential reductions based on income.
Money References
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this section, the term “monthly specified child allowance” means, with respect to any taxpayer for any calendar month, the sum of— (A) $300, with respect to each specified child of such taxpayer who will (as of the close of such month) have attained age 6, plus (B) 120 percent of the dollar amount in effect for such month under subparagraph (A), with respect to each specified child of such taxpayer who will not (as of the close of such month) have attained age 6.
- (A) INITIAL REDUCTION.—The monthly specified child allowance otherwise determined under paragraph (1) with respect to any taxpayer for any calendar month shall be reduced (but not below zero) by 1⁄12 of 5 percent of the excess (if any) of the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the applicable taxable year over the initial threshold amount in effect for such applicable taxable year. (B) LIMITATION ON INITIAL REDUCTION.—The amount of the reduction under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the lesser of— (i) the excess (if any) of— (I) the monthly specified child allowance with respect to the taxpayer for such calendar month (determined without regard to this paragraph), over (II) the amount which would be determined under subclause (I) if the dollar amounts in effect under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) were each equal to $166.67, or (ii) 1⁄12 of 5 percent of the excess of the secondary threshold amount over the initial threshold amount.
- (D) DEFINITIONS RELATED TO LIMITATIONS BASED ON MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—For purposes of this paragraph— (i) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—The term “initial threshold amount” means— (I) $150,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), (II) 1⁄2 the dollar amount in effect under subclause (I), in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and (III) $112,500, in any other case.
- (ii) SECONDARY THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—The term “secondary threshold amount” means— (I) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), (II) $200,000, in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and (III) $300,000, in any other case.
- — (A) MONTHLY SPECIFIED CHILD ALLOWANCE.—In the case of any month beginning after December 31, 2025, the $300 amount in paragraph (1)(A) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (i) such dollar amount, multiplied by— (ii) the percentage (if any) by which— (I) the CPI (as defined in section 1(f)(4)) for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which such month begins, exceeds (II) the CPI (as so defined) for calendar year 2024.
- (B) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2024, the dollar amounts in subclauses (I) and (III) of paragraph (2)(D)(i) shall each be increased by an amount equal to— (i) such dollar amount, multiplied by (ii) the percentage (if any) which would be determined under subparagraph (A)(ii) if subclause (II) thereof were applied by substituting “2022” for “2024”.
- — (i) MONTHLY SPECIFIED CHILD ALLOWANCE.—Any increase under subparagraph (A) which is not a multiple of $10 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10. (ii) INITIAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—Any
- increase under subparagraph (B) which is not a multiple of $5,000 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $5,000. (c) Specified child.—For purposes of this section— (1) IN GENERAL.—The term “specified child” means, with respect to any taxpayer for any calendar month, an individual— (A) who has the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of such month, (B) who is younger than the taxpayer and will not, as of the close of such month, have attained age 18, (C) who receives care from the taxpayer during such month that is not compensated, (D) who is not the spouse of the taxpayer at any time during such month, and (E) who either— (i) is a citizen, national, or resident of the United States, or (ii) if the taxpayer is a citizen or national of the United States, such individual is a legally adopted individual of such taxpayer or is lawfully placed with such taxpayer for legal adoption by such taxpayer.
24B. Credit for certain other dependents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under Section 24B, taxpayers can claim a $500 tax credit for each specified dependent they have during the taxable year, as long as certain conditions are met. However, the credit is gradually reduced if their modified adjusted gross income exceeds specific thresholds, which vary based on filing status, and there are additional rules for dependents who turn 18 during the year.
Money References
- In general.—There shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to $500 with respect to each specified dependent of such taxpayer for such taxable year.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of the credit allowable under subsection (a) shall be reduced (but not below zero) by $50 for each $1,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income exceeds the threshold amount.
- (2) THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—For purposes of this subsection, the term “threshold amount” means— (A) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), (B) $200,000, in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and (C) $300,000, in any other case.
- (d) Special rule for taxable year child attains age 18.—If any dependent of the taxpayer attains age 18 during the taxable year— (1) whether such dependent is a specified dependent shall be determined without regard to paragraph (1) of subsection (c), and (2) with respect to such dependent, subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting an amount for “$500” that bears the same ratio to $500 as— (A) the excess of— (i) 12, over (ii) the number of months during such taxable year with respect to which such dependent is a specified child of the taxpayer or any other taxpayer, bears to (B) 12. (e) Identification requirements.—Rules similar to the rules of section 24A(e) shall apply for purposes of this section.
7527A. Monthly payments of child tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules for the monthly payment of child tax credits, where eligible taxpayers receive advance monthly payments based on their child's age and eligibility status. It includes provisions for how eligibility is determined, how payments are made and treated, and requirements for updating and notifying the taxpayers of changes or disputes in eligibility and payment amounts.
Money References
- (C) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF ADVANCE PAYMENTS.— (i) MIRROR CODE POSSESSIONS.—In the case of any possession described in subparagraph (B) which makes the election described in such subparagraph, the amount otherwise paid by the Secretary to such possession under section 24A(h)(1)(A) with respect to taxable years beginning in 2025, 2026, and 2027 shall each be increased by $300,000 if such possession has a plan, which has been approved by the Secretary, for making monthly advance child payments consistent with such election.
- SAMOA.—The amount otherwise paid by the Secretary to American Samoa under subparagraph (A) of section 24A(h)(3) with respect to taxable years beginning in 2024, 2025, and 2026 shall each be increased by $300,000 if the plan described in subparagraph (B) of such section includes a program, which has been approved by the Secretary, for making monthly advance child payments under rules similar to the rules of this section.