Overview
Title
To authorize the National Biotechnology Initiative, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 1387 is a plan to help America get better at using science to make new things called "biotechnology." It wants to make sure we do it safely and smartly by having a special team of experts and enough money to support everything planned.
Summary AI
S. 1387, introduced in the Senate, proposes the establishment of the National Biotechnology Initiative to boost national security, economic productivity, and competitiveness through biotechnology advancements. It involves various federal departments and agencies, coordinating activities to enhance research, streamline regulations, ensure national security, and foster workforce development in biotechnology. The bill also calls for the creation of the National Biotechnology Coordination Office within the Executive Office of the President, which will oversee the initiative and establish a comprehensive strategy for advancing biotechnology in the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the United States' competitiveness, security, and economic productivity through advancements in biotechnology. The bill establishes a framework for a coordinated national effort, led by the President, to advance biotechnology and align the efforts of various federal agencies. Key elements of the initiative include fostering research and development, improving regulatory processes, addressing national security concerns, and promoting workforce development.
The bill calls for the creation of a dedicated office within the Executive Office of the President, known as the National Biotechnology Coordination Office, which would oversee these efforts. Additionally, the legislation outlines the appointment and roles of the Director of this office, specifies agency responsibilities, and mandates reporting and strategic planning for biotechnology on a national scale.
Significant Issues
One of the major concerns with this bill is the lack of specificity regarding funding. The absence of detailed budget allocations or funding sources could lead to unchecked federal spending and financial mismanagement. The bill's language allows for broad interpretation, which, while aiming for flexibility, could result in ambiguous application and legal challenges.
Another issue stems from the ability to convene experts without adhering to the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This exemption raises concerns about transparency and accountability, as typical safeguards for ensuring impartial and public-advisory consultations are bypassed.
The bill authorizes significant appropriations escalating over the years, particularly in 2027, with no clear justification. This could lead to unnecessary spending, potentially duplicating existing efforts or resources, particularly regarding the construction of a new federal website for biotechnology-related activities.
Public Impact and Stakeholder Implications
For the public at large, the bill could have mixed implications. On the positive side, coordinated federal efforts in biotechnology could lead to advances in healthcare, environmental protection, and economic growth. Developing a skilled workforce could lead to new job opportunities and innovations that improve everyday life.
However, the broad definitions and general terms outlined in the bill might lead to inefficiencies or overlaps in federal activities. If the National Biotechnology Initiative expands beyond its necessary scope, it could result in wasted resources or focus, failing to deliver expected outcomes.
For specific stakeholders, such as biotech companies and research institutions, the initiative could offer significant opportunities for collaboration and funding. On the other hand, smaller entities might feel outpaced if larger, well-established companies or federal programs are preferred within the initiative's activities.
Regulatory streamlining might benefit the industry by hastening the process of bringing biotechnological products to market, but it also poses risks if safety or environmental standards are not properly enforced.
Overall, the bill balances prospective economic and scientific gains with potential risks of bloated bureaucracy and financial misallocation. Ensuring clear accountability and precise guidelines will be crucial to achieving its intended goals without unintended consequences.
Financial Assessment
The bill S. 1387 introduces several financial elements and considerations, which merit careful review in light of identified issues and potential impacts.
Financial Appropriations and Allocations
The bill proposes specific financial appropriations to support the establishment and activities of the National Biotechnology Coordination Office (NBCO). The appropriations for this office are delineated in Section 4, with a total allocation timeline starting from fiscal year 2026 through 2030. The amounts specified are:
- $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2026
- $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2027
- $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2028
- $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2029
- $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2030
This escalation in appropriations, especially the spike in fiscal year 2027, raises concerns regarding potential unchecked spending and the necessity of such an increase. Without clear benchmarks or a detailed reasoning for the increased allocation, it risks resulting in wasteful spending if the funds are not effectively managed or justified.
Relationship to Issues
One of the concerns related to these appropriations is the lack of specific metrics or goals for evaluating the success of the initiative, as noted in Section 3. The absence of detailed criteria leaves the financial health and effectiveness of the initiative vulnerable to subjective assessment, potentially leading to inefficiency.
Additionally, the authorization of appropriations as seen in Section 4 might lead to financial mismanagement due to insufficient oversight controls. The Director of the NBCO is granted authority to enter into contracts and cooperative agreements that could bypass typical financial oversight, making it a focal point for concerns around fiscal accountability.
Concerns About Potential Redundancy
The bill also includes a mandate for developing and maintaining a new federal website dedicated to biotechnology activities, as mentioned in Section 4. This creates a possibility of redundant spending, especially if similar platforms already exist within federal agencies. The necessity of this new platform should be critically assessed to avoid overlap and ensure efficient use of allocated funds.
Conclusion
Overall, the financial appropriations mentioned in S. 1387 reflect a significant investment in biotechnology initiatives. However, the outlined concerns emphasize the need for stringent oversight, clear justification for spending increases, and robust mechanisms to evaluate the success and efficiency of these allocations. Addressing these concerns is crucial to ensure that public funds are managed responsibly and effectively contribute to the bill's objectives.
Issues
The broad definitions provided in Section 2, such as 'biotechnology' and 'bioliteracy', could lead to ambiguity in the application of the Act, making it difficult to determine the precise scope and limits of what is covered. This could result in inefficiencies and legal challenges regarding interpretation.
In Section 3, there is a lack of specificity regarding budget or funding sources for the National Biotechnology Initiative, raising concerns about potential for unchecked federal spending.
The exemption of the convening of experts from the Federal Advisory Committee Act in Section 5 could lead to concerns about a lack of transparency and accountability, as it bypasses typical standards required for federal advisory committees.
Section 4's provision allowing the Director of the National Biotechnology Coordination Office to enter into and perform contracts, leases, and cooperative agreements might lead to inadequate oversight on spending activities, potentially resulting in financial mismanagement.
The authorization of escalating appropriations in Section 4 without clear justification could lead to unnecessary and wasteful spending, with a significant increase in fiscal year 2027.
The language in Section 4 regarding the establishment of a new website and its maintenance could lead to redundant spending if it duplicates existing resources, questioning the necessity of such a platform.
The broad language allowing for any other federal department or agency to participate in the Initiative as deemed appropriate by the Director, found in Section 3, may lead to an expanded scope without clear limits or accountability, raising concerns over potential jurisdictional issues and scope creep.
Section 3's lack of specific metrics or goals for evaluating the success of the initiative leaves it open to subjective assessment and potential inefficiency, as there are no clear benchmarks for success.
The exemption from the Federal Advisory Committee Act in Section 5 and the potential favoritism in the selection process of experts convened under this section could raise ethical concerns regarding the impartiality of expert consultations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that the official name for the legislation is the “National Biotechnology Initiative Act of 2025”.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides definitions for key terms used in the Act, such as bioliteracy (understanding and engaging with biology), biomanufacturing (using biotechnology in manufacturing), and biotechnology (applying science to use living organisms). It also clarifies roles like the Director of the National Biotechnology Coordination Office and concepts like the National Biotechnology Initiative.
3. Authorization of the National Biotechnology Initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Biotechnology Initiative is a plan that the President will oversee to boost national security, economic growth, and competitiveness through biotechnology research and coordination. Various government agencies will collaborate on this initiative to address issues like biotechnology advancements, national security, regulatory simplification, and developing a skilled workforce in biotechnology.
4. Initiative coordination Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a plan to create a National Biotechnology Coordination Office within 180 days of the act's enactment, which will support a federal initiative to coordinate biotechnology efforts. The office, led by an appointed director, is responsible for planning, managing, and coordinating various biotech activities, including national security, research, data management, commercialization, regulatory streamlining, workforce development, and international partnerships. Additionally, it outlines the formation of an interagency committee and the development of coordinated strategies, reports, and a public website to streamline federal biotechnology initiatives.
Money References
- (B) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director of the National Science Foundation to carry out subparagraph (A)— (i) $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; (ii) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2027; (iii) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2028; (iv) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2029; and (v) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2030.
5. Convening of experts on biotechnology research and development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the National Biotechnology Coordination Office is allowed to gather experts to provide advice on biotechnology research and development efforts, and this process is exempt from the usual rules that apply to federal advisory committees.
6. Agency activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines various activities that each agency head must support to advance biotechnology in multiple sectors like defense, health, and agriculture. These activities include planning, national security analysis, research and development, data management, product commercialization, regulating biotech products, ensuring safety, training the workforce, promoting public understanding, fostering international partnerships, and addressing other needs related to biotechnology.