Overview
Title
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Benton MacKaye Trail as a national scenic trail.
ELI5 AI
The bill asks a special person in charge of taking care of national trails to look into whether a long path through the woods in Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina named the Benton MacKaye Trail should be marked as a special, beautiful path for people to walk on. They need to see if it's possible and if it would help nearby towns, and they have one year to figure it out.
Summary AI
S. 1376 is a bill that proposes changes to the National Trails System Act, asking the Secretary of Agriculture to study the possibility of making the Benton MacKaye Trail a national scenic trail. This trail winds through Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina, offering around 287 miles of picturesque, nonmotorized paths including forests, mountains, and waterfalls. The study should be completed within one year and assess how feasible it is to officially recognize the trail, with a focus on its existing maintenance and economic impact on rural communities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, "Benton MacKaye National Scenic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025," seeks to explore the possibility of designating the Benton MacKaye Trail as a national scenic trail. Introduced by Senators Tillis, Warnock, and Budd, the bill aims to amend the National Trails System Act to commission a feasibility study conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture. The study will determine whether the 287-mile trail, which traverses through Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina, is suitable for designation as a national scenic trail.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill outlines a congressional desire to assess the potential designation of the Benton MacKaye Trail as a national scenic trail. It highlights the trail's scenic beauty, its role in promoting economic opportunities for rural communities, its accessibility, and the history of successful maintenance by the Benton MacKaye Trail Association. If enacted, the legislation requires the Secretary of Agriculture to consult with interested organizations and submit a feasibility study to Congress within one year.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue with the bill is the lack of a specified budget for conducting the feasibility study. Without a clear understanding of potential costs, there is a risk of misuse of federal resources. Additionally, the bill explicitly mentions consultation with the Benton MacKaye Trail Association, potentially implying favoritism towards this organization and risking the objectivity of the study. The deadline set for completing the feasibility study—one year post-enactment—might be challenging to meet due to the complexity of such a project. Another issue is the vagueness around the "interested organizations" to be consulted, raising concerns about stakeholder inclusion. Lastly, the trail is described as a "scenic, nonmotorized trail," which may not encompass all relevant considerations for its suitability as a national scenic trail.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, if the trail is designated as a national scenic trail, it could increase public access to one of the nation's picturesque natural areas and boost tourism. This designation could also further protect the trail's natural resources and ensure its sustained maintenance. However, there may be concerns about federal spending on a feasibility study without explicit budget details, especially during times of economic uncertainty.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the Benton MacKaye Trail Association and local communities, the potential designation could provide economic benefits through increased tourism and associated commerce, enhancing livelihoods in rural areas. Outdoor enthusiasts might also benefit from improved accessibility and infrastructure. Conversely, there is a risk that increased visitation could strain local resources and require more comprehensive management strategies. Furthermore, there might be tension if certain stakeholders feel excluded from the consultation process or believe the study is biased towards certain interests.
In conclusion, while the bill presents opportunities for economic and recreational benefits, its execution must be carefully managed to address the financial, temporal, and inclusivity concerns, ensuring that a fair and thorough feasibility study is conducted.
Issues
The text of Section 3 does not specify the estimated cost of conducting the feasibility study, which could lead to concerns about potential wasteful spending without a clear budget, particularly given the financial constraints on federal resources.
Section 3 raises a potential bias concern as the text specifically mentions consultation with the Benton MacKaye Trail Association, which might suggest favoritism or an unfair advantage to this organization in influencing the outcome of the study, potentially undermining the objectivity of the study.
The timeline set in Section 3 for completing the feasibility study is restricted to 1 year after the enactment of the paragraph, which might be a tight or unrealistic deadline given the scope and complexity of the study, potentially compromising the thoroughness and quality of the study.
The language in Section 3, 'in consultation with interested organizations,' is ambiguous, as it does not define which organizations, besides the Benton MacKaye Trail Association, might be included, leading to potential exclusion or oversight of relevant stakeholders in the study process.
The description of the Benton MacKaye Trail in Section 2 as a 'scenic, nonmotorized trail' does not provide enough detail about the nature, condition, or current usage of the trail, which could impact the assessment for national scenic trail designation, possibly leading to misinformed conclusions about its suitability for scenic status.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act designates it as the “Benton MacKaye National Scenic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes the Benton MacKaye Trail as a nonmotorized, scenic path stretching 287 miles through Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina, offering diverse landscapes, economic benefits to rural communities, and low maintenance costs due to its location on mostly federal land and ongoing care by the Benton MacKaye Trail Association.
3. Benton mackaye national scenic trail feasibility study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes an amendment to the National Trails System Act to add the Benton MacKaye Trail, a 287-mile scenic, nonmotorized trail through Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina. It requires the Secretary of Agriculture, in collaboration with relevant organizations, to conduct and submit a feasibility study within one year to evaluate the trail's designation as a national scenic trail.