Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand, and make permanent certain modifications of, the earned income credit.

ELI5 AI

The Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025 is a plan to help workers by giving more people extra money back on their taxes, especially if they don't earn a lot of money, by changing some rules to include younger and older workers and allowing people in U.S. territories to get the same benefits.

Summary AI

The bill S. 1372, titled the “Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025,” aims to make certain changes to the federal earned income credit permanent and expand its benefits. It lowers the minimum age requirement to qualify for the credit, removes the maximum age limit, and increases both the credit and phaseout percentages. Additionally, it raises the earned income limits to allow more people to access the credit. The bill also provides rules for applying the earned income credit to U.S. territories and allows taxpayers to elect to use their prior year's earned income to calculate their credit if it was higher than the current year's income. These changes would take effect for taxable years starting after December 31, 2025.

Published

2025-04-09
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-04-09
Package ID: BILLS-119s1372is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,751
Pages:
9
Sentences:
27

Language

Nouns: 520
Verbs: 111
Adjectives: 83
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 75
Entities: 146

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.71
Average Sentence Length:
64.85
Token Entropy:
4.91
Readability (ARI):
31.64

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025" introduces significant changes to the U.S. tax system, specifically focusing on amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary goal is to expand and make permanent modifications to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The legislation aims to support workers by lowering the eligibility age for individuals without qualifying children, eliminating the upper age limit, and increasing the credit amounts while also applying these credits to U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and American Samoa.

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill seeks to revise several critical aspects of the EITC. It lowers the minimum age eligibility for individuals without qualifying children from 25 to 19, with exceptions for certain youth categories who can qualify at age 18. Additionally, the maximum age limit is removed, allowing older taxpayers to benefit from the credit. The credit and phase-out percentages are increased, and higher earned income limits are set, all adjusted for inflation. The bill also allows taxpayers to utilize the previous year's income for credit calculations if it was higher than the current year, a move beneficial for those with fluctuating earnings. Finally, the applicability of the EITC is expanded to include certain U.S. territories indefinitely, removing prior calendar year limitations.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several concerns accompany this legislative proposal:

  1. Increased Government Spending: Expanding the age range and increasing credit percentages without clear fiscal projections could strain government resources, impacting long-term budget planning.

  2. Need for Clarification and Guidance: Terms like "qualified homeless youth" and "qualified former foster youth" require detailed guidelines from the Secretary, which, if delayed or unclear, could lead to inconsistent application.

  3. Potential for Tax Revenue Loss: The bill's changes might result in reduced tax revenues. Without a detailed economic impact assessment, the extent of this impact remains uncertain.

  4. Privacy and Consent Concerns: The mechanisms for obtaining consent from required stakeholders for information sharing are not clearly defined, raising potential privacy issues.

  5. Risk of Manipulation: The option to elect prior year income poses risks of misuse. Although it supports taxpayers with erratic income, robust monitoring systems are essential to safeguard against exploitation.

Potential Public Impact

Broad Implications

This bill could provide substantial financial relief to younger workers and older individuals who were previously ineligible for the EITC, consequently increasing their disposable income. This increase in household income could stimulate economic activity as more people have money to spend. However, the bill could also result in higher public spending, necessitating careful fiscal management to ensure economic sustainability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Low-Income Individuals: These changes may provide vital financial assistance to low-income workers, especially young adults and older individuals re-entering the workforce, who can now access benefits previously out of reach.

  • U.S. Territories: By including U.S. territories under the EITC provisions, regions such as Puerto Rico and American Samoa may see increased economic support, boosting local economies and aiding in poverty reduction.

  • Tax Administrators: The ambiguities and potential for increased complexity might pose challenges for those administering these tax credits, requiring additional resources and training to handle new provisions effectively.

In summary, while the "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025" proposes impactful changes that could benefit many, it also presents challenges that need addressing to ensure both effectiveness and fiscal prudence. Future success will heavily depend on transparent implementation and robust oversight to balance the proposed benefits against potential economic and administrative downsides.

Financial Assessment

The "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025," as outlined in bill S. 1372, introduces various financial changes aimed at altering the dynamics of the federal earned income credit system. Key financial elements of the bill are designed to broaden the reach of the earned income credit while potentially influencing government spending.

Expansion of Earned Income Credit

A significant portion of the bill focuses on increasing the amounts related to the earned income credit. Specifically, Section 2 stipulates increases in the credit by amending the current income thresholds and phaseout percentages:

  • The earned income threshold is increased from $4,220 to $9,820.
  • The phaseout threshold rises from $5,280 to $11,610.

This increase allows more people to qualify for the earned income credit by expanding eligibility through higher income ceilings. By doubling these thresholds, the bill proposes a substantial government payout to eligible lower-income workers, which could result in an increase in public spending.

Inflation Adjustments

The bill also introduces provisions to account for inflation, ensuring that these financial figures remain relevant over time. The structure allows for the adjustment of dollar amounts based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), starting in specific years, like 2021, 2025, and other past dates depending on the section. This automatic inflation adjustment mechanism seeks to maintain the real value of the credit over time.

Financial Impacts and Concerns

These financial modifications inherently mean a potentially larger expenditure from federal revenues to support increased eligibility and higher credits for recipients. Issues identified, such as the potential for increased government spending without clear budgetary impacts or economic assessments, underscore the need for careful evaluation. The amendments could lead to loss of tax revenue due to the broadened eligibility and increased payouts.

Furthermore, by allowing taxpayers to elect to use their prior year's earned income (if higher) for calculating their credit, the bill provides flexibility to those with fluctuating incomes. However, this flexibility must be monitored to prevent any potential misuse, as misreporting could be treated merely as a mathematical error.

Territorial Implications

Extending the credit to include U.S. possessions like Puerto Rico and American Samoa without calendar year limitations introduces potential ambiguities about the fiscal impacts on these regions. The changes aim to integrate these territories more fully into the earned income credit system but lack a detailed financial impact study specific to these areas.

Privacy and Clarifications

Lastly, the bill lacks clear instructions on how individuals can consent to disclose their information for eligibility verification, raising ethical concerns about privacy. It is necessary for the Secretary to clarify definitions and procedures to avoid inconsistencies or misuse.

In conclusion, while the proposed expansions in bill S. 1372 intend to aid workers, particularly those with lower incomes, the financial adjustments carry implications for government fiscal policy and require careful implementation to mitigate risks identified in the issues section.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 to decrease the minimum age and eliminate the maximum age for the earned income credit could lead to increased government spending without clear projections on its budgetary impact, which is critical for fiscal planning and sustainability.

  • Provisions in Section 2 require clarifications from the Secretary regarding terms like 'qualified homeless youth' and 'qualified former foster youth', which may lead to inconsistencies in interpretation and implementation until formal guidance is issued.

  • Section 2 introduces significant increases in credit and phaseout percentages, which can greatly impact government budgets and potentially result in loss of tax revenue without a clear assessment of the economic impact.

  • The amendments in Section 3 about the removal of calendar year limitations for U.S. possessions lack a clear rationale and impact assessment, which may cause ambiguity about fiscal impacts on regions like Puerto Rico and American Samoa.

  • The lack of clarity in Section 2 regarding the mechanisms for individuals to provide consent for sharing their personal information with the Secretary raises ethical concerns about privacy and data protection.

  • The election to use prior year earned income in Section 4 could invite manipulation if not properly monitored, posing financial risks to the integrity of the system, although it aims to aid individuals with fluctuating incomes.

  • Section 4 mentions that incorrect use of prior year income will be treated as a mathematical error, which may confuse taxpayers and complicate the process of addressing genuine errors in tax filings.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the act is the “Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025.”

2. Permanent extension of earned income credit rules for individuals without qualifying children Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes several changes to the earned income tax credit (EITC) rules for people without qualifying children by lowering the minimum age to 19 (or 18 for certain foster or homeless youth), removing the maximum age limit, increasing credit and phaseout percentages, raising earned income limits, and applying inflation adjustments to these amounts. These changes will take effect for tax years starting after December 31, 2025.

Money References

  • (d) Increase in earned income and phaseout amounts.—The table contained in subparagraph (A) of section 32(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “$4,220” and inserting “$9,820”, and (2) by striking “$5,280” and inserting “$11,610”.
  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 32(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: “(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after— “(A) 2021, in the case of the dollar amount in subsection (i)(1), “(B) 2026, in the case of the dollar amounts in the third row of the table in subsection (b)(2)(A), and “(C) 2015, in any other case, each of the dollar amounts in subsections (b)(2) and (i)(1) shall be increased by an amount equal to the inflation amount.”. (2) INFLATION AMOUNT.—Subsection (j) of section 32 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(3) INFLATION AMOUNT.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the inflation amount with respect to any dollar amount for any taxable year is the amount equal to— “(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(B) the percentage (if any) by which— “(i) the CPI (as defined in section 1(f)(4)) for the calendar year preceding the year in which the taxable year begins, exceeds “(ii) the CPI (as so defined) for— “(I) in the case of amounts in the third row of the table in subsection (b)(2)(A), 2025, “(II) in the case of any other amount in subsection (b)(2)(A), 1995, “(III) in the case of the $5,000 amount in subsection (b)(2)(B), 2008, and “(IV) in the case of the $10,000 amount in subsection (i)(1), 2020.”.

3. Application of earned income credit to possessions of the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by removing specific references to the years 2021 through 2025 in connection with applying the earned income tax credit to Puerto Rico, other U.S. territories with a mirror code tax system, and American Samoa.

4. Election to use prior year earned income Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to the Internal Revenue Code allows taxpayers, starting from the 2026 tax year, to use their earned income from the previous year to calculate their tax credit if it was higher than their current year's earned income. This option is available to joint filers, and any errors made in this election will be treated as simple mathematical mistakes.