Overview
Title
To support the execution of bilateral agreements concerning illicit transnational maritime activity and to authorize the President to impose sanctions with respect to illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing and the sale, supply, purchase, or transfer of endangered species, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025 lets the President stop people or ships from doing illegal fishing or trading rare animals by using tough rules or punishments, and it works with other countries to make sure everybody follows the rules.
Summary AI
S. 1369, also known as the “Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025,” is proposed to support bilateral agreements aimed at stopping illegal activities related to fishing and endangered species. It permits the President to impose sanctions on any foreign person or vessel involved in illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing and trade in endangered species. The bill focuses on international cooperation, especially against activities by the People’s Republic of China, and seeks to influence related decisions in global forums like the United Nations. It also requires reports on the effectiveness of these measures and introduces penalties for those who violate them.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025," aims to address issues surrounding illicit transnational maritime activities, specifically targeting illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing and the trade of endangered species. The bill provides a framework for the United States to engage in international collaboration, authorize the President to impose sanctions on foreign entities involved in such activities, and enhance transparency and reporting requirements with respect to global and regional fishing practices.
Significant Issues
A key issue within the bill lies in the framework for imposing sanctions. Section 4 establishes the President's authority to sanction entities involved in IUU fishing and trading endangered species. However, it lacks specific guidelines on the criteria for imposing these sanctions, potentially leading to inconsistent application. Furthermore, the waiver provision, which allows for bypassing sanctions in the "national interests of the United States," is broad and lacks clear constraints, posing a risk of misuse.
Another notable aspect is the emphasis on actions by the People's Republic of China. While acknowledging China's significant global fishing influence, this focus could be seen as politically charged, potentially affecting diplomatic relations.
The bill also relies on existing definitions from other Acts, such as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which could create legal complications if revisions to these definitions occur without corresponding updates to this bill.
Broad Public Impact
If effectively implemented, the bill could have several positive impacts on the public. By aiming to curb illegal fishing activities and protect endangered species, the legislation supports sustainable marine practices and conservation efforts, which benefit ecological balance and biodiversity. This can have extended positive effects on global food security, especially for communities reliant on marine resources.
Furthermore, increased transparency and cooperation with international partners might enhance global governance and adherence to maritime laws, potentially resulting in improved economic conditions for nations involved in legal maritime trade.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Environmental Groups and Conservationists: Environmental advocates and conservationists are likely to view the bill favorably, as it aligns with their goals of protecting marine ecosystems and endangered species. The focus on international collaboration and sanctions may help deter illicit activities that harm the environment.
Fishing Industry and Coastal Economies: Legitimate stakeholders in the fishing industry could benefit from the bill as it seeks to level the playing field by penalizing illegal operators who unfairly compete and deplete marine resources. Conversely, industries and economies reliant on practices deemed illegal under the bill could face negative impacts, particularly if they are targeted by sanctions without clear due process or recourse.
Foreign Relations and Diplomacy: The specific mention of actions by Chinese entities might exacerbate geopolitical tensions, potentially affecting trade and diplomatic relationships, not only with China but with other nations observing the U.S. approach to international sanctions.
Legal and Regulatory Bodies: Agencies tasked with implementing the sanctions and reporting may experience increased administrative responsibilities. Without defined budgets or resources specified, as highlighted in Section 5, there could be logistical challenges in effectively executing the intended measures of the bill.
In conclusion, the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025" seeks to address significant environmental and regulatory challenges in global fisheries, offering potential benefits in ecological protection and fair trade practices. However, its provisions pose challenges related to implementation clarity, focus on specific international actors, and administrative execution, all of which would need careful consideration to achieve its intended outcomes.
Issues
The lack of clarity and specificity on the processes and criteria for imposing sanctions in Section 4 could lead to inconsistent application and potential misuse, raising legal and ethical concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of the sanctions.
The waiver provision in Section 4(d) is based on 'national interests of the United States' but is broad and lacks clear guidelines or constraints, which could result in the provision being subject to misuse, thereby undermining the intended impact of the sanctions.
The emphasis on the People's Republic of China in Section 3 could be viewed as politically controversial, as it may be perceived as targeting a specific nation rather than maintaining a neutral stance on illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing activities worldwide.
The potential for ambiguity in the definition and application of the term 'materially assisted' in Section 4(a)(4) could lead to enforcement challenges and raises concerns about legal interpretation and fairness in implementation.
Section 2's reliance on definitions from other Acts for key terms like 'admission' and 'alien' could cause legal complications if those definitions are revised without parallel updates to this bill, creating potential for misinterpretation.
The humanitarian exception in Section 4(e)(4) may be overly broad and potentially exploitable, allowing entities to conduct activities under the guise of humanitarian aid, thus diluting the effectiveness of the sanctions aimed at preventing illegal activities.
The lack of specified budgets or resource allocations in Section 5 for the activities described raises concerns about the financial feasibility and sustainability of the initiatives to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing.
The requirement for a 'classified annex' within otherwise unclassified reports in Section 5 could limit transparency and accessibility of important information to Congress and the public, potentially undermining trust and accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025".
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including what is meant by "admission", "alien", and "lawfully admitted for permanent residence" as per the Immigration and Nationality Act, as well as the congressional committees involved in Armed Services and Foreign Affairs. It also defines a "foreign person" as someone or an entity that isn't a U.S. person, "illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing" based on regulations under fishing laws, and explains that a "United States person" includes U.S. citizens, certain legal entities, and anyone located in the U.S.
3. International collaboration related to countering illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the United States' policy to work with other countries and international organizations to combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing. It mandates the Secretary of State to utilize the country's influence in international settings to promote technology use for maritime law enforcement and to hold those responsible for such harmful fishing practices accountable, with an emphasis on addressing the actions of the People's Republic of China. Additionally, the President can direct the UN representative to encourage the UN to take more significant steps in supporting global efforts against these fishing activities.
4. Authorization of imposition of sanctions with respect to illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing and trade in endangered species Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The President has the power to impose sanctions on foreign individuals or vessels involved in illegal fishing or trading endangered species. These sanctions can include freezing assets, denying visas, access, and loans, with some exceptions for national security, humanitarian efforts, and international agreements.
5. Briefing and report on global illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Secretary of State, along with the Secretary of Defense, to brief Congress within 90 days about efforts to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and to provide annual reports for four years on related international cooperation and enforcement efforts. It also focuses on working with allies, assessing fishing patterns of China, and participating in global forums to address these fishing issues.