Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to give priority in the consideration of suicide prevention grants to entities located in States that have not received such a grant, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill S. 1361 wants to make sure places where veterans live and haven't gotten help before get a chance to try programs that stop them from being very sad, by giving these places first pick when giving out help.
Summary AI
S. 1361 aims to give priority to suicide prevention grants for veterans in states that have not yet received such grants. The bill amends the existing law to mandate that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs gives preference to entities in these states when awarding grants. This preference will continue until at least one grant is granted to an eligible entity in those states.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Every State Counts for Veterans Mental Health Act," aims to amend existing laws related to the distribution of suicide prevention grants by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Specifically, it seeks to prioritize states that have not yet received these grants, enhancing their ability to combat veteran suicide. The bill mandates scoring preference for grant applications from such states to ensure that every state can access necessary resources to address the mental health needs of veterans.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several significant issues within the bill that could affect its implementation and impact:
Definition of 'Eligible Entity': The bill does not provide a clear definition of what constitutes an "eligible entity" for the purposes of awarding grants. This ambiguity could lead to confusion among applicants and evaluators and may result in inconsistent application of the law.
Impact on States with Existing Programs: By prioritizing states that haven't received grants, the bill may inadvertently disadvantage states with already successful programs. Such states could face reduced support, potentially undermining ongoing efforts in areas where veterans are benefiting from established resources.
Clarity of 'Scoring Preference': The term "scoring preference" lacks a precise definition in the bill, which could lead to varying interpretations. This could affect the fairness and transparency of the grant evaluation and awarding process.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill has the potential to significantly impact veterans across the United States, especially those in states that have not yet received suicide prevention grants. By broadening the distribution of resources, the bill aims to ensure a more equitable approach to tackling veterans' mental health issues on a national scale. If implemented effectively, it could improve support structures in underserved regions, potentially reducing veteran suicide rates in those areas.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Veterans in Underserved States: - This group stands to benefit significantly from the bill as it seeks to provide them with access to resources that were previously unavailable. These resources could play a crucial role in improving mental health support and outcomes for veterans in these regions.
States with Established Programs: - Conversely, states with existing, successful programs might face challenges. The redirection of emphasis to states that have not previously received grants could lead to reduced funding or support for their ongoing programs. This could be detrimental to veterans who currently rely on consistent support services.
Entities Applying for Grants: - The lack of clarity regarding "eligible entities" and "scoring preference" could lead to complications and inconsistencies in the grant application process. Organizations that previously received grants might need to reassess their strategies to remain competitive, while new applicants in prioritized states may have an easier path forward.
Overall, while the bill proposes a strategy to distribute resources more evenly across states, ensuring that its execution is clear and equitable will be essential to mitigating unintended negative consequences. Addressing the issues of clarity and balance will be key to maximizing the positive impacts envisioned by the legislation.
Issues
The provision in Section 2 to prioritize entities in states that have not received a grant might unintentionally disadvantage states with ongoing successful programs. This could create an inequity in resource distribution, potentially depriving veterans in certain areas of consistent support.
The text in Section 2 does not clearly define what constitutes an 'eligible entity'. This lack of clarity could lead to ambiguity in the application and awarding process, possibly causing confusion and inconsistency among applicants and evaluators.
The term 'scoring preference' in Section 2 is not clearly defined. This could lead to inconsistent interpretation and application during the grant evaluation process, potentially affecting the fairness and transparency of the grant awards.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section indicates the official name of the Act, which is the “Every State Counts for Veterans Mental Health Act.”
2. Priority for Department of Veterans Affairs suicide prevention grant recipients in States in which a grant has not been awarded Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to ensure that when the Department of Veterans Affairs awards suicide prevention grants, they prioritize applications from states that have not yet received any such grants. Additionally, it gives scoring preference to applicants from those states until at least one grant is awarded there.