Overview
Title
To improve availability of information relating to cybersecurity threats.
ELI5 AI
S. 1337 wants to keep sharing information about internet safety problems for 10 more years, so people can better protect themselves from those problems.
Summary AI
S. 1337 aims to improve the availability of information about cybersecurity threats. The bill, introduced by Mr. Peters and Mr. Rounds, proposes to extend the effective period of a section of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 from the year 2025 to 2035. This extension is intended to facilitate continued information sharing on cybersecurity threats.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Cybersecurity Information Sharing Extension Act" aims to extend the period of effectiveness for a specific section of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. Originally set to expire in 2025, the new proposed expiration date is 2035. This legislative action proposes to extend the duration of specific cybersecurity measures by ten years. Senators Peters and Rounds introduced the bill on April 8, 2025, and it was then referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs for further consideration.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues identified in the bill is the lack of justification or context for extending the effective period of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 by ten years. Without a clear rationale or accompanying data, it is difficult to determine whether this extension is necessary or advantageous in addressing cybersecurity threats. Additionally, the bill does not clarify how this extended period might affect existing policies, budgets, or oversight mechanisms, which could result in ambiguity regarding long-term implications and government accountability. Finally, the bill does not specify how this extension aligns with current cybersecurity threat assessments or national strategies, leaving its appropriateness open to question.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, extending the effective period of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 might maintain certain cybersecurity measures longer than originally planned. This could mean prolonged access to information sharing initiatives designed to enhance the country's cyber defenses. However, without clear justification or evidence of effectiveness, public confidence might be affected, as citizens may question whether these measures adequately protect against new or evolving cybersecurity threats.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The extension could impact various stakeholders differently:
Government Agencies: Federal agencies responsible for implementing and enforcing the cybersecurity measures in question might face challenges if there's a lack of clarity on policy adjustments or financial allocations related to the extension.
Private Sector and Businesses: Companies that partner with the government in sharing cybersecurity information might find that their participation continues for another decade. This could be beneficial if aligned with their strategic goals but potentially burdensome if obligations are not clearly defined.
Cybersecurity Experts and Analysts: Professionals in cybersecurity might view this extension with skepticism if it lacks accompanying documentation that demonstrates its continued relevance or effectiveness. They may advocate for further studies to ensure that the legislative changes keep pace with evolving threats.
Overall, while the bill proposes an extension to existing cybersecurity measures, its lack of detailed explanation and foresight might complicate its perceived effectiveness and relevance amidst the ever-changing landscape of cybersecurity challenges.
Issues
The amendment to Section 111(a) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 extends its effective period by ten years, from 2025 to 2035, without providing a justification for this significant change. The lack of context or explanation poses challenges in assessing the necessity or benefits of the extension, especially considering potential impacts on cybersecurity policy and strategy. (Section 2)
The text of the bill does not address how the extended effective period will impact existing policies, budgets, or oversight mechanisms related to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. This absence of detail could lead to ambiguity regarding the long-term implications, potentially affecting government accountability and the allocation of resources. (Section 2)
The lack of information on how the date extension aligns with current cybersecurity threat assessments or national strategies creates uncertainty about whether the new timeline is appropriate. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the strategic fit of the legislative change in the context of evolving cybersecurity challenges. (Section 2)
The section titled 'Short title' (Section 1) is standard and does not provide substantive content, limiting the ability to identify potential issues in spending or language clarity. While typical for such sections, it does not address any specific concerns relevant to clarity or legislative impact.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies the short title of the law, stating that it may be referred to as the “Cybersecurity Information Sharing Extension Act”.
2. Effective period Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 111(a) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 is changed to extend the end date from 2025 to 2035.