Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable credit for certain home accessibility improvements.
ELI5 AI
Bill S. 1315 is like giving families some money back from their taxes when they make changes to their home to help people with disabilities or older folks get around better, but they have to follow certain rules about how much they can spend and who can get it.
Summary AI
The bill S. 1315 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable tax credit for home accessibility improvements. This credit covers 35% of expenses, up to $10,000 a year and $30,000 total, for improvements that make homes more accessible to people with disabilities or seniors. Eligible modifications include things like installing ramps, handrails, and widened doorways. The bill also outlines income limits for claiming the credit, establishes a list of qualifying modifications, and mandates a study to assess the credit's effectiveness.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This bill, numbered S. 1315, was introduced in the 119th Congress to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It proposes providing a refundable tax credit to individuals for certain home accessibility improvements. This initiative aims to enhance the living conditions for those who are elderly (aged 60 and above) or living with disabilities by allowing a 35% credit of the qualifying expenditures. The improvements covered might include installations like ramps, grab bars, widened doorways, and other home modifications that help ensure safe and accessible living spaces.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several notable issues:
Complexity in Calculation: The bill includes intricate calculation methods for determining the credit, particularly the income limitations and phaseout process. This could confuse taxpayers when trying to ascertain their eligibility.
Updating and Maintaining Qualified Improvements: There's a reliance on the government to maintain a list of qualified improvements, which could result in inconsistencies if not properly managed and communicated.
Exclusion of Certain Filers: Individuals who are married but file separately are excluded from benefiting from the credit, which might be perceived as unfair.
Language and Accessibility: The legal language used throughout the bill may not be easily understood by the general public, potentially limiting access to these benefits.
Documentation Requirements: Obtaining necessary documentation for a "disability certification" could be a hurdle for some individuals, posing another barrier to accessing the credit.
Impact on the Public
The introduction of a tax credit for home accessibility improvements holds the potential for a broad positive impact by supporting individuals with disabilities and the elderly, allowing them to live more safely and independently. The financial relief could encourage individuals and families to make necessary modifications to their homes, which might improve their quality of life and reduce injury risks.
However, the complexity involved in understanding and accessing the tax credit might limit its effectiveness. If potential beneficiaries find the process challenging to navigate, the goal of facilitating home improvements might not be fully achieved.
Stakeholder Impact
Several groups might be particularly affected by this bill:
Elderly Individuals and Those with Disabilities: These primary beneficiaries stand to gain significantly in terms of improved living environments and a potential reduction in living-assisted care requirements.
Families and Caregivers: Relatives or caregivers of elderly or disabled individuals could find some financial relief through these credits as they support their loved ones in making necessary home modifications.
Taxpayers Filing Separately: The exclusion of married taxpayers who file separately might place undue financial strain on those individuals who cannot benefit from this relief.
Healthcare Providers: They might play an extended role in certifying disabilities, which could add to their existing responsibilities but also include a valuable service in helping patients improve their living conditions.
The bill's effectiveness will hinge on the clarity of its implementation and the extent of public awareness efforts. Without adequate outreach and clear documentation processes, the risk of underutilization remains high despite the potential benefits.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, S. 1315, seeks to introduce a refundable tax credit within the Internal Revenue Code that is specifically aimed at making homes more accessible for individuals with disabilities or seniors. This legislative initiative provides a35% credit on qualified expenses associated with such home improvements. However, it imposes certain caps on this financial assistance, allowing up to $10,000 to be claimed annually by a taxpayer, with an accumulative cap of $30,000 across all taxable years.
Financial Implications
Annual and Lifetime Caps
The bill's provision that caps claims at $10,000 annually and $30,000 lifetime addresses concerns of disproportionate claims which may skew benefits towards those with the financial means to spend significantly on improvements. This restriction ensures a broader distribution of aid across eligible taxpayers. However, it may also limit the capacity of individuals needing more extensive home modifications from fully utilizing the benefits if their cost exceeds these caps.
Income Limitations
The introduction of income-based thresholds could limit accessibility to the tax credits. The credit starts phasing out when a taxpayer's income exceeds certain thresholds: $400,000 for joint filings, and $200,000 for heads of households and other filers. The phase-out further applies depending on income levels surpassing these thresholds by $100,000 for joint filings, $75,000 for heads of households, and $50,000 for others. The complexity in calculating these phaseouts involves multi-step assessments with ratios, which might confuse taxpayers, leading to potential miscalculations and impacting their eligibility, as noted in the issue list.
Complexity and Implementation Issues
One incontrovertible challenge outlined is the potential complexity perceived by taxpayers regarding the calculation of the income limitations, which requires careful navigation through different thresholds and ratios. This complexity can serve as a deterrent for taxpayers who might otherwise benefit from these provisions. The bill thus imposes a need for strategic communication and possibly aid services to ensure taxpayers understand and correctly apply these limitations.
Cost-of-Living Adjustments
Financial allocations in the bill also include adjustments for inflation, which are set to be recalculated annually beyond 2025. This measure is designed to maintain the real value of the credit considering inflationary pressures, with adjustments rounded to the nearest $50 increment. While this is practical for maintaining value parity over time, it introduces a complexity that requires clear guidelines to avoid misapplication.
Dependencies and Collaborative Efforts
The responsibility assigned to multiple agencies to maintain an updated list of qualified improvements introduces another layer of bureaucratic dependency, which can potentially slow down processes or create inconsistencies if not efficiently managed. Furthermore, the reliance on various governmental bodies to publicize and facilitate access to this credit underscores the significance of coordination and outreach efforts to maximize the bill's intended impact.
The stipulation that restricts married individuals who file separately from claiming this credit could also hinder access for certain demographic groups, particularly those who file separately due to unique financial or personal reasons. This exclusion strategy, perhaps intended to curb misuse, might warrant reevaluation to ensure equitable access for all taxpayer categories.
In summary, while S. 1315 introduces meaningful financial assistance for home accessibility improvements, it is contingent on multiple factorsâcap restrictions, income-related phaseouts, reliance on agency cooperation, and the necessity for public awareness campaignsâall crucial for the intended reach and effectiveness of the credit.
Issues
The complexity of the income limitation and phaseout calculation in Section 36C(b)(2)(A) could confuse taxpayers due to its multi-step process involving ratios and thresholds, potentially leading to miscalculations and errors affecting eligibility.
The definition of 'qualified improvements' in Section 36C(d)(2) relies on a list maintained by the Secretary, potentially leading to inconsistency or confusion if not regularly updated and effectively communicated, especially given its involvement from multiple government agencies.
The exclusion of married individuals filing separately from the tax credit in Section 36C(e)(4) might be seen as discriminatory or unfair to certain taxpayers in unique financial or personal situations.
The complexity of the language in Section 36C may make it difficult for the average taxpayer, unfamiliar with detailed tax law terminology, to fully understand the provisions, thereby impacting their ability to access the credit.
The requirement for a 'disability certification' as stated in Section 36C(c)(2) could place an undue burden on individuals needing documentation, potentially delaying or limiting access to the credit.
The need for public awareness and outreach in Section 1, combined with cooperation from various agencies as mentioned in Section (e), left the effectiveness and impact of this tax credit highly dependent, introducing potential implementation challenges.
Ambiguity in determining 'reasonable amounts' for qualified home accessibility improvement expenditures in Section 36C(d)(1) could lead to disputes or misunderstandings between taxpayers and the IRS.
The stipulation in Section 36C(e)(1) that tax credit increases must be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50 could complicate implementation without clear guidelines.
Section 36C(d)(3) involving multiple agencies to maintain a list of 'qualified improvements' could result in bureaucratic inefficiencies or delays, affecting the timeliness and comprehensiveness of the list.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Refundable tax credit for certain home accessibility improvements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a tax credit for individuals making home improvements to better accommodate people with disabilities or those over 60 years old. This credit covers 35% of qualifying expenses, with specific caps on the amount and income limits, and includes various accessibility upgrades like ramps and grab bars.
Money References
- â(b) Limitations.â â(1) DOLLAR LIMITATIONS.âThe aggregate amount of qualified home accessibility improvement expenditures taken into account under subsection (a) shall not exceedâ â(A) $10,000 for any taxable year, and â(B) $30,000 for all taxable years.
- â(B) APPLICABLE THRESHOLD AMOUNT.âFor purposes of this paragraph, the term âapplicable threshold amountâ means, with respect to any taxpayerâ â(i) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2), â(ii) $200,000, in the case of a head of household, and â(iii) $200,000, in any other case.
- â(C) APPLICABLE PHASEOUT AMOUNT.âFor purposes of this paragraph, the term âapplicable phaseout amountâ means, with respect to any taxpayerâ â(i) $100,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2), â(ii) $75,000, in the case of a head of household, and â(iii) $50,000, in any other case.
- â(e) Special rules.â â(1) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.âIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2025, each of the dollar amounts in subsections (b)(1), (b)(2)(B), and (b)(2)(C) shall be increased by an amount equal toâ â(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by â(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting âcalendar year 2024â for âcalendar year 2016â in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- Any increase determined under the preceding sentence which is not a multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50.
36C. Credit for certain home accessibility improvements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under Section 36C, individuals can get a tax credit covering 35% of the costs for making home improvements to enhance accessibility for qualified individuals, up to $10,000 per year and $30,000 over several years. These improvements are designed to make the home safer and more accessible, especially for those who are elderly or have disabilities, and include specific modifications like ramps, grab bars, and widened doorways.
Money References
- (1) DOLLAR LIMITATIONS.âThe aggregate amount of qualified home accessibility improvement expenditures taken into account under subsection (a) shall not exceedâ (A) $10,000 for any taxable year, and (B) $30,000 for all taxable years.
- (B) APPLICABLE THRESHOLD AMOUNT.âFor purposes of this paragraph, the term âapplicable threshold amountâ means, with respect to any taxpayerâ (i) $400,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2), (ii) $200,000, in the case of a head of household, and (iii) $200,000, in any other case.
- (C) APPLICABLE PHASEOUT AMOUNT.âFor purposes of this paragraph, the term âapplicable phaseout amountâ means, with respect to any taxpayerâ (i) $100,000, in the case of a joint return or surviving spouse (as defined in section 2), (ii) $75,000, in the case of a head of household, and (iii) $50,000, in any other case.
- (e) Special rules.â (1) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.âIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2025, each of the dollar amounts in subsections (b)(1), (b)(2)(B), and (b)(2)(C) shall be increased by an amount equal toâ (A) such dollar amount, multiplied by (B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting âcalendar year 2024â for âcalendar year 2016â in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- Any increase determined under the preceding sentence which is not a multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50. (2) SUBSTANTIATION.âNo credit shall be allowed under this section unless the taxpayer provides (at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may provide) such substantiation of the taxpayerâs eligibility for the credit allowed under this section (and the amount thereof) as the Secretary may require.