Overview
Title
To allow for greater collaboration between the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the network of Manufacturing USA institutes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about helping two groups, BARDA and Manufacturing USA, work better together so they can make better medicines and be ready for health emergencies, like if lots of people get sick at once. This teamwork is like two friends teaming up to build a super cool project, so they are ready for anything!
Summary AI
S. 1305, known as the “Agility in Manufacturing Preparedness Act of 2025,” aims to enhance the collaboration between the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Manufacturing USA institutes. The bill proposes amending current legislation to allow BARDA to engage more closely with these institutes in biomanufacturing activities. This collaboration seeks to develop and implement new technologies to boost public health and medical readiness, thereby improving the nation's preparedness for health-related emergencies.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled the Agility in Manufacturing Preparedness Act of 2025 was introduced in the United States Senate to enhance collaboration between the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the network of Manufacturing USA institutes. The primary objective is to support the development of manufacturing technologies and platforms that can enhance public health and medical preparedness. This proposed legislation seeks to update the Public Health Service Act to enable BARDA to more effectively engage with these institutes in biomanufacturing missions, aiming to improve the nation's capability to respond to health emergencies.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the language and directives of the bill. There is a concern about the potential favoritism of the Manufacturing USA institutes, as the bill directs BARDA to collaborate with this particular network. This could be perceived as unequal treatment compared to other institutes that could provide similar or better services. Furthermore, the term "strategic coordination" is not defined in the bill, which may lead to ambiguity in its interpretation and challenges in its implementation. Additionally, there is no mention of oversight or accountability measures for the partnerships established, which poses risks related to resource inefficiency and the potential misuse of taxpayer funds. The complexity of the language, with nested clauses and amendments, may also hinder a comprehensive understanding of the bill for those it affects or those responsible for executing its provisions.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill aims to enhance the nation's readiness to respond to public health emergencies by leveraging advanced manufacturing technologies. If successfully implemented, these collaborations could lead to faster and more efficient development and deployment of medical countermeasures, potentially saving lives during health crises. However, if the issues of oversight and accountability are not addressed, there exists a risk of inefficient allocation of resources, which could detract from the bill's intended benefits.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders in the biomedical and manufacturing sectors, the bill could present significant opportunities. Manufacturing USA institutes, in particular, stand to gain from potential increased funding and collaboration engagement with BARDA. This could lead to advancements in manufacturing technologies specific to the health sector, enhancing the institutes' profiles and capabilities.
On the contrary, other research and development entities outside of the Manufacturing USA network might find this directive limiting, as they may not access the same level of collaboration opportunities. This could raise concerns over competitive fairness in the industry.
Government agencies responsible for oversight may face challenges if accountability measures are not explicitly defined, potentially putting them under scrutiny for resource management and transparency in the implementation of the bill's provisions.
Issues
The directive in Section 2 to 'collaborate with the network of Manufacturing USA institutes' could be seen as favoring this network over others, raising potential issues of fairness and impartiality in selection criteria.
Section 2 lacks definitions and explicit language, particularly regarding 'strategic coordination,' which may lead to ambiguous interpretations and implementation challenges.
There is no explicit mention of oversight or accountability measures in Section 2 for collaborations with the Manufacturing USA institutes, which poses a risk of uncontrolled or inefficient use of resources and taxpayer funds.
The language of Section 2 is complex due to nested clauses and multiple amendments within a single sentence, potentially making it difficult for stakeholders to fully understand the changes and their implications.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act provides its official short title, which is the “Agility in Manufacturing Preparedness Act of 2025”.
2. Increasing BARDA strategic initiatives Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Public Health Service Act is being updated to enhance BARDA's strategic initiatives by including manufacturing technologies and platforms. Additionally, it allows BARDA to work with the network of Manufacturing USA institutes to develop technologies for better public health and medical readiness.