Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research, to publish guidelines and best practices for State zoning and local zoning frameworks, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Housing Supply Frameworks Act" is a new rule to help more homes get built by asking smart people to make better building rules, and the government is giving them $3 million a year to do this.
Summary AI
S. 1299, known as the “Housing Supply Frameworks Act,” directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to work through the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research to create guidelines and best practices for state and local zoning laws. These guidelines aim to address the significant housing shortage in the United States by overcoming regulatory barriers and encouraging the development of affordable housing. The bill involves consulting with various stakeholders like planners, housing advocates, and community members, and it provides funds from 2026 to 2030 to support these efforts. It also repeals a previous regulatory clearinghouse to streamline processes and focuses on collaboration between federal, state, and local governments to address housing needs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed bill, titled the Housing Supply Frameworks Act, seeks to address the persistent housing shortages facing the United States. The bill directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), through the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research, to publish guidelines and best practices for both state and local zoning frameworks. These guidelines aim to alleviate regulatory barriers and foster housing production that meets diverse income levels across various communities. The bill highlights the federal government's supportive role in reforming zoning laws and specifically identifies land use regulation as critical in ensuring fair housing opportunities. Additionally, it authorizes funding for implementing such measures and proposes the abolishment of the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues arise from this legislative proposal:
Ambiguous Fund Allocation: The bill authorizes $3,000,000 each year from 2026 to 2030 without specifying exact spending objectives or projects. This lack of detail could lead to inefficient use of funds.
Lack of Metrics for Success: The absence of specific criteria to gauge the impacts of the zoning reforms complicates determining the effectiveness of the guidelines, particularly in evaluating how many building permits have been issued as a result.
Abolishment of Support Structure: The termination of the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse, without offering an alternative mechanism for regulatory support, could leave a void in resources that previously helped address barrier-related challenges.
Technical Language: The bill uses highly technical jargon that might be inaccessible to the lay public, posing challenges to broader understanding and participation.
Potential for Inconsistent Implementation: Without standardized metrics or criteria for certain exemptions, like the appeals process, there is a risk of uneven application of the guidelines across different states.
Impact on the Public
The bill's primary goal is to increase housing supply by easing zoning restrictions, which could lead to more affordable housing options for many Americans. It aims to create a systematic approach to managing housing policy by promoting regulatory reforms at the state and local levels. By focusing on creating housing opportunities for a broad spectrum of income levels, it theoretically helps ensure more equitable access to housing.
However, the impact of this initiative could be diminished by the ambiguity in implementation and measurement of success. Public understanding and engagement may suffer due to the technical nature of the language used in the bill. The extensive timeframe for reporting outcomes also poses risks of delayed accountability and improvements.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State and Local Governments: These entities might benefit from additional resources and support to modernize and streamline their zoning regulations. However, without clear guidelines or metrics, they might struggle with inconsistent application or effective implementation.
Housing Developers: Developers stand to gain from less restrictive zoning ordinances that could allow for more diverse types of housing development. Yet, the lack of clear exemption criteria for appeals might introduce regulatory uncertainty.
Communities and Residents: For residents, especially those from economically distressed areas, the reforms could lead to improved access to diverse housing options. However, efforts to engage the community, such as through virtual meetings, might inadvertently exclude individuals without technological access.
Affordable Housing Advocates: While the bill focuses on easing regulatory barriers, advocates may be concerned about the lack of detailed accountability measures or specific goals regarding affordability targets.
The Housing Supply Frameworks Act represents an ambitious attempt to tackle a nationwide housing shortage by addressing regulatory challenges. However, to fully realize its potential, the legislation needs more detail on fund allocation, clearer success metrics, and an accessible approach to ensure broad understanding and engagement.
Financial Assessment
The bill identified as S. 1299, the "Housing Supply Frameworks Act," contains specific financial provisions aimed at supporting its objectives to reform state and local zoning frameworks for housing. It authorizes an appropriation of $3,000,000 annually for the fiscal years 2026 through 2030, to be directed towards the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for carrying out the activities mandated by the Act.
Financial Allocations
The bill sets a fixed budget of $3,000,000 per year for a five-year period to fund these activities. This funding is indicative of the federal government's commitment to supporting the creation of guidelines and best practices to address housing shortages through improved zoning laws.
Connection to Identified Issues
Several issues arise in the context of these financial provisions:
Lack of Specificity in Fund Allocation: One of the primary concerns is the absence of detailed projects or objectives tied to the authorized funds. The broad allocation without breakdowns on spending methodology raises potential concerns about accountability. Without clear guidelines on how the $3,000,000 annual allocation will be spent, there is a risk of inefficient or ineffective use of funds.
Potential for Lack of Accountability: The bill does not specify oversight or audit mechanisms within the appropriations section. This absence could lead to a lack of accountability regarding how funds are utilized, compounding the concerns about financial oversight articulated in Section 7.
Broad Directives Without Budget Clarity: While the bill outlines numerous directives for zoning framework improvements, it does not specify how the annual funding will cater to these expansive directives. This gap may result in uneven implementation across regions, as not all areas may receive the necessary financial support needed to implement the changes effectively.
Long Reporting Timelines: The bill stipulates a reporting requirement on the adoption of zoning frameworks and their impact not later than five years after guideline publication. This extended timeline may defer visibility into the financial effectiveness of the appropriations until well after they have been made, which might limit timely adjustments or corrections to financial strategies.
Overall, while the appropriations outlined provide a financial foundation for the Act's objectives, a more detailed approach to fund allocation and rigorous oversight could enhance the efficacy and accountability of how financial resources are employed.
Issues
The bill authorizes a fixed amount of $3,000,000 annually for five years without detailing specific projects or objectives. This lack of specificity regarding the allocation of funds could lead to potential waste and lack of accountability in Section 7.
The absence of specific metrics or criteria to measure the 'effect of such adoptions on the number of building permits issued' in Section 5 may lead to ambiguous interpretations and difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of the guidelines.
The abolishment of the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse in Section 6 lacks a rationale and does not specify any replacement mechanisms or processes for addressing regulatory barriers, potentially leading to gaps in support.
Section 4 contains broad directives for State and local zoning frameworks without specifying funding sources or budget caps, which could result in wasteful spending and uneven implementation across different regions.
The lack of specific qualifications and a standardized metric for communities to be exempted from the appeals process in Section 4(c)(2)(P)(ii) could lead to inconsistent application across states, raising concerns about fairness and clarity.
The timeframe of 'not later than 5 years' for reporting on zoning framework adoptions and impacts in Section 5 might be excessively lengthy, potentially hindering timely oversight and improvements.
The language throughout the bill, particularly in Sections 2 and 4, is highly technical, which may be difficult for the general public and non-specialists to understand, limiting broader engagement and transparency.
The task force outlined in Section 4 lacks specific details on selection criteria for its members, leading to concerns about favoritism or biased representation.
The absence of oversight or audit mechanisms in Section 7 to ensure that appropriated funds are spent effectively raises accountability concerns.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 1, this Act is given the official name "Housing Supply Frameworks Act."
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress identifies several issues related to the housing shortage in the United States, including high construction costs, labor shortages, and local regulations like zoning laws that make it difficult to build new homes. While some state and local governments are seeking solutions, the Federal Government could offer support, especially to ensure that zoning laws do not unjustly restrict housing opportunities for different economic groups.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the act, including "affordable housing," which refers to housing costs that don't exceed 30% of a household's income, and specifies roles like the "Assistant Secretary" and the "Secretary" of Housing and Urban Development. It also defines "local zoning framework" as local rules for zoning and land-use and "State zoning framework" as statewide guidelines for local planning and policies.
4. Guidelines on State and local zoning frameworks Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines guidelines for improving State and local zoning frameworks to support housing production for all income levels. It includes developing best practices for zoning, engaging with the public and experts, and considering factors like fair housing, affordability, and environmental impact, with a focus on easing restrictions and promoting diverse housing development near transit and in various community types.
5. Reporting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that within 5 years of issuing guidelines and best practices for zoning, the Assistant Secretary must report to Congress. This report should cover which states and localities have adopted the guidelines, any changes made to state and local zoning frameworks, and the impact on building permits from these adoptions.
6. Abolishment of regulatory barriers clearinghouse Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse, which was created by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, is being eliminated. Additionally, the specific part of the law that established this clearinghouse is also being repealed.
7. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill authorizes $3,000,000 to be allocated annually to the Secretary to implement the Act for the fiscal years from 2026 to 2030.
Money References
- There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this Act $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.