Overview

Title

An Act To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is about changing the size of a big cave park called Mammoth Cave in Kentucky. It says the park can get a little bigger by adding some new land, and it gives permission to spend the money needed to do this.

Summary AI

S. 1277 aims to adjust the boundaries of the Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky. The bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to acquire around 980 acres of land, as shown on a specific map, to be included in the park. It updates previous legislation from 1942 by stating that necessary funds will be provided for this expansion. The bill was passed by the Senate on December 17, 2024.

Published

2024-12-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Engrossed in Senate
Date: 2024-12-17
Package ID: BILLS-118s1277es

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
297
Pages:
4
Sentences:
3

Language

Nouns: 96
Verbs: 18
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 23
Entities: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.00
Average Sentence Length:
99.00
Token Entropy:
4.49
Readability (ARI):
50.29

AnalysisAI

The "Mammoth Cave National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2023" is a legislative proposal that aims to modify the boundaries of the Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky. This bill, identified as S. 1277 in the 118th Congress, was passed by the Senate on December 17, 2024, and seeks to achieve several key changes designed to expand and potentially improve the management of the park.

General Summary of the Bill

The primary objective of this bill is to amend the original act from June 5, 1942, related to the Mammoth Cave National Park. The amendment would allow the Secretary of the Interior to acquire an additional 980 acres of land for inclusion in the park. The specified land is located in Edmonson and Barren Counties, Kentucky. Moreover, the bill removes existing limitations on spending, replacing them with an authorization for "such sums as are necessary" to facilitate this expansion.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill's current language and provisions:

  1. Vague Financial Authorization: By permitting expenditures of "such sums as are necessary," the bill eliminates a fixed spending cap, which could potentially lead to unrestricted financial commitments. This raises concerns about potential overspending and insufficient fiscal oversight.

  2. Limited Transparency: The bill references a map to define the land area for expansion; however, it does not specify how interested parties can access this map. This lack of transparency can hinder public understanding and oversight.

  3. Absence of Cost Estimates: The bill lacks detailed information on the expected costs or budget required for acquiring the proposed land. This omission makes it challenging to assess fiscal responsibility, essential for evaluating whether the land purchase is a judicious allocation of taxpayer resources.

Impact on the Public

The public could experience both positive and negative impacts from this legislation. On the positive side, expanding the park's boundaries may lead to improved recreational opportunities and conservation efforts, potentially enhancing the overall visitor experience and local tourism. Conversely, the broad financial discretion allowed by the bill might lead to increased federal spending, which could indirectly affect taxpayers if budget priorities need to be reevaluated due to unforeseen expenses.

Potential Impact on Stakeholders

Local Communities and Businesses: Expanded park boundaries can potentially boost local economies by attracting more tourists, benefiting businesses such as hotels, restaurants, and other service industries. However, there may also be concerns among local landowners about land acquisition and its effects on property rights and local governance.

Conservationists and Environmental Groups: These stakeholders might view the boundary modification favorably as it aligns with efforts to preserve natural landscapes and biodiversity. The acquisition of new land could support environmental protection and rehabilitation initiatives.

Federal Budget Analysts and Policymakers: From a budgeting perspective, the lack of financial specificity presents a challenge. Analysts and policymakers may find it difficult to effectively project and manage federal expenditures related to the park's expansion without precise cost estimates and funding limits.

In summary, while the bill aims to improve the Mammoth Cave National Park by expanding its region and potential funding, careful consideration and additional clarification are needed to address its ambiguities and ensure accountability to the public and stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The amendment authorizes 'such sums as are necessary' (Section 2), which is vague and could lead to potentially uncontrolled spending without a clear upper limit. This lack of specificity in financial requirements could result in overspending and impact budgeting priorities for the park and other federal projects.

  • The language regarding the map of the land to be acquired (Section 2) does not make it clear how the public or legislators can access this map, which is crucial for transparency. Without access to this map, stakeholders cannot visualize or understand the full implications of the land acquisition and boundary changes.

  • There is no mention of the cost or estimated budget for acquiring the 980 acres of land (Section 2), which makes it difficult to assess fiscal responsibility. Without a clear financial assessment, it is challenging to judge whether the land acquisition is a prudent use of taxpayer dollars.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name for the legislation is the "Mammoth Cave National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2023."

2. Mammoth Cave National Park boundary modification Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Mammoth Cave National Park boundary is being modified to allow the Secretary of the Interior to acquire about 980 acres of land as depicted on a specific map, enabling its inclusion in the park. The amendment also removes the previous spending limit and allows for "such sums as are necessary" to be spent.