Overview
Title
To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the use of funds for certain additional Carey Act projects, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to let the government use some of its money to fix, rebuild, or replace old dams. But to do this, the people in charge need to make sure there's already enough money set aside to finish the work on any dams that are started.
Summary AI
S. 1257 proposes amendments to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to make certain additional Carey Act projects eligible for funding. Specifically, the bill allows funds to be used for the rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of certain dams that were developed under the Carey Act of 1894. It establishes criteria for projects to receive funding, including a requirement that any existing projects must have sufficient funding to complete their activities. If these conditions are met, the Secretary is authorized to allocate available funds for these additional projects.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled S. 1257, proposes an amendment to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to enable the use of funds for additional Carey Act projects. Specifically, the amendment allows for the rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of dams developed under the Carey Act, provided certain conditions are met. The Secretary in charge must ascertain that the necessary funding for such activities has been secured and that additional funds remain available for these projects.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue with this bill is the vagueness in defining what constitutes "necessary funding" for dam-related projects. Without clear criteria, there may be room for varied interpretations and potential misunderstandings. Moreover, the bill does not outline how the Secretary will prioritize which dams will receive funding, raising concerns about potential bias or uneven distribution of financial resources. Additionally, the bill relies heavily on the Secretary's determinations without defined guidelines or oversight mechanisms, which could impact transparency and accountability in decision-making. The complex restructuring of legislative sections and subparagraphs could also make it challenging for individuals without specialized knowledge to fully understand the bill's implications.
Public Impact
Broadly speaking, this bill could positively impact public safety and infrastructure by ensuring that older dams, initially created under the Carey Act, receive the necessary updates to meet modern standards. This could prevent potential dam failures and associated risks such as flooding. On the other hand, ambiguities in the bill might lead to challenges in its implementation, possibly resulting in delays or inefficiencies in project execution.
Impact on Stakeholders
For communities living near these dams, the bill could provide significant reassurance about safety and future infrastructure reliability. Rehabilitation or replacement activities could lead to job creation and stimulate local economies. However, the absence of specific criteria or prioritization strategies could mean that some communities might not benefit as expected, especially if funds are not distributed equitably.
From a governmental perspective, the bill's lack of clear guidelines and oversight might complicate the Secretary's role in deciding which projects to fund, potentially leading to criticisms of government inefficiency or partiality. Additionally, stakeholders involved in the legislative process, such as lawmakers and policymakers, might find the bill difficult to navigate due to its complex language and structure, potentially affecting its passage and implementation.
Overall, while the aims of the bill seem beneficial, the lack of detailed procedural guidelines presents concerns that could affect its successful application and the equitable distribution of its intended benefits.
Issues
The section involves an amendment to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act but does not specify clear criteria for what constitutes 'necessary funding' for dam rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement, which could lead to ambiguous interpretations. (Section 1, Subsection 2(A))
It is unclear how the Secretary will prioritize which dams to fund under this amendment, potentially leading to biased or unfair allocation of funds. (Section 1, Subsection 2(A)).
The reliance on determinations made by the Secretary without clear guidelines or oversight raises concerns about accountability and transparency in decision-making processes. (Section 1, Subsection 2(B)).
The language in the bill is somewhat complex, especially regarding the restructuring of paragraphs and subparagraphs, which might make it difficult for non-specialists to understand the implications. (Entire Text).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Eligibility under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of additional Carey Act projects for certain funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allows the Secretary to use specific funds to rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace dams established under the Carey Act, but only after ensuring that necessary funding is obtained and that additional funds are still available.