Overview

Title

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource limit for supplemental security income eligibility.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to change the rules so people can have more money in their bank accounts and still get help from the government if they're struggling. It means they could save more without losing the special money they get for support, and each year, the amount they can save would change a little to keep up with prices.

Summary AI

S. 1234 proposes changes to the Social Security Act to help more people qualify for supplemental security income (SSI). The bill raises the amount of money an individual or couple can have in savings and still be eligible for SSI to $10,000 and $20,000, respectively, starting in 2025. Moreover, these amounts will be adjusted for inflation every year, based on the consumer price index.

Published

2025-04-01
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-04-01
Package ID: BILLS-119s1234is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
503
Pages:
3
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 153
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 26
Entities: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.87
Average Sentence Length:
55.89
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
27.94

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act," aims to amend Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This amendment focuses on updating the resource limits for eligibility in the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. Specifically, the bill raises the resource limits significantly, from $2,250 to $20,000 for individuals and from $1,500 to $10,000 for couples, starting in 2025. Furthermore, the bill ensures these limits will be adjusted annually to account for inflation, using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for urban consumers as a reference.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several points of consideration:

  • Significant Increase in Limits: The resource limits for SSI eligibility are seeing a substantial increase. While this change could provide financial relief for many participants, the rationale behind selecting these new limits is not provided. This increase could lead to higher spending within the SSI program, raising concerns about the fiscal impact.

  • Inflation Adjustment Formula: By tying the annual adjustment of resource limits to the Consumer Price Index for urban consumers, the bill risks adopting an inflation measure that might not perfectly match the inflation experienced by those served by SSI, potentially leading to misalignments in resource adjustments.

  • Complex Legal Language: The legal and financial terminology used in the bill could be challenging for ordinary citizens to understand, possibly impeding public comprehension of how the amendments will impact SSI eligibility and benefits.

  • Limited Detail in Short Title Section: The "Short Title" section is minimal, offering no further insight into the scope or intended effects of the changes, leaving readers without enough context to assess the bill fully.

Public Impact and Specific Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

For the general public, particularly those who are eligible for SSI, this bill could signify a notable enhancement in their access to benefits, given the substantial increase in allowable resources. It may allow participants to save more money without losing eligibility. On the other hand, the increased costs associated with higher eligibility could pressure federal budgets, potentially impacting taxpayer resources.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  1. SSI Recipients: This group stands to benefit the most from the bill. The raised limits might alleviate financial pressures, allowing for greater financial stability without the fear of losing vital support.

  2. Policy Makers and Economists: They may need to further investigate the fiscal implications of this change, given its potential to increase the financial burden on the funding of Social Security programs.

  3. Legal and Financial Advisors: Professionals in these fields may need to prepare to interpret and explain the implications of these changes to affected individuals, given the complexity and technical nature of the legislative language.

In conclusion, while the "SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act" could lead to financial improvements for SSI recipients, it raises considerations about the program's sustainability and calls for a thorough examination of its broader economic impacts.

Financial Assessment

The bill S. 1234, titled the "SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act," proposes significant amendments to the Social Security Act concerning financial eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The primary financial focus of this bill is on increasing the resource limits for individuals and couples who qualify for SSI.

Summary of Financial Changes

The bill proposes increased resource limits starting in 2025, where individuals can have up to $10,000 and couples up to $20,000 in savings and still qualify for SSI. This marks a notable rise from the previous limits of $2,250 for individuals and $1,500 for couples.

Implications of the Financial Changes

  1. Increased Eligibility and Potential Costs: By significantly raising the resource limits, the bill broadens the pool of individuals eligible for SSI benefits. While this change aims to aid individuals who are constrained by the low savings cap, it also raises concerns about the fiscal impact on the SSI program. More individuals qualifying for SSI could potentially lead to increased spending without clear justification for the chosen new limits of $10,000 and $20,000, as highlighted in the issues section. The rationale behind these specific amounts is not discussed within the bill, leaving their adequacy and financial sustainability open to debate.

  2. Annual Inflation Adjustments: The bill incorporates an inflation adjustment mechanism that will modify the resource limits based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U). This approach is intended to keep the limits relevant to economic conditions. However, using the CPI-U may not accurately represent the inflationary pressures experienced by those served by the SSI program. If the CPI-U does not reflect their specific economic realities, it could lead to adjustments that are either too high or too low, affecting the program's fairness and budgetary alignment.

Complexity and Public Understanding

While these financial provisions aim to eliminate the so-called "savings penalty" faced by SSI recipients, the complexity of legal references and the mathematical formula used for inflation adjustment can obscure public understanding. For individuals unfamiliar with legislative or financial language, comprehending these changes and their implications might be challenging.

Moreover, the short title "SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act," while indicative of the bill's intent, provides no additional context or details about the financial specifics within the text. This lack of detail could hinder transparency and prevent a deeper public understanding of how these financial modifications will impact those eligible for SSI and the program's overall fiscal health.

In summary, while S. 1234 seeks to address financial barriers for SSI recipients, it necessitates careful consideration of its potential economic impact and the clarity with which these changes are communicated to the public.

Issues

  • The significant increase in resource limits from $2,250 to $20,000 for individuals and from $1,500 to $10,000 for couples in Section 2 may lead to increased spending without a clear justification for choosing these specific amounts. This change could have substantial financial implications and require careful consideration of the fiscal impact on the supplemental security income program.

  • The implementation of an inflation adjustment formula based on the consumer price index for urban consumers in Section 2 may not accurately reflect the inflation experienced by the demographic served by the supplemental security income program. This could lead to either insufficient or excessive adjustments to the resource limits, impacting the fairness and financial stability of the program.

  • The use of complex mathematical language and references to specific sections of the law in Section 2 may make it challenging for individuals unfamiliar with legal or financial terminology to comprehend the implications of these changes. This could hinder transparency and public understanding of the modifications to the supplemental security income eligibility criteria.

  • Section 1 only states the short title 'SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act' without providing any additional information or detail about the content or implications of the bill. This lack of detail prevents any meaningful audit of potential issues or understanding of the bill's purpose and expected outcomes.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces the Act, which is named the “SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act”.

2. Update in eligibility for the supplemental security income program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the resource limits for the Supplemental Security Income program, increasing them to $20,000 for individuals and $10,000 for couples starting in 2025, with adjustments for inflation each year after that. The inflation adjustment is based on changes in the consumer price index, ensuring the amounts keep pace with economic changes.

Money References

  • (a) Update in resource limit for individuals and couples.—Section 1611(a)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking “$2,250” and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting “$20,000 in calendar year 2025, and shall be increased as described in section 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.”; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking “$1,500” and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting “$10,000 in calendar year 2025, and shall be increased as described in section 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar year.”. (b)