Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the clean vehicle credit.

ELI5 AI

Congress is thinking about stopping a money helper called the "clean vehicle credit" that helps people buy electric cars, which might make these cars cost more. This change would apply to cars bought after the new rule is passed.

Summary AI

S. 1229 proposes to change the Internal Revenue Code by removing the clean vehicle credit, which currently offers financial benefits for purchasing electric vehicles. The bill, introduced in the Senate by Mr. Paul, aims to end these subsidies by amending several sections of tax law. If passed, the repeal would apply to vehicles put into service after the enactment of the act. The legislation aligns with its short title, the "End Taxpayer Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Act," reflecting its primary objective.

Published

2025-04-01
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-04-01
Package ID: BILLS-119s1229is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
514
Pages:
3
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 148
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 32
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.75
Average Sentence Length:
30.24
Token Entropy:
4.40
Readability (ARI):
14.62

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill titled the "End Taxpayer Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Act" aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 specifically by repealing the clean vehicle credit. This credit primarily provides tax incentives for individuals and businesses to purchase electric vehicles (EVs), thereby supporting the broader adoption of clean and environmentally-friendly technologies. The repeal is intended to remove section 30D from the Code, along with various adjustments to related sections to maintain legislative consistency. Upon enactment, the new regulation will be effective for vehicles placed into service during any calendar year that starts after the adoption of the Act.

Summary of Significant Issues

One significant issue regarding this bill is the potential financial implications it poses for consumers and manufacturers relying on the clean vehicle credit. By repealing these subsidies, the upfront costs for purchasing electric vehicles could increase, potentially slowing the progress towards cleaner transportation alternatives. Additionally, ambiguity exists regarding the effective date as amendments apply to vehicles introduced into service starting after the Act's enactment—creating confusion for vehicles placed into service within the same year leading to the legislative change.

The bill also involves removing or adjusting several sections and subparagraphs within the existing code, yet does not supply comprehensive explanations of these alterations. This could make it difficult for those not deeply familiar with legal terminology to fully grasp the extent of the proposed changes. Furthermore, the language referring to "laws as in effect on the day before the date of enactment" introduces potential ambiguity, which might lead to legal challenges if modifications occur in referenced sections post-enactment.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the repeal of the clean vehicle credit could result in increased costs for electric vehicles, as the incentive that offsets the higher upfront purchase costs would no longer be available. This might slow the transition from traditional gasoline-powered vehicles to more environmentally friendly options, impacting broader goals related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fighting climate change. As EVs become relatively more expensive, interest in and adoption of these technologies might decline.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Manufacturers of electric vehicles could be negatively affected by this bill. Without the incentive of tax credits to make their vehicles more affordable, they might experience a decrease in demand—challenging their business model and market projections. Companies involved in the electric vehicle supply chain, including those producing batteries and charging infrastructure, could indirectly be impacted by reduced consumer spending on EVs.

Conversely, taxpayers concerned about expenditure allocated to subsidies might view this legislative move positively as it intends to cut spending associated with promoting specific technologies. However, the short-sightedness of such fiscal concerns may impact long-term economic and environmental wellbeing, stunting advancements towards sustainable development and clean energy transitions.

Overall, the bill creates a landscape of fiscal conservatism at the potential cost of halting progress towards environmental improvements and technological adoption critical for future sustainability. The broader implications for stakeholders necessitate careful evaluation of both immediate and long-term impacts to fully understand the potential outcomes of this legislative change.

Issues

  • The bill proposes to repeal the clean vehicle credit, which could have significant financial implications for consumers and manufacturers who benefit from these subsidies. Without this credit, the cost of electric vehicles may increase, potentially slowing the adoption of clean technologies (Section 2).

  • There is an ambiguity regarding the effective date mentioned in the bill, as it states the amendments apply to vehicles placed in service during any calendar year beginning after the date of enactment. This creates potential confusion regarding vehicles placed into service in the same year as the enactment but prior to the bill's enactment (Section 2, subsection c).

  • The bill strikes several sections and subparagraphs of the Internal Revenue Code without providing detailed explanations of their contents, making it challenging for those unfamiliar with such legal terminology to fully understand the full extent of the modifications being proposed (Section 2, subsections a and b).

  • The language in the bill makes frequent references to the state of laws "as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment," which can lead to further ambiguity if any changes occur in the referenced sections after the bill’s introduction. This lack of clarity could lead to legal disputes or misinterpretations (Section 2, subsections b(3) and b(6)).

  • The short title section does not provide any substantive information about the Act's contents or implications, potentially making it less transparent to legislators and the public who wish to understand the bill's purpose and impact (Section 1).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act establishes that its official title is the “End Taxpayer Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Act.”

2. Repeal of clean vehicle credit Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes to repeal the clean vehicle credit by removing section 30D from the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and making several related changes to other sections to ensure consistency. These changes will take effect for vehicles placed in service after the new law is enacted.