Overview

Title

To designate as wilderness certain Federal portions of the red rock canyons of the Colorado Plateau and the Great Basin Deserts in the State of Utah for the benefit of present and future generations of people in the United States.

ELI5 AI

S. 1193 wants to keep some pretty places in Utah safe so animals and plants can live there happily, and people can enjoy them now and later, but it needs to make sure everyone agrees on which places to save and how to take care of them.

Summary AI

S. 1193, also known as the "America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act," aims to designate certain federal lands in Utah's red rock canyons and deserts as wilderness areas. The bill covers areas in regions like the Colorado Plateau and the Great Basin Deserts, highlighting their ecological, cultural, and scenic importance. It provides specific protections for these lands to ensure their preservation for future generations, while also respecting the rights of Indigenous communities and maintaining existing rights for activities like grazing. The bill restricts activities like mining and road constructions in these designated wilderness areas.

Published

2025-03-27
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-27
Package ID: BILLS-119s1193is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
23
Words:
7,947
Pages:
41
Sentences:
352

Language

Nouns: 2,559
Verbs: 305
Adjectives: 235
Adverbs: 276
Numbers: 634
Entities: 1,012

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.99
Average Sentence Length:
22.58
Token Entropy:
5.21
Readability (ARI):
11.59

AnalysisAI

The "America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act" introduced in the 119th Congress seeks to designate certain federal portions of Utah's red rock canyons as wilderness areas. The aim is to preserve these lands for the cultural, ecological, and scenic benefits they offer to present and future generations. By creating official wilderness zones, the bill intends to protect the natural beauty and cultural heritage of the region, while preserving spaces for traditional practices like hunting and hiking.

Significant Issues

Lack of Financial Transparency

One of the major issues with the bill is its lack of detailed financial information and cost analysis. This absence raises concerns about potential wasteful spending or misallocation of resources. Without clear financial guidelines, the execution of the bill's provisions might lack necessary scrutiny, creating challenges in effective implementation.

Criteria for Wilderness Designation

Another notable concern is the absence of specific criteria or rationale for selecting particular areas as wilderness. Transparency is crucial for accountability, and the bill's lack of clear guidelines on how these designations are determined could lead to suspicions of arbitrary decision-making or favoritism.

Management and Enforcement Plans

The bill lacks detailed plans for managing and enforcing the rules in the newly designated wilderness areas. This gap raises questions about how the intended environmental and cultural benefits will be preserved and enforced. Without clear management strategies, the potential for preserving the wilderness areas as envisioned could be compromised.

Withdrawal from Land Use

The bill discusses withdrawing certain lands from forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal but does not clearly define these terms, potentially affecting current land rights and usages. This vagueness could lead to conflicts or disputes with landowners or users who might be affected by these changes.

Broad Public Impact

By designating these areas as wilderness, the bill could impact a wide range of stakeholders, from conservationists who support preserving natural landscapes to local communities concerned about restrictions on land use. For the broader public, the act could mean enhanced protection for ecologically and culturally significant lands, aligning with broader environmental goals.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impact: Environmentalists and conservation groups might see this bill as an important step forward in protecting the U.S.'s natural landscapes. By preserving the wilderness areas, these groups hope to protect biodiversity and combat the effects of climate change.

Negative Impact: On the other hand, local communities and industries might view the new designations negatively, especially if they depend on the land for economic activities like livestock grazing, mining, or recreation. The bill's unclear provisions could lead to uncertainties regarding land use, creating potential economic difficulties for these stakeholders.

Overall, while the "America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act" seeks to secure natural and cultural treasures for the nation, its lack of clarity in financial implications, criteria for designation, and management plans could lead to challenges in practical implementation and stakeholder satisfaction.

Issues

  • The bill lacks detailed financial information and cost analysis. Sections 1, 101, 102, 104, and 204 highlight this absence, potentially leading to wasteful spending and misallocation of resources without proper scrutiny.

  • The bill does not specify criteria or rationale for selecting specific areas for wilderness designation, which is crucial for transparency and accountability. Sections 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, and 109 all suffer from this lack of clarity.

  • The absence of detailed management and enforcement plans for designated wilderness areas raises concerns about preserving the intended environmental and cultural benefits. This issue is noted in Sections 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, and 109.

  • The withdrawal of land from forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal is not clearly defined, potentially affecting current land rights and uses without adequate resolution mechanisms. This is referenced in Section 210.

  • The bill's sections on roads and livestock, particularly Sections 205 and 206, use vague terminology that might lead to inconsistent enforcement and interpretation, risking unintended ecological impacts.

  • The bill does not provide for stakeholder consultations or address how land use designations might affect Indigenous tribes or local communities, as seen in Section 3. This could lead to political and ethical disputes.

  • Specific boundaries and precise geographic data for the designated areas are missing, which could result in disputes with stakeholders and legal challenges. Sections 101, 102, 108, and 109 highlight this issue.

  • The bill references the Wilderness Act and other existing laws without summarizing their provisions. For those unfamiliar, this could limit understanding and lead to misinterpretation, particularly in Sections 101 and 109.

  • Section 204's complex legal language about water rights lacks clarity on sufficiency determination and stakeholder involvement, posing risks of future legal disputes and dissatisfaction.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the "America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act" provides a short title for the act and an organized table of contents, outlining the various parts and specific sections such as definitions, findings, purposes, and the designation and management of different wilderness areas across titles.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the Act, "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior working through the Bureau of Land Management, and "State" refers to the State of Utah.

3. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has identified that the land designated as wilderness in the bill is a significant area of natural and cultural importance. This designation aims to preserve the land's wild nature, support ecological connectivity, help combat climate change, and protect Indigenous cultural sites and practices.

4. Purposes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The purpose of this Act is to declare some areas of Utah as wilderness to benefit current and future generations by protecting the natural beauty and cultural importance of the land, and to ensure that people, including Indigenous communities, can continue traditional activities like hunting, fishing, and hiking there.

101. Great Basin Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has identified several areas in western Utah's Great Basin, known for their natural beauty and unique ecosystems, as places that need protection. These areas, totaling thousands of acres, have been designated as wilderness areas to preserve their natural state according to the Wilderness Act.

102. Grand Staircase-Escalante Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines Congress's intent to protect and manage specific areas within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument as wilderness areas. It specifies the designation of numerous sites across the Grand Staircase, Kaiparowits Plateau, and Escalante Canyons as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System.

103. Moab-La Sal Canyons Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has found that the Moab-La Sal Canyons area, known for its stunning landscapes and natural formations like the Fisher Towers and Westwater Canyon rapids, should be preserved as a wilderness area. The section designates various regions within this area, totaling several thousand acres, as protected wilderness areas under the National Wilderness Preservation System.

104. Henry Mountains Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that the Henry Mountain Range in the United States has retained its wild character and features important habitats for wildlife such as mule deer and free-roaming buffalo. As a result, several areas within the range, including Bull Mountain and Mount Pennell, have been designated as wilderness areas to be preserved under the National Wilderness Preservation System.

105. Glen Canyon Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has identified and designated several areas in Glen Canyon, Utah, as wilderness areas to be protected and managed, including regions like the Dirty Devil River and Dark Canyon, as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System, covering a range of landscapes totaling thousands of acres.

106. San Juan Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that the San Juan Wilderness Areas, including places like Cedar Mesa in Utah, are important for their cultural and ecological significance and need protection. The bill designates several areas, such as Allen Canyon and Valley of the Gods, as official wilderness areas to preserve their unique resources.

107. Canyonlands Basin Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes the immense natural beauty and importance of the Canyonlands Basin area's unique landscapes and ecosystems. To preserve these regions, it designates several areas, including Bridger Jack Mesa, Butler Wash, and Indian Creek, among others, as wilderness areas under the National Wilderness Preservation System, ensuring their protection and conservation.

108. San Rafael Swell Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes the unique natural features of the San Rafael Swell, such as its towering sandstone formations and important wildlife habitat. As a result, various areas in Utah are designated as official wilderness areas to protect and preserve them for future generations.

109. Book Cliffs–Greater Dinosaur Wilderness Areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes the Book Cliffs–Greater Dinosaur Wilderness Areas for their unique natural features and wildlife, and has designated several specified regions within these areas as protected wilderness zones, ensuring their preservation under the National Wilderness Preservation System.

201. General provisions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that every wilderness area named in the bill will be noted on a specific map and recognized by the name given in the bill. After the bill passes, a map and detailed description of each designated wilderness area will be filed with Congressional committees and made available to the public, with legal authority similar to being part of the bill. Any minor errors can be corrected by the Secretary.

202. Administration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that each wilderness area created under this Act will be managed by the Secretary following the guidelines of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Wilderness Act. Existing legal rights at the time the Act is enacted will be respected.

203. State school trust land within wilderness areas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

If state-owned land is turned into a wilderness area by this Act, the Secretary will offer to swap it for U.S. land in the same state of similar value. However, mineral rights can only be exchanged if both sides are willing to trade them.

204. Water Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes that for each wilderness area designated by the Act, a certain amount of water is reserved to ensure the area's needs are met. The Act ensures that this does not change any existing water rights and does not set a precedent for future water rights.

205. Roads Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the rules for measuring setbacks from roads are outlined. Generally, these setbacks vary depending on whether there is wilderness on one or both sides of the road, though exceptions can be made for topographical barriers, fences, and certain disturbances if they align with wilderness management goals.

206. Livestock Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Livestock grazing in the designated wilderness areas is allowed to continue if it was already permitted when this law was passed. However, it must follow rules set by the Secretary that align with both the Wilderness Act and a specific section of the Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990.

207. Fish and wildlife Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Act does not change the State's control over managing and regulating wildlife and fish on public lands within its borders.

208. Protection of Tribal rights Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section ensures that the Act does not change any rights or obligations concerning federally recognized Indian Tribes, protecting both their rights and the United States' responsibilities to them.

209. Management of newly acquired land Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Land acquired by the Federal Government within a designated wilderness area will automatically become part of that area and must be managed according to the laws that apply to wilderness areas.

210. Withdrawal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Federal land mentioned in title I is off-limits to specific activities. These activities include any new entry, appropriation, or disposal as per public law, mining activities such as location and patenting under mining law, and any kind of leasing or material disposition related to minerals and geothermal resources.