Overview
Title
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential addition to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 1187 is a plan asking for a special look at the Deerfield River, to see if it should be on a list of special rivers that are pretty and important. Some people who do nature and river stuff will need to check it out and tell the grown-ups in charge what they find.
Summary AI
S. 1187 is a bill introduced in the Senate to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to study the Deerfield River, which spans Massachusetts and Vermont, to determine if it should be added to the national wild and scenic rivers system. The study must include various branches and major tributaries of the Deerfield River and be completed within three years after funding is provided. The Secretary is required to submit a report to Congress detailing the study findings.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025," aims to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by initiating a study of the Deerfield River for its potential inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system. This plan, introduced by Senators Markey, Sanders, Warren, and Welch, directs the Secretary of the Interior to oversee this study, encompassing the entire Deerfield River, its branches, and significant tributaries in Massachusetts and Vermont. The findings are to be reported to Congress within three years of receiving necessary funds.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several challenges. Firstly, it is criticized for its lack of detailed objectives and an ambiguous timeline. The commencement of the three-year study is contingent upon the availability of funds, without specifying a precise starting point. This could lead to delays and complicate accountability.
In addition, the bill does not include a clear budget outline, which raises concerns about financial planning. Without specific funding allocations, there is potential for either overspending or inadequate financing, impacting the efficiency of the study.
Moreover, the lack of defined criteria for determining the study's success could lead to results that are unclear or incomplete. This could affect decision-making processes regarding the river’s potential designation, which is critical to environmental conservation and local community interests.
Broad Public Impact
The bill could have several implications for the public. The study of the Deerfield River might foster increased awareness of the river's ecological and recreational value, potentially leading to enhanced protection and conservation efforts. However, the lack of clarity and specificity might result in public skepticism regarding the efficient use of resources and the accomplishment of legislative goals.
Broadly, if the Deerfield River is added to the national wild and scenic rivers system following the study, it could result in increased tourism and recreational opportunities, potentially boosting local economies. However, without clear study guidelines and objectives, such outcomes remain speculative.
Stakeholder Impacts
Local communities and governments in Massachusetts and Vermont could see both positive and negative impacts. On the positive side, the designation of the Deerfield River as part of a national system may enhance regional tourism and bolster economic activity, benefiting local businesses and municipal revenues. However, the absence of specific financial commitments in the bill could place unexpected burdens on these communities during the study phase.
Environmental organizations may view the bill’s intentions positively, as it aligns with broader conservation goals. However, they might also advocate for more specific objectives and criteria to ensure the study effectively contributes to the river's protection.
In conclusion, while the bill could lead to positive environmental and economic outcomes, the current ambiguities and lack of detailed planning present immediate challenges that need addressing to ensure effective implementation.
Issues
Lack of detail in objectives and scope: The bill lacks clear objectives and defined scope, particularly in Section 2 where the study of the Deerfield River is mentioned. This ambiguity could lead to execution inconsistencies and unclear results, impacting stakeholders and policy decisions related to environmental conservation and community interests.
Timeline ambiguity and potential delays: Section 2 does not clearly define the start date for the 3-year study timeline, stating 'after the date on which funds are made available.' This could result in delays, leading to uncertainty and lack of accountability in fulfilling legislative goals within a reasonable timeframe.
Financial and logistical concerns: The bill does not provide any detailed budget estimates or funding allocations for conducting the study in Section 2. This lack of financial planning could result in overspending or inefficient use of resources, impacting fiscal responsibility and public financial interests.
Absence of success measures or evaluation criteria: Section 2 does not include specific measures or criteria to evaluate the success or effectiveness of the study. This omission could lead to subjective or inconclusive results, affecting the potential designation of the Deerfield River and its effect on local environments and economies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section is titled "Short title," and it declares that the official name of the Act is the “Deerfield River Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2025”.
2. Designation for study; Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to include the entire Deerfield River in Massachusetts and Vermont, along with its main branches and major tributaries, for study. It requires the Secretary of the Interior to complete this study within three years of receiving the necessary funding and report the findings to Congress.