Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to support upgrades at existing hydroelectric dams in order to increase clean energy production, improve the resiliency and reliability of the United States electric grid, enhance the health of the Nation's rivers and associated wildlife habitats, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to give people a special reward called a tax credit for making improvements to old dam buildings; these improvements can help create more clean energy, make the electricity system stronger, and protect nature around the rivers.
Summary AI
The bill S. 1183 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to encourage upgrades at existing hydroelectric dams. It proposes a 30% tax credit for improvements to hydroelectric facilities, like fish passage, water quality, sediment transport, and dam safety, as long as these upgrades are made before 2035. The bill also defines what qualifies as "hydropower improvement property" and outlines specific criteria such as benefits to wildlife habitats and public waterways, ultimately supporting clean energy production and enhancing the reliability of the electric grid in the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Maintaining and Enhancing Hydroelectricity and River Restoration Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It introduces a new tax credit aimed at supporting improvements and maintenance in existing hydroelectric facilities. The bill's primary objectives are to increase clean energy production, enhance the reliability of the U.S. electric grid, and improve the ecological health of rivers and their wildlife habitats. Key provisions include a 30% tax credit for qualifying upgrades and enhancements at hydroelectric sites, set to apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2025.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major issue with this bill is the potential ambiguity regarding what qualifies as a "qualified dam." The bill extends the definition to include legally operating hydroelectric dams without licenses, which could bypass existing regulatory demands. Additionally, the criteria for an "approved remote dam" specifically exclude regions interconnected with major electric grids, potentially favoring certain remote areas disproportionately. This may exclude areas that might benefit from upgrades but are interconnected with larger grid systems.
Another concern is the technical complexity and the reliance on existing sections of the Internal Revenue Code. This makes the bill rather dense and potentially inaccessible to readers without a background in law or energy policy. Moreover, the requirement for written approvals by 2035 could cause administrative delays, especially if there is a surge in applications approaching the deadline.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, this bill may enhance the national effort toward sustainable and environmentally friendly energy production through improved hydroelectric infrastructure. By offering financial incentives for upgrades, the bill might spur investments in aging dam facilities, leading to increased production of clean energy. This could contribute to a reduction in carbon emissions and bolster energy reliability. However, the complexity and intricacies of the bill may lead to confusion for those not versed in technical or legislative language.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill could positively impact companies operating hydroelectric facilities by providing a financial incentive to upgrade and maintain their sites. These firms stand to benefit significantly from the tax credits, potentially lowering their operational costs while promoting environmentally sound practices. However, stakeholders in regions excluded from the "approved remote dam" designation may find themselves at a disadvantage, as they won't qualify for the same tax benefits.
Additionally, stakeholders advocating for river and wildlife conservation may have concerns about the bill's lack of specific mechanisms to verify environmental benefits, such as fish passage improvements. Without verifiable outcomes, such initiatives might result in ineffective spending, which would be a missed opportunity in ecological conservation efforts.
Overall, while this bill aims to improve hydroelectric infrastructure with ecological benefits, its impact will largely depend on how effectively its provisions are implemented and managed. Administrations responsible for its enforcement will need to tread carefully to address existing ambiguities and operational challenges to maximize its intended benefits.
Issues
The definition of 'qualified dam' in Section 48F(d)(5) might be too broad since it includes hydroelectric dams legally operating without licenses, possibly bypassing certain regulatory oversights.
The requirements for an 'approved remote dam' in Section 48F(d)(1) may disproportionately benefit specific remote areas, excluding major interconnected regions like the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the Eastern Interconnection, or the Western Interconnection.
The reference to existing sections and rules of the Internal Revenue Code in Section 2 and the technical language used throughout can lead to difficulties in understanding for laypersons unfamiliar with legal or hydropower sectors.
Section 48F(a) and (b) might create administrative inefficiencies due to the requirement of written approval before January 1, 2035, which could lead to a rush of applications as the deadline approaches.
There is no specified mechanism in Section 48F(c)(1)(A) to ensure that improvements like 'fish passage' genuinely lead to the intended environmental outcomes, potentially leading to ineffective spending.
The amendment assumes familiarity with the Internal Revenue Code as referenced in Section 2(b)(1) and other cross-references, potentially complicating understanding without additional context.
The provision for 'obsolete river obstruction' in Section 48F(c)(1)(F) requires cross-referencing another Act, complicating understanding without proper context.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title for the act, which is called the “Maintaining and Enhancing Hydroelectricity and River Restoration Act of 2025.”
2. Credit for maintaining and enhancing hydroelectric facilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text adds a new section, 48F, to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, allowing a 30% tax credit for improving or maintaining hydroelectric facilities with certain features, like enhancing fish passage or public access. It also revises specifications for eligible properties and the circumstances under which taxpayers can elect payments or transfer credits, applying to property placed in service from 2026 onward.
48F. Credit for maintaining and enhancing hydroelectric facilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a new 30% tax credit for taxpayers who upgrade, maintain, or enhance hydroelectric facilities to improve environmental and public use standards. It details specific improvements eligible for the credit, such as fish passage enhancements, water quality improvements, and dam safety upgrades, and establishes criteria for what qualifies as hydropower improvement property, including receiving proper approvals before January 1, 2035.