Overview
Title
An Act To require the Secretary of Commerce to establish the National Manufacturing Advisory Council within the Department of Commerce, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about creating a special group called the National Manufacturing Advisory Council, which will help the government and factories work together to solve problems and make America a great place to build things. This group will meet to talk about improving factories and may stop meeting after five years.
Summary AI
S. 1153 aims to create the National Manufacturing Advisory Council within the Department of Commerce. This Council will act as a forum for the manufacturing sector and the federal government to discuss challenges and propose solutions related to workforce, supply chain, and regulatory issues. It will also provide annual strategic recommendations to ensure the U.S. remains a top destination for manufacturing investment. The Council will consult various stakeholders and produce reports, all without requiring additional funding, and is scheduled to disband five years after its first meeting.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "National Manufacturing Advisory Council for the 21st Century Act," aims to establish the National Manufacturing Advisory Council within the Department of Commerce. Its mission is to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce on various issues affecting the manufacturing sector in the United States. These issues include workforce management, supply chain challenges, and technological developments. The Advisory Council will consist of a diverse set of members, including those from private industry, academia, and labor groups. The bill mandates yearly submissions of a national strategic plan on manufacturing to Congress and sets a five-year lifespan for the council unless reauthorized.
Significant Issues
Several issues have been identified within the bill's framework. A notable concern is the lack of clear accountability mechanisms for the Advisory Council. The bill mandates the development of a national strategic plan but omits specific performance evaluations or other reporting requirements to measure the council's impact and efficiency.
The bill's provision for the Advisory Council's termination is time-based rather than performance-based, which might prematurely end an effective body or allow an ineffective one to persist without review. Additionally, the compensation structure for the council members is undefined, potentially leading to financial ambiguities.
The transition of responsibilities from the existing United States Manufacturing Council to the new Advisory Council is not clearly outlined, which could cause overlap and confusion during the transition phase. Moreover, the wide array of inter-agency consultations required to establish the council could introduce bureaucratic delays, as no clear timelines or procedures are provided.
The language used to describe membership criteria is vague, particularly regarding achieving a "balance of backgrounds, experiences, and viewpoints," potentially affecting the selection process's diversity and representativeness. Finally, there is a concern about a lack of mechanisms to ensure public accountability and transparency in the council’s operations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could influence the United States' manufacturing landscape by coordinating efforts to boost competitiveness and resolve ongoing challenges. For the general public, potential benefits could include a stronger economy driven by a more robust manufacturing sector, possibly leading to job creation and technological advancements.
However, without defined accountability and performance metrics, there is a risk that the Advisory Council may not effectively address the needs of the manufacturing sector or the broader economy. This inefficiency could hinder potential public benefits and undermine trust in governmental efforts to bolster manufacturing.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Manufacturers stand to gain directly from the establishment of the Advisory Council, as it promises a structured approach to resolving industry challenges and fostering a favorable business environment. This could be particularly beneficial for small and medium-sized enterprises that often lack the resources to navigate complex regulatory or economic landscapes independently.
For workers within the manufacturing sector, the council's focus on workforce development, training, and education could enhance job opportunities and career advancement potential. However, if the council lacks effective oversight or clear objectives, these benefits may not fully materialize.
Government agencies might experience increased coordination and collaboration as part of this initiative. Still, the lack of clear protocols could result in bureaucratic inefficiencies that diminish the intended collaborative benefits.
In summary, while the proposed bill holds potential for positive impacts across the manufacturing sector, its effectiveness will largely depend on addressing the identified issues of accountability, clarity in procedures, and transparency.
Issues
The lack of accountability measures for the National Manufacturing Advisory Council, such as performance evaluations or reporting requirements beyond the national strategic plan, could lead to inefficiencies or lack of transparency in its operations. (Section 2)
The termination of the Advisory Council is based on a specific date rather than performance or achievement of objectives, which might result in the discontinuation of an effective council or the continuation of an ineffective one. (Section 2)
The undefined compensation structure for Advisory Council members may lead to ambiguity regarding costs associated with their participation, potentially impacting financial transparency. (Section 2)
The transition of functions from the United States Manufacturing Council to the new Advisory Council lacks clarity, which could result in management issues or duplication of efforts during the transition period. (Section 2)
The requirement for extensive inter-agency consultation to establish the Advisory Council may introduce bureaucratic delays, yet no specific timelines or procedures are outlined, resulting in potential administrative inefficiency. (Section 2)
The vague language in the membership criteria for the Advisory Council, particularly concerning the 'balance of backgrounds, experiences, and viewpoints,' could create ambiguities in the appointment process, possibly affecting the council's diversity and representativeness. (Section 2)
The section does not include explicit mechanisms to ensure public accountability or transparency in the Advisory Council’s operations, which may limit public scrutiny or input. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official name of the act is the “National Manufacturing Advisory Council for the 21st Century Act.”
2. National Manufacturing Advisory Council Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes the National Manufacturing Advisory Council, which will provide advice and recommendations on U.S. manufacturing issues, engage with relevant federal departments and the public, and develop a national strategic plan to enhance the manufacturing sector. The council will have diverse membership, function without additional funds, and will transfer roles from the existing U.S. Manufacturing Council; it will operate for five years from its first meeting.