Overview
Title
To establish clear and consistent biological definitions of male and female.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, some people in the government want to say that being a boy or a girl is decided when a baby is made and that only boys can make sperm and only girls can make eggs. They also say that the way people feel inside, like if they feel like a boy or a girl, won't change these rules.
Summary AI
S. 1147 aims to establish clear and consistent biological definitions of "male," "female," and related terms for use in federal law. The bill, known as the "Defining Male and Female Act of 2025," specifies that "sex" is determined at conception and defines males as individuals with a reproductive system that produces sperm, and females as those with a system that produces eggs. It also states that "gender identity" is not recognized by the federal government as a replacement for biological sex. The bill seeks to set these definitions to ensure clarity in U.S. legislation and federal agency interpretations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Defining Male and Female Act of 2025," introduced in the 119th Congress, aims to establish clear biological definitions of "male," "female," and related terms for use in U.S. Federal law. The proposed legislation prescribes definitions based on biological characteristics existing at conception, emphasizing that gender identity is not recognized as a replacement for biological sex in legal contexts.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Defining Male and Female Act of 2025," seeks to define key terms such as "male," "female," "boy," "girl," "man," "woman," "father," "mother," and "gender identity." It categorizes individuals strictly by their biological and reproductive functions as observed at conception. Importantly, the bill expressly states that gender identity, an individual's internal sense of self, cannot replace or redefine biological sex for federal purposes.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are multiple concerns regarding the bill's approach to defining sex and gender. Firstly, the decision to disregard gender identity as distinct from biological sex could marginalize individuals whose identities do not align strictly with their biology, potentially leading to exclusion within federal recognition. Secondly, defining "male" and "female" based exclusively on immutable biological classifications seems exclusionary to intersex individuals and those who have transitioned gender. Such rigidity may oppose current scientific understandings, which acknowledge the complexity and diversity of gender and sex beyond binary definitions.
Moreover, the language of the bill might conflict with existing federal laws that protect against discrimination based on gender identity, possibly leading to significant legal challenges. Seen as primarily reductive, the bill's definitions do not accommodate persons with variations in sex characteristics, precluding nuanced recognition and protection.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could influence significant sectors, particularly in areas managed by federal policy such as healthcare, education, and employment. By providing legal definitions based exclusively on biology, the bill may restrict protections and accommodations for individuals whose identities do not align with traditional biological classifications. It risks heightening debates on sex and gender, sparking societal and political dialogue about inclusivity and rights.
Stakeholder Impact
Affected Stakeholders:
LGBTQ+ Community: Possibly the most impacted, individuals in this community might see increased marginalization, specifically those whose gender identity is not acknowledged by the bill.
Intersex Individuals: People with variations in sex characteristics are generally not recognized in the binary classification proposed, leading to potential exclusion or misidentification in federal definitions.
Health Professionals and Scientists: Such rigid definitions may clash with medical and scientific communities that recognize the complexity of sex and gender, challenging their ability to advocate for or implement appropriate treatments and policies.
Potential Benefits:
The bill might appeal to those advocating for clear, traditional legal classifications of sex and gender, including certain policymakers and community groups seeking consistency in federal definitions for legislative clarity.
In conclusion, while aiming to provide definitive classifications, this bill stirs substantial contention due to its exclusionary stances on non-binary identities and its potential misalignment with established legal protections and understanding of gender and sex diversity. As such, it poses significant questions regarding intersectionality and rights, warranting careful consideration and discourse.
Issues
The definition of 'gender identity' in Section 9 explicitly disconnects it from 'biological reality' and denies its recognition in federal law, which could marginalize individuals whose gender identity differs from their biological sex and lead to legal challenges due to conflicts with existing anti-discrimination protections for gender identity.
The definitions of 'male' and 'female' as based on 'immutable biological classification at conception' in Section 9 may be exclusionary towards intersex individuals or those who have undergone gender transition, potentially leading to ethical concerns and legal disputes.
The language in Section 9 regarding 'sex', 'male', 'female', and other related terms may not reflect the scientific consensus or modern understanding of gender, which recognizes sex and gender as complex and not strictly binary, thus leading to controversies and challenges from both scientific and social communities.
The absence of recognition for gender identity as a valid classification in Section 9 could result in conflicts with various federal laws and regulations that already provide protections based on gender identity, possibly causing significant legal and policy inconsistencies.
The Section 1 introduction and Section 2 definitions without additional context or scientific insight might provoke political and public debate due to perceived rigidness and lack of accommodation for the diversity and complexity of sex and gender in contemporary society.
The prescriptive nature of the definitions in Section 9 might lead to significant ethical concerns regarding their impact on individuals who do not fit these definitions, potentially infringing on individual rights and exacerbating societal divisions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official title of the legislation is the "Defining Male and Female Act of 2025."
2. Definition of sex, male, female, and related terms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, key terms related to "sex," such as "male," "female," and others, are defined according to biological characteristics. It clarifies that "gender identity" is not recognized by the Federal Government for legal purposes, and it provides specific definitions for terms like "boy," "girl," "man," "woman," "father," and "mother" based on biological and reproductive functions.
9. Definition of sex, male, female, and related terms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several terms related to sex and gender for use in U.S. Federal law, including "male," "female," "boy," "girl," "man," "woman," "father," "mother," and "gender identity," emphasizing that gender identity is not recognized as a substitute for biological sex. It clarifies that "sex" refers to the immutable biological classification as male or female.