Overview

Title

An Act To establish a grant program to provide assistance to local law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Invest to Protect Act of 2023" is a plan to give money to small local police departments to help them get better training and support for their officers, like being good at calming tricky situations and keeping safe. It's like giving schools special prizes to make sure teachers have what they need to do a good job teaching and staying happy, but for police instead of schools.

Summary AI

S. 1144, also known as the "Invest to Protect Act of 2023," aims to establish a grant program within the Department of Justice to support local law enforcement agencies. The bill sets criteria for eligible local governments, which include smaller municipalities or tribal governments with fewer than 175 law enforcement officers. The grants can be used for a variety of purposes, like providing training for law enforcement officers, supporting their mental health, offering retention bonuses, and enhancing recruitment efforts. Additionally, the bill outlines reporting and accountability measures to ensure transparency and efficiency in the use of awarded funds.

Published

2024-12-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Engrossed in Senate
Date: 2024-12-17
Package ID: BILLS-118s1144es

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
2,234
Pages:
14
Sentences:
39

Language

Nouns: 676
Verbs: 165
Adjectives: 135
Adverbs: 21
Numbers: 75
Entities: 87

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.43
Average Sentence Length:
57.28
Token Entropy:
5.23
Readability (ARI):
31.60

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Invest to Protect Act of 2023" aims to support local law enforcement agencies by establishing a grant program, particularly targeting those with fewer than 175 officers. This bill allocates funding for various initiatives including de-escalation and victim-centered training, recruitment and retention incentives for officers, and providing mental health resources. The program also incorporates mechanisms for streamlined grant application processes, transparency in financial allocations, and rigorous audit requirements to prevent misuse of funds. The bill authorizes up to $50 million in appropriations annually from 2025 through 2029 to facilitate these efforts.

Summary of Significant Issues

A notable issue with this bill is its restriction of eligibility to local governments that employ fewer than 175 law enforcement officers. This limitation may prevent larger agencies from accessing potentially beneficial resources, raising concerns about equitable distribution of funds. Additionally, the provision for financial incentives such as signing and retention bonuses lacks detailed oversight, creating the potential for misuse. Moreover, the capped appropriations might not sufficiently adjust for inflation over the proposed period, potentially affecting the program's sustainability.

The bill also imposes strict reporting and audit requirements on small agencies, which could strain their limited resources and capacity to comply. Complex criteria for grant usage could complicate implementation without clear guidance. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed training programs, such as de-escalation training, lacks specified metrics to ensure they achieve intended goals.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The "Invest to Protect Act of 2023" could have a mixed impact on the general public. On one hand, improved training and mental health resources for law enforcement officers could enhance policing practices, leading to safer communities. On the other hand, public confidence may be affected by potential issues of transparency and equitable distribution, particularly if the bonuses and grant usage are not effectively monitored.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Smaller law enforcement agencies stand to benefit from the targeted grants, which could enhance their training and recruitment efforts. However, they may also face administrative burdens due to detailed reporting and audit requirements, potentially diverting attention from core policing responsibilities.

For larger agencies excluded from the funding, potential disparities in resource allocation could arise, leading to challenges if they seek similar improvements independently. The grants' focus on mental health and de-escalation training may positively impact officers by providing critical support, yet the capped funding for education stipends might limit some officers' ability to pursue further development.

Overall, the bill attempts to address important areas within local law enforcement but presents several challenges that could influence its effectiveness and reception among different stakeholders.

Financial Assessment

The "Invest to Protect Act of 2023," represented by bill S. 1144, sets out various financial allocations and spending provisions designed to support local law enforcement agencies. The bill outlines specific uses for grant funds, eligibility criteria for receiving these grants, and accountability measures for monitoring the spending of awarded funds. Here is a detailed exploration of the financial aspects:

Summary of Financial Allocations

The bill authorizes the appropriation of up to $50,000,000 per year from fiscal years 2025 through 2029 to fund the grant program. This financial allocation is intended to provide support for several specified activities, including:

  • De-escalation and victim-centered training for law enforcement officers.
  • Safety training for active shooter situations, handling of illicit drugs, and other high-risk events.
  • Bonuses and stipends such as signing bonuses for new recruits, retention bonuses for existing officers, and stipends for further education in specific fields like mental health.

Analysis of Financial Issues

Bonuses and Oversight

The allocation for signing and retention bonuses raises potential concerns regarding oversight and the efficient use of funds. While these bonuses aim to improve recruitment and retention, they could be perceived as excessive financial incentives if not carefully monitored, which might lead to public concern over the potential misuse of funds. Furthermore, the mandatory disclosure of these bonuses is designed to address transparency but could affect perceptions of fairness.

Grant Eligibility and Distribution

The eligibility restriction limiting grants to local governments employing fewer than 175 law enforcement officers could exclude larger departments that also require financial assistance. This raises questions about the equitable distribution of resources and whether those in greater need, regardless of size, can access necessary funds.

Adequacy of Appropriation Levels

The bill sets an authorization of up to $50 million annually without accounting for inflation or shifting needs over the designated years. As a result, there is a risk that the financial allocations could become inadequate over time, potentially limiting the program's effectiveness and sustainability.

Administrative Burdens

The detailed accountability provisions, such as audits and reporting requirements, could impose significant administrative burdens on smaller agencies. These agencies might lack the capacity to manage these requirements, which could deter their participation in the program and undermine the intended support for smaller law enforcement bodies.

Stipends and Training Costs

The stipends for graduate education are capped at $10,000 or the amount the officer pays, whichever is less. While setting an upper limit is necessary for budget control, it may fail to address the true costs involved in such education, potentially excluding deserving officers from partaking fully. This cap might not align with actual educational expenses, thereby raising concerns about fairness and equity within the force.

In conclusion, while the "Invest to Protect Act of 2023" aims to bolster local law enforcement through strategic financial support, certain provisions regarding bonuses, eligibility, and the cap on stipends could impact the fairness, transparency, and overall effectiveness of the funding allocations. These issues underscore the importance of careful oversight and flexibility to ensure that financial resources are used optimally and equitably across all eligible recipients.

Issues

  • The bill's provision for a 'signing bonus' in subsection (e)(5) and 'retention bonus' in subsection (e)(6) could lead to excessive financial incentives without sufficient oversight, which might concern the public regarding potential misuse of funds. Additionally, the disclosures of these bonuses could affect public perception of fairness and transparency.

  • The bill limits eligibility for grants to 'eligible local governments' with fewer than 175 law enforcement officers (section 2(a)(3)), potentially excluding larger departments that could also benefit from the training and resources, raising concerns about equitable resource distribution.

  • The authorization of appropriations in subsection (k) for $50,000,000 annually from 2025 to 2029 may not account for inflation or changing needs, potentially leading to underfunding in later years, which could impact the sustainability and effectiveness of the program.

  • The audit requirements in subsection (h) could place a significant administrative burden on smaller agencies, which might not have the capacity to handle these requirements, potentially deterring participation and raising issues about the fairness of compliance obligations.

  • Subsection (f) and subsection (h) impose substantial reporting and audit requirements on smaller law enforcement agencies, which may strain their limited resources, potentially reducing their ability to benefit from the grant program.

  • The criteria outlined in subsection (e) for grant usage are extensive and detailed, but the complexity might lead to confusion or inefficient utilization of funds without clear guidance and support to streamline these activities.

  • Concerns arise about the effectiveness and evaluation of de-escalation and victim-centered training mentioned in subsection (e)(1) and (e)(2), as the bill lacks specific outcome metrics or evaluations that ensure these programs meet their intended goals.

  • The plan for streamlined applications in subsection (d) could raise challenges if not effectively implemented, potentially creating barriers for eligible local governments in accessing funds intended to assist them.

  • The bill's stipulations for mental health and social work stipends in subsection (e)(7) set upper limits but might inadvertently exclude deserving officers if the limits do not reflect actual costs, leading to equity and fairness concerns.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the "Invest to Protect Act of 2023" states that the formal name of this law is the "Invest to Protect Act of 2023."

2. Grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed bill establishes a grant program to aid local law enforcement agencies, particularly those with less than 175 officers, by offering funds for de-escalation and other types of training, recruitment and retention bonuses, mental health resources, and more. The program includes measures for streamlined applications, transparency in bonus allocations, regular audits to prevent misuse of funds, annual program evaluations, and ensures grants are not duplicated for the same purposes.

Money References

  • (e) Eligible activities.—An eligible local government that receives a grant under this section may use amounts from the grant only for— (1) de-escalation training for law enforcement officers; (2) victim-centered training for law enforcement officers in handling situations of domestic violence; (3) evidence-based law enforcement safety training for— (A) active shooter situations; (B) the safe handling of illicit drugs and precursor chemicals; (C) rescue situations; (D) recognizing and countering ambush attacks; or (E) response to calls for service involving— (i) persons with mental health needs; (ii) persons with substance use disorders; (iii) veterans; (iv) persons with disabilities; (v) vulnerable youth; (vi) persons who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or trafficking; or (vii) persons experiencing homelessness or living in poverty; (4) the offsetting of overtime costs associated with scheduling issues relating to the participation of a law enforcement officer in the training described in paragraphs (1) through (3), (9), and (10); (5) a signing bonus for a law enforcement officer in an amount determined by the eligible local government; (6) a retention bonus for a law enforcement officer— (A) in an amount determined by the eligible local government that does not exceed 20 percent of the salary of the law enforcement officer; and (B) who— (i) has been employed at the law enforcement agency for not fewer than 5 years; (ii) has not been found by an internal investigation to have engaged in serious misconduct; and (iii) commits to remain employed by the law enforcement agency for not less than 3 years after the date of receipt of the bonus; (7) a stipend for the graduate education of law enforcement officers in the area of mental health, public health, or social work, which shall not exceed the lesser of— (A) $10,000; or (B) the amount the law enforcement officer pays towards such graduate education; (8) providing access to patient-centered behavioral health services for law enforcement officers, which may include resources for risk assessments, evidence-based, trauma-informed care to treat post-traumatic stress disorder or acute stress disorder, peer support and counselor services and family supports, and the promotion of improved access to high quality mental health care through telehealth; (9) the implementation of evidence-based best practices and training on the use of lethal and nonlethal force; (10) the implementation of evidence-based best practices and training on the duty of care and the duty to intervene; and (11) data collection for police practices relating to officer and community safety.
  • (2) REPORT.—If the Attorney General awards grants to the same applicant for a similar purpose, whether through the grant program under this section or another grant program administered by the Department of Justice, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that includes— (A) a list of all such grants awarded, including the total dollar amount of any such grants awarded; and (B) the reason the Attorney General awarded multiple grants to the same applicant for a similar purpose. (k) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section not more than $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029. ---