Overview
Title
To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to establish a 3-year phase-in period for de novo financial institutions to comply with Federal capital standards, to provide relief for de novo rural community banks, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Promoting New Bank Formation Act of 2025" is a plan to make it easier to start new banks, especially in the countryside, by giving them three years to save up enough money and letting them change their plans more easily.
Summary AI
S. 113, titled the “Promoting New Bank Formation Act of 2025,” aims to support the establishment of new financial institutions, especially in rural areas. It mandates federal banking agencies to create a three-year timeline for new banks to meet federal capital standards. The bill also allows these institutions to request changes to their business plans during this period and sets a lower initial leverage ratio for rural banks. Furthermore, it requires a study on the decline of new bank formation over the past decade and proposes amendments to the Home Owners’ Loan Act to facilitate agricultural loans.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Promoting New Bank Formation Act of 2025" is designed to facilitate the creation of new financial institutions, particularly in underserved rural and urban areas that have been adversely impacted by bank closures and consolidations. The bill proposes a three-year phase-in period during which new banks, referred to as "de novo" institutions, can gradually meet federal capital standards. It aims to promote the establishment of new community banks by providing them with certain regulatory reliefs. The bill also plans for a study examining the causes behind the low rate of new financial institution formations to find ways to encourage more of them, especially in areas currently lacking access to banking services.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue within the bill concerns the definition of a "rural community bank," as it references external regulations that could change, making it difficult for banks to consistently qualify under this definition. In Section 4, the lack of clarity regarding which specific federal capital requirements must be met during the phase-in period creates uncertainty for new institutions trying to comply. Additionally, Section 5 allows for automatic business plan change approvals if agencies fail to respond within 30 days, which could lead to risky financial practices being enacted without proper oversight. Moreover, the bill's study on the low number of new financial institutions lacks a clear definition of which agencies are responsible for conducting the study, potentially leading to inefficiencies. Lastly, while the bill identifies significant access issues in Section 2, it does not offer direct solutions, leaving questions about how it plans to address these challenges.
Potential Impact on the Public
The bill is likely to have a mixed impact on the general public. On one hand, by easing the regulatory burden on new banks, it could lead to an improved banking presence in underserved areas, promoting economic development and providing essential financial services to communities that currently lack them. This may be particularly beneficial in rural areas with higher poverty rates and lower median incomes, where added banking services could have a significant positive impact.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Existing banks might view this legislation as increasing competition in areas where they already operate. However, the bill offers clear benefits to potential new entrants in the banking industry, providing them with a more favorable regulatory environment during their initial years. Rural communities stand to gain the most if new banks lead to better services and financial opportunities.
Conversely, federal banking agencies may face challenges implementing the bill, as they will need to develop and enforce new rules and reviews within tight timeframes. If the study on new financial institution formation is not conducted effectively, it may not provide the insights needed to foster increased banking services, particularly in the areas that are most underserved.
Overall, the bill has the potential to positively influence the banking landscape, but its success will largely depend on how its provisions are implemented and whether they effectively meet the needs of underserved communities.
Financial Assessment
The bill titled the “Promoting New Bank Formation Act of 2025” primarily addresses capital-related concerns for new financial institutions but does not involve direct spending or appropriations from the federal budget. Instead, it introduces regulatory frameworks that indirectly impact the financial activities and stability of these institutions.
Financial Aspects in the Bill
Rural Community Bank Definition
Section 3 introduces the term “rural community bank”, defining it as a financial entity with total consolidated assets of less than $10,000,000,000 and located in a rural area. This definition is notable as it sets explicit financial thresholds for banks seeking classification as rural community banks. However, the reliance on external regulations could create future ambiguity, especially if those regulations evolve, impacting how banks qualify under this definition.
Phase-In of Capital Standards
Section 4 mandates that federal banking agencies develop a 3-year phase-in period for new financial institutions to meet federal capital requirements. This provision is crucial as it gives these banks a structured timeline to achieve compliance with capital standards, which are fundamental to their financial health and operational stability. However, the lack of specificity regarding which capital requirements are referenced could create uncertainty for these institutions as they plan their financial strategies.
Rural Community Bank Leverage Ratio
Section 6 delineates a phase-in process for the Community Bank Leverage Ratio for rural community banks, starting with an initial ratio of 8 percent. This metric is financially significant as it determines the amount of capital that a bank must hold relative to its total assets. While establishing a clear initial ratio, the bill does not clarify how this figure was determined, potentially raising concerns about its adequacy and suitability as a financial benchmark for ensuring stability among rural banks.
Relation to Identified Issues
Several issues identified in the bill highlight how these financial components might impact its efficacy and clarity:
- The definition of a "rural community bank" relies on external rules, leading to potential qualification challenges and operational difficulties linked to the financial criteria stipulated.
- The ambiguity surrounding "Federal capital requirements" in Section 4 raises questions about the adequate preparation of new banks for operational stability under these financial stipulations.
- The Section 6 provision on leverage ratios lacks transparency regarding the rationale behind the rate set, possibly affecting how rural banks will perceive and manage financial risk.
The commentary highlights how these financial references shape the regulatory landscape for new financial institutions and outlines potential challenges arising from the legislation's current form. These considerations are crucial for understanding the bill's broader financial implications for impacted communities and regions.
Issues
The definition of 'rural community bank' in Section 3 is contingent upon external regulations which may change, leading to potential ambiguity and operational difficulties for banking institutions trying to qualify under this definition.
Section 4 lacks clarity on which 'Federal capital requirements' are being referred to, making it difficult to assess the implications for new financial institutions and their operational stability.
In Section 5, the provision allowing automatic approval of business plan changes if the agency does not respond within 30 days could result in the implementation of potentially risky or inadequately vetted business strategies.
The study outlined in Section 8 does not define 'appropriate' Federal banking agencies, leaving room for misinterpretation and potential inefficiencies in identifying causes for low de novo financial institution numbers.
Section 6 does not explain how the initial 8 percent leverage ratio for rural community banks was determined, raising concerns about the basis and adequacy of this financial benchmarking.
Section 2 identifies banking access issues but does not propose solutions or articulate how findings translate into legislative actions, leaving it unclear how the Act aims to resolve identified challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill indicates its short title, which is the “Promoting New Bank Formation Act of 2025”.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Congress identifies a concerning trend where bank closures and consolidations are leaving many communities without access to banking services, particularly harming rural areas. Most of these affected rural regions have higher poverty rates and more African-American residents, and new banks are being formed at a much slower rate after the financial crisis.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several financial terms are defined: "appropriate Federal banking agency," "depository institution," and "depository institution holding company" follow their definitions in another law; "Community Bank Leverage Ratio" is defined according to a specific act; "financial institution" is a type of bank or bank holding company; and a "rural community bank" is a small financial institution with assets under $10 billion located in a rural area.
Money References
- (4) RURAL COMMUNITY BANK.—The term “rural community bank” means a financial institution— (A) with total consolidated assets of less than $10,000,000,000; and (B) located in a rural area, as defined in section 1026.35(b)(2)(iv)(A) of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation.
4. Phase-in of capital standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires federal banking agencies to create rules that allow financial institutions a 3-year period to meet federal capital requirements, starting when their deposit insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation becomes effective.
5. Changes to business plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A financial institution can request changes to its approved business plan within three years of its deposit insurance becoming effective. The appropriate Federal banking agency must respond to this request within 30 days, either approving, conditionally approving, or denying it, and if the agency does not respond in time, the request is considered approved automatically.
6. Rural community bank leverage ratio Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
During the first 3 years after obtaining deposit insurance, rural community banks must have a Community Bank Leverage Ratio of 8%. However, the government will allow a gradual increase in this ratio with lower percentages in the first 2 years.
7. Agricultural loan authority for Federal savings associations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Home Owners’ Loan Act to allow Federal savings associations to make both secured and unsecured loans specifically for agricultural purposes. Additionally, it updates the language to focus on business-related loans by removing references to agricultural loans from a specific clause.
8. Study on de novo financial institutions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill mandates that federal banking agencies conduct a study on the reasons behind the low number of new financial institutions over the past decade and explore ways to encourage the establishment of such institutions in underserved areas. The findings must be reported to Congress within one year of the bill's enactment.