Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for payments to certain individuals who dye fuel, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill lets people who color diesel or kerosene get money back for the taxes they paid on those fuels, but there are some rules to make sure they qualify for this.
Summary AI
The bill S. 1111 proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for payments to individuals who dye diesel fuel or kerosene. It specifies that if these individuals meet certain criteria, they can receive payments equal to the previously paid fuel taxes. Additionally, it adds a new section to the tax code, clarifying conditions under which dyed fuels are eligible for a refund and updates several corresponding sections of the tax code to support these amendments. The changes will take effect 180 days after the bill is enacted.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill titled "To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for payments to certain individuals who dye fuel, and for other purposes" was introduced to the Senate in March 2025. The primary intention of this legislative action is to amend the existing tax code to facilitate payments to individuals who dye diesel fuel or kerosene, thereby reimbursing them for certain taxes paid on these fuels. The conditions for these payments include having paid tax under a particular section and the fuel being exempt from taxation under another specific provision. This bill also outlines penalties for excessive claims related to these payments.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major concern with the bill lies in the vague language regarding eligibility criteria. The requirement that eligibility must be established "to the satisfaction of the Secretary" grants considerable discretion to the Secretary, potentially leading to inconsistent or arbitrary decisions. This lack of specificity might result in some individuals receiving unwarranted payments while others who deserve it may be unjustly denied.
Furthermore, the bill uses complex language and numerous cross-references to existing laws, which may hinder understanding and implementation for taxpayers and administrators alike. The definition of 'eligible indelibly dyed diesel fuel or kerosene' is provided, but the absence of a clear process for establishing and verifying eligibility opens up possibilities for fraud and misuse of funds.
The provision that payments will be made without interest could raise fairness issues, as recipients might be unduly disadvantaged by delays in receiving their payments — in contrast with other financial contexts where interest would typically apply.
Impact on the Public
The broader public impact of the bill may be limited, given its specialized focus on individuals and businesses involved in the dyeing of fuel. However, any instances of fraud or misuse of funds could indirectly affect taxpayers, as public resources might be misallocated. Additionally, ambiguity in the bill could result in administrative challenges, which could delay payments or increase the costs associated with enforcing these provisions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For fuel suppliers and entities involved in the dyeing process, this bill presents an opportunity to recover taxes previously paid on certain types of fuel. This could reduce operational costs for qualifying businesses, providing financial relief and possibly leading to reduced prices for end consumers if savings are passed on.
Conversely, the undefined criteria for determining eligibility could result in some qualified entities not receiving payments they are entitled to, while others exploit the system's loopholes. Regulatory bodies may face challenges in administering these new provisions effectively, necessitating increased oversight and potentially diverting resources from other critical tax enforcement activities.
In summary, while the bill aims to streamline tax-related processes for specific stakeholders, its current draft contains several areas that might benefit from clarification and refinement to ensure fair and efficient implementation.
Issues
The bill's provision that payments are based on the establishment of eligibility criteria 'to the satisfaction of the Secretary' (Section 1) is vague and grants excessive discretion to the Secretary, which could lead to arbitrary decision-making and potential misuse of authority.
The definition and process for determining 'eligible indelibly dyed diesel fuel or kerosene' (Sections 1 and 6434) lacks clarity, potentially leading to confusion, misuse, or fraud due to the absence of detailed definitions or references.
The absence of a safeguard or procedure for verifying the authenticity of claims for payment (Section 6434) could lead to fraudulent claims and misallocation of funds, as there is no clear mechanism for accountability.
Not offering interest on payments (Section 6434) might be seen as unfair to recipients, since, in other financial contexts, delays in payment could warrant interest, which could result in legal or ethical concerns.
The effective date, described as '180 days after the date of the enactment' (Section 1), may cause operational difficulties, creating a gap or rush for compliance preparation, thereby posing potential issues for those required to adhere to new regulations.
The complex integration with existing sections of the Internal Revenue Code involving numerous cross-references and amendments (Sections 1 and 6434) may complicate understanding and implementation for both taxpayers and administrators.
Section 6434's mention of a cross-reference for civil penalties under section 6675 lacks detail, potentially leading to confusion or lack of awareness of the consequences for fraudulent claims.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Payment to certain individuals who dye fuel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a new provision to the Internal Revenue Code allowing individuals who satisfy certain criteria to receive a payment equal to the tax paid on certain types of dyed diesel fuel or kerosene. These criteria include the requirement that the fuel must have had tax previously paid and not refunded and must be exempt from taxation, while also outlining penalties for excessive claims.
6434. Dyed fuel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a person can prove they meet certain requirements with dyed diesel fuel or kerosene, the Secretary will refund them the tax they paid on it, as long as it's the specific type of dyed fuel which previously had tax paid under section 4081 and is exempt under section 4082(a). For penalties related to excessive claims, refer to section 6675.