Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
S. 1071 is like a rule that tells a special helper to dig up and move Fernando V. Cota's body from a cemetery in Texas to give it to his family. If his family doesn't ask for it, the helper must figure out what to do with the body in a good way.
Summary AI
S. 1071 is a bill that instructs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to remove the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery in Texas within one year of the bill's enactment. Before this can happen, the Secretary must notify Fernando V. Cota's closest relative about the plan. After removing the remains, the Secretary must hand them over to the next of kin or, if no relative comes forward, decide on another appropriate disposition.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The legislation, titled S. 1071, mandates the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery in Texas. The bill stipulates that the Secretary must notify Mr. Cota's next of kin before proceeding with the disinterment. Once the remains are disinterred, the Secretary is required to hand them over to the next of kin. Should the next of kin not respond, the Secretary is obliged to arrange for a suitable disposition of the remains.
Significant Issues
Several notable issues arise from the provisions outlined in the bill. First, there's a lack of detail concerning the criteria or process by which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs would decide on what constitutes an "appropriate" disposition of the remains if no response is received from the next of kin. This ambiguity could lead to inconsistent application of the policy, potentially resulting in the improper handling of the remains.
Another significant issue is the absence of clarity regarding who will bear the costs of disinterment and any subsequent re-interment or disposition of the remains. This financial uncertainty could affect both the budget of the Department of Veterans Affairs and, potentially, the financial obligations of the next of kin. Furthermore, the bill does not specify what action should be taken if a notified next of kin does not respond to the offer of the remains, which could lead to delays and confusion in their handling.
Lastly, there are no provisions estimating the cost or budgetary implications of these actions, which may impact taxpayers or the financial planning of the department.
Impact on the Public
The bill could have several implications for the general public and specific stakeholders. For the public broadly, this legislation brings to attention the protocols surrounding the disinterment of veterans and the importance of clearly defined processes to avoid any mishandling of remains. The decision of whether costs will be covered by public funds or transferred to private individuals could set a precedent for similar cases in the future, affecting how such circumstances are handled widely.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the next of kin, the bill's uncertainty regarding notification response holds potential consequences. They may have financial responsibilities placed upon them without prior understanding if they do not respond timely to notifications. Furthermore, families may face emotional distress in dealing with the logistical and financial aspects of the disinterment if they are unassisted by the government.
On the other hand, for the Department of Veterans Affairs, this legislation potentially sets a challenging precedent regarding the financial and procedural responsibilities involved in the disinterment and potential reburial processes. Without clear guidelines on the disposition criteria and cost management, the department could face administrative challenges and increased scrutiny.
Overall, while the bill addresses a specific and sensitive matter, it opens up discussions on the need for clear policies and guidelines when dealing with military cemeteries and veterans' final resting places.
Issues
The section 1 lacks detail on the criteria or process used by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to determine an 'appropriate' disposition if no next of kin responds. This could lead to inconsistent application of the policy and potentially mishandling of the remains, which is significant legally and ethically.
The bill does not specify who will bear the costs associated with disinterment and potential re-interment or disposition of the remains. This financial ambiguity could have implications for both the Department of Veterans Affairs' budget and potentially the next of kin, addressed in section 1.
Section 1 does not specify what would happen if a next of kin is notified and does not respond to the relinquishment offer, which could result in delays or confusion about the handling of the remains.
There could be significant costs involved with the disinterment, re-interment, or disposition of remains, yet the bill does not provide any estimates or considerations for budgeting these actions, potentially impacting taxpayers or the department's financial planning, mentioned in section 1.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Disinterment of remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for disinterring the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery in Texas. It requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to notify Mr. Cota's next of kin before disinterment and either return the remains to them or arrange for an appropriate disposition if the next of kin do not respond.