Overview

Title

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify a provision relating to criminal penalties for damaging or destroying pipeline facilities, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act wants to expand rules that say it's bad to mess with pipelines—like breaking, stopping, or messing with them—even if you're not destroying them. This might be tricky because it could make people worry they'll get in trouble for doing something they didn't know was wrong.

Summary AI

S. 1017, titled the “Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act,” proposes changes to title 49 of the United States Code related to pipeline facilities. It aims to broaden the scope of criminal penalties for harmful activities involving pipelines. The bill specifically includes actions such as vandalizing, tampering with, disrupting, or preventing the operation or construction of pipeline facilities, in addition to damaging or destroying them.

Published

2025-03-13
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Introduced in Senate
Date: 2025-03-13
Package ID: BILLS-119s1017is

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
245
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 76
Verbs: 25
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 7
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
30.62
Token Entropy:
4.31
Readability (ARI):
16.84

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The legislation titled the "Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act," introduced in the 119th Congress, aims to amend existing laws concerning the protection of pipeline facilities in the United States. The bill is created to broaden the scope of criminal activities that attract penalties in relation to pipelines. Under current law, penalties apply for damaging or destroying pipeline facilities. This bill seeks to expand these penalties to include vandalizing, tampering with, disrupting, or preventing the operation or construction of pipeline facilities.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill introduces several critical expansions to the law regarding pipeline protections. Firstly, the language in Section 2 broadens the scope to include acts like vandalizing and tampering, which extends beyond the previously narrower focus on just damage or destruction. Secondly, the insertion of terms like "disrupting the operation or construction of" and "preventing the operation or construction of" is notably vague, creating potential for varied interpretations that could affect enforcement. Finally, the term "vandalizing" presents ambiguities regarding its precise definition, as it can encompass actions with varying severity.

Impact on the Public Broadly

Public impact of this bill could be extensive, mainly due to its broad definitions of criminal acts. Individuals involved in protests or who inadvertently interfere with pipeline operations may find themselves facing serious legal consequences under the proposed amendments. This could lead to heightened tensions between law enforcement and communities, particularly those opposed to pipeline projects on environmental or safety grounds.

While the bill aims at increasing security and deterring unlawful interference with critical infrastructure, it could also raise concerns about over-criminalization and restraint on civil liberties. Those engaged in legitimate protests might be affected if their actions fall within the new expanded scope of offenses outlined by the bill.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For energy companies and those involved in constructing and operating pipeline facilities, this legislation could offer an additional layer of legal protection. It may reduce incidents of interference and disruptions, ensuring smoother operations and potential savings on security and repair costs due to vandalism or tampering.

Conversely, environmental activists, indigenous groups, and landowners might view the bill as a threat to their rights to protest and object against pipeline projects. The language of the bill could be interpreted as a tool to suppress dissent and limit public voice in challenging such infrastructure developments.

Furthermore, law enforcement agencies may face challenges in interpreting and enforcing the expanded legal language, potentially leading to legal disputes or requiring additional training and resources.

In summary, while the "Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act" aims to enhance protection of pipeline infrastructure, its broad and vague language may have significant social implications and could incite debates about the balance between infrastructure security and civil liberties.

Issues

  • The expansion of criminal penalties to include 'vandalizing, tampering with, disrupting the operation or construction of, or preventing the operation or construction of' may lead to concerns about over-criminalization and overly broad enforcement. This broad language, found in Section 2, could impact civil liberties, particularly for protestors or individuals inadvertently impacting pipeline operations.

  • The terms 'disrupting the operation or construction of' and 'preventing the operation or construction of' in Section 2 are vague and may lead to inconsistent interpretations and applications, potentially resulting in legal challenges or confusion in enforcement.

  • The inclusion of 'vandalizing' in Section 2 might create ambiguity if it is not precisely defined, as vandalism can encompass a wide range of actions varying in severity. This could lead to disproportionate penalties for minor infractions.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act gives it the official name "Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act."

2. Criminal penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text amends a section of U.S. law to expand the list of criminal activities related to pipelines, adding offenses like vandalizing, tampering with, and disrupting pipeline operations or construction, beyond just damaging or destroying them.