Overview
Title
Expressing strong disapproval of the President’s announcement to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.
ELI5 AI
H. RES. 68 is a message from some people in the government saying they are not happy with the President for wanting to leave a big team of countries working together to help the Earth. They want the President to think again and keep working with everyone to make sure our planet stays healthy and safe.
Summary AI
H. RES. 68 is a resolution expressing strong disapproval of the President's decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. The resolution highlights the threats of climate change to health, economy, and security, and recognizes the international and domestic efforts to combat these effects. It commends states, cities, and organizations supporting the Paris Agreement and urges the President to reconsider the withdrawal and Congress to prioritize global leadership in climate action. The resolution reflects the overwhelming public support for staying in the Paris Agreement and emphasizes the benefits of maintaining a leadership role in clean energy innovation and job creation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The U.S. House of Representatives introduced H. RES. 68, expressing strong disapproval of the President's decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. The resolution highlights the significance of the Paris Agreement as a vital international accord aimed at curbing global climate change by limiting temperature rises. It acknowledges the accomplishments under the agreement, such as the creation of new jobs through recent climate legislation and re-emphasizes the importance of U.S. leadership in mitigating climate change. Furthermore, the resolution commends the states, cities, businesses, and individuals that continue to support the Paris Agreement, and it calls upon both the President and Congress to prioritize the U.S.'s role in addressing global climate change.
Significant Issues
The resolution—while clear in expressing disapproval—suffers from a lack of specificity regarding actionable steps to maintain U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement. The language used is broad and commendatory, focusing on already available support rather than outlining a concrete plan for reintegration or continued participation. This absence of specific instructions could lead to ambiguity in the implementation of the resolution's objectives. Additionally, there is no mention of financial implications, which complicates the assessment of fiscal impacts and the potential for wasteful expenditure.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the resolution aligns with public sentiments, as most Americans reportedly support U.S. involvement in international climate agreements. Upholding the U.S.'s commitments under the Paris Agreement could contribute positively to public health, economic stability, and national security by helping mitigate the effects of climate change. The resolution's endorsement of climate action aligns with public demands for sustainable environmental policies that ensure long-term ecological and economic stability for future generations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For states and cities, particularly those in the U.S. Climate Alliance, the resolution reaffirms their collective efforts to uphold the Paris Agreement's goals. These regions may continue to benefit from federal acknowledgment of their leadership in climate action. Businesses and investors within the clean energy sector might view this resolution as supportive of their ventures, potentially fostering further innovation and investment. On the other hand, sectors that rely heavily on fossil fuels or have interests in deregulation could perceive this resolution as counterproductive to their operations.
In summary, while the resolution serves as a statement of disapproval aimed at guiding the country's climate policy, its broad language and lack of specific legislative directions might limit its effectiveness in producing tangible policy changes. Proponents may view it as a symbolic affirmation of support for ongoing climate initiatives, but without clear action, skeptics might question its ability to counteract the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement effectively.
Issues
The language in the resolution is broad and lacks specific actionable steps or policies for upholding the United States' participation in the Paris Agreement, which could lead to ambiguity in implementation. (Section: Issues - Broad and commendatory language without specifics)
The resolution does not specify how Congress or the President should act to prioritize the United States' global leadership on addressing climate change, risking unclear implementation. (Section: Issues - Ambiguity in prioritization of global leadership)
There is no explicit mention of financial implications or spending in the resolution, which makes it difficult to audit for potential wasteful expenditure or assess fiscal impacts. (Section: Issues - Lack of financial implications)
The resolution largely relies on language commending existing support for the Paris Agreement without detailing mechanisms or legislative steps to navigate the President's withdrawal decision. This may affect its effectiveness in influencing policy change. (Section: Issues - Commendatory language without actionable steps)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The House of Representatives expresses strong disapproval of the President's plan to leave the Paris Agreement, praises those supporting it, and encourages both the President and Congress to prioritize climate change leadership and remain engaged in the international accord.