Overview

Title

Recognizing the historic abolitionist events surrounding the Pearl, and honoring its legacy in American history.

ELI5 AI

In 1848, 77 enslaved people tried to escape using a ship called the Pearl, and even though they didn’t succeed, this bill wants to remember their bravery and the help they got from kind people. It talks about how their story even inspired a famous book called "Uncle Tom's Cabin."

Summary AI

H. RES. 336 acknowledges the historic events involving the Pearl, a schooner used in an 1848 escape attempt by 77 enslaved people from Washington, D.C., and Virginia. The resolution honors the bravery and efforts of those involved in this escape, as well as the abolitionists who aided them, despite the attempt being thwarted. The resolution also highlights the impact of these events on American history, including their influence on Harriet Beecher Stowe's famous novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin."

Published

2025-04-17
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-17
Package ID: BILLS-119hres336ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
135
Pages:
3
Sentences:
5

Language

Nouns: 48
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 3
Entities: 14

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.90
Average Sentence Length:
27.00
Token Entropy:
3.95
Readability (ARI):
18.73

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Resolution 336 acknowledges a significant historical event—the attempted escape of 77 enslaved people aboard the schooner Pearl in 1848. This resolution is largely ceremonial, aiming to honor the individuals involved in this historic abolitionist effort within the District of Columbia. The text of the resolution highlights key figures, both Black and White, who assisted or financed the escape. It recognizes the escape as an important chapter in the struggle for freedom and highlights its influence on American history, particularly in inspiring Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin."

Summary of Significant Issues

While the resolution is symbolic, it raises some issues worth discussing. First, it does not involve any specific government spending, which means there are no financial implications or potential for misuse of funds. This absence of monetary elements makes the resolution clear of fiscal debates but also limits its scope to symbolism rather than concrete action or policy.

Additionally, the resolution focuses on honoring past events without detailing any legislative actions or research impacts, leaving open questions about its practical effects. The absence of commitments means that, apart from providing recognition, the resolution does not create or mandate any future actions or measures, which could spark discussions on its effectiveness in addressing contemporary social issues related to racial justice or historical education.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, House Resolution 336 serves as a reminder of America’s complex history with slavery and the ongoing journey toward justice and equality. By recognizing the escape attempt on the Pearl, the resolution may foster a greater understanding and appreciation of the sacrifices and bravery displayed by those who risked everything for freedom. This event could encourage discussions in educational circles and prompt further interest in learning about lesser-known historical events that have shaped the current social landscape.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For historians and educators, the resolution provides a platform to highlight and promote discussions about historical events that may not be widely covered in traditional curricula. It acknowledges the contributions of both Black and White abolitionists, emphasizing the collaborative efforts required for freedom and social change.

For descendants of those involved in the Pearl escape, the resolution may serve as an acknowledgment of their ancestors’ courage and contributions to American history. Furthermore, this recognition could become part of broader efforts to include more diverse narratives and perspectives in the national historical narrative.

On the other hand, critics may argue that the resolution’s lack of actionable outcomes indicates a missed opportunity to address current racial issues through legislative means. While it brings attention to an important historical event, without accompanying measures or commitments, its impact remains largely symbolic, potentially seen by some as insufficient in driving tangible change.

Issues

  • The section does not mention any specific spending, so there is no way to audit for wasteful spending or spending favoritism. This could be significant for ensuring transparency and accountability in governmental resolutions.

  • The resolution focuses on honoring historical events and figures without detailing legislative actions or impacts, making it difficult to assess the resolution's potential implications or effects. This absence of specificity could be a point of political interest.

  • The ceremonial nature of the resolution does not include commitments or actions, raising questions about the tangible outcomes or measures that are expected from this recognition. The lack of actionable items could be a political concern regarding the effectiveness of the resolution in addressing contemporary issues of racial justice or education.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The House of Representatives pays tribute to the people who fought against slavery and participated in the Pearl incident, acknowledging their significant role in the history of Washington, D.C., and the broader narrative of American history.