Overview
Title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to ‘‘Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales’’; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1156) to amend the CARES Act to extend the statute of limitations for fraud under certain unemployment programs, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1968) making further continuing appropriations and other extensions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
Congress is talking about three big plans: one about how people tell the government about buying and selling digital money, another about stopping people from tricking the system when they get money if they're not working, and the last about how much money the government will keep spending until 2025. They're only spending a little bit of time talking about each one.
Summary AI
H. Res. 211 sets the rules for the House of Representatives to consider three legislative items. First, it allows the House to debate H.J. Res. 25, which opposes an IRS rule on reporting digital asset sales, without any procedural obstacles and with a one-hour debate. Second, it facilitates the consideration of H.R. 1156, which extends the time limit to prosecute fraud under certain unemployment programs, by automatically adopting a suggested amendment and permitting an hour of discussion. Third, it addresses H.R. 1968, which provides funding and extensions for the fiscal year 2025, also adopting a specified amendment and allowing an hour of debate. Additionally, it specifies that for the rest of the session, certain days will not count towards constraints under the National Emergencies Act regarding ending a national emergency declared earlier in February 2025.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This resolution guides the procedures for discussing and voting on three significant legislative pieces in the U.S. House of Representatives. It encompasses a joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) dealing with the disapproval of an IRS rule concerning the reporting of digital asset sales by brokers, a bill (H.R. 1156) proposing changes to the CARES Act to extend timelines for contesting fraud in unemployment programs, and another bill (H.R. 1968) for fiscal appropriations for the year 2025.
The resolution outlines how each piece of legislation will be debated, including a one-hour debate period and waiver of procedural objections. It also mentions that days in the current congressional session will not count as calendar days in relation to terminating a national emergency declared earlier in the year.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the resolution's procedural stipulations:
Waiving of Procedural Safeguards: The automatic adoption of amendments and the waiver of all points of order against the consideration of these legislative pieces has the potential to bypass critical procedural protections. This could limit transparency and scrutiny, as it might prevent legitimate objections from being raised.
Vague Language: The recurring phrase "and for other purposes" could lead to ambiguity. This lack of clarity may create unintended interpretations or applications, especially in agreements related to appropriations and fraud statutes.
Lack of Details on Amendments: The resolution assumes the adoption of certain committee reports without detailing their contents. This lack of specificity obstructs a clear understanding of potential changes or impacts arising from these amendments.
Limited Debate Time: The provision of only an hour of debate, equally divided, might not suffice to thoroughly discuss and understand the implications of the bills, particularly given their potentially extensive impact.
Calendar Day Designation for National Emergencies: The resolution states that remaining congressional days will not count as calendar days concerning a national emergency but does not clarify how this decision impacts legislative operations or the emergency resolution process.
Details on IRS Rule: There is a lack of clarity regarding the IRS rule concerning digital asset sales. Understanding its implications is crucial for informed debate and decision-making.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The procedural decisions outlined in this resolution may broadly impact the public by potentially reducing transparency and limiting public input in legislative processes. By allowing the waiver of points of order, there is less room for debate and public awareness about what is contained in the legislative measures.
For specific stakeholders, such as brokers dealing with digital assets, a decision on the IRS rule could significantly alter reporting requirements and economic threats. Similarly, those involved in unemployment programs might experience direct effects from changes in fraud claim timelines, potentially affecting both beneficiaries and administrators of these programs.
Government and transparency advocates might view the resolution's procedural waivers as negative, as these could limit accountability and the ability to challenge legislative content. On the other hand, stakeholders favoring swift legislative action might see the efficiency of handling these issues without procedural delays as beneficial.
Overall, while the resolution intends to streamline legislative deliberation and decision-making in certain cases, it could simultaneously limit the public's and specific stakeholders' ability to fully understand or impact these legislative changes.
Issues
The resolution provides for automatic adoption of amendments and waives all points of order against the consideration of the bills and joint resolution (Sections 1, 2, and 3). This could bypass important procedural protections, limiting transparency, public scrutiny, and accountability, as it prevents legitimate objections from being raised.
The use of vague language such as 'and for other purposes' within Sections 2 and 3 could lead to ambiguity and unintended interpretations or applications of the bills. This lack of specificity could result in significant legal and financial implications that are not immediately apparent.
The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules for Section 3 is considered adopted without specifying its contents within the section, leaving unclear what changes or implications might result from it. This affects transparency and makes it difficult for stakeholders to understand the bill fully.
The phrase 'equal division of debate' across Sections 1, 2, and 3, and providing only one hour of debate could be insufficient to thoroughly address all concerns and implications of the bills, especially given their potential impact on significant issues like fraud statutes and appropriations.
The resolution mentions that each day for the remainder of the first session of the 119th Congress shall not constitute a calendar day with respect to a national emergency declared by the President on February 1, 2025, but does not clarify the implications of this decision or elaborate on how this will affect the legislative process (Section 4).
The text does not specify the nature or impact of the IRS rule regarding digital asset sales in Section 1, which could lead to ambiguities about its significance or implications. Understanding the rule's implications is crucial for informed public debate and decision-making.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The resolution allows the House to discuss and vote on a specific joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) about blocking an IRS rule on reporting digital asset sales. It sets the rules for debate: allowing one hour of discussion split between two committee leaders and one chance to send it back for further consideration.
2. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The House of Representatives will discuss a bill to change the CARES Act, aiming to extend the time period during which fraud under certain unemployment programs can be legally challenged. The bill will skip some usual procedures for revisions and opposing motions, allowing for one hour of debate and possibly one final amendment.
3. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The resolution allows the House to consider a bill (H.R. 1968) for funding and other purposes for fiscal year 2025, with all objections waived. It includes a predetermined amendment and sets rules for the debate and vote, allowing for one hour of debate and one opportunity to send the bill back for changes.
4. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 4, it is stated that each remaining day of the first session of the 119th Congress will not be counted as a calendar day when considering the timeline for passing a joint resolution to end a national emergency declared by the President on February 1, 2025, according to the National Emergencies Act.