Overview
Title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 42) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 61) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 11) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources.
ELI5 AI
H. RES. 177 is like setting the stage for a play, where it tells everyone how three big decisions will be talked about in Congress. These decisions are about saving energy in home appliances, keeping the air clean in tire factories, and protecting old things under the sea.
Summary AI
House Resolution 177 sets the rules for the House to consider three joint resolutions that aim to disapprove specific federal regulations. The first resolution, H.J. Res. 42, targets a Department of Energy rule concerning standards for consumer product and commercial equipment energy conservation. The second, H.J. Res. 61, addresses an Environmental Protection Agency rule on hazardous air pollutant standards for rubber tire manufacturing. Lastly, S.J. Res. 11 focuses on a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule concerning the protection of marine archaeological resources. Each resolution can be debated for one hour and can have one motion to recommit.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The resolution at hand, H. RES. 177, is a procedural measure designed to allow the U.S. House of Representatives to consider three joint resolutions. These resolutions seek congressional disapproval of rules established by various federal agencies. Specifically, the resolutions include:
- H.J. Res. 42 - Disapproval of a Department of Energy rule concerning standards and labels for consumer products and commercial equipment.
- H.J. Res. 61 - Opposition to an Environmental Protection Agency rule related to emission standards in rubber tire manufacturing.
- S.J. Res. 11 - Rejection of a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule regarding marine archaeological resources.
Summary of Significant Issues
The resolution raises several notable concerns:
- Waiver of Procedural Safeguards: All points of order against the resolutions are waived, which could bypass essential legislative scrutiny, leading to a lack of transparency.
- Complex Legislative Language: The use of procedural jargon such as "one motion to recommit" and "considered as ordered" may obscure understanding for lawmakers and the public.
- Lack of Specificity: The document fails to detail which specific products or regulations are affected, which could lead to uncertainty and misinterpretation.
- Limited Debate Time: The debate is restricted to one hour, possibly limiting thorough discussion and analysis, thereby impacting informed decision-making.
Potential Impact on the Public
The impact of this resolution on the public largely depends on the outcomes of the joint resolutions it enables for consideration. Each of these resolutions involves rules that could affect energy efficiency, environmental protection, and cultural resource management.
- Public Awareness and Transparency: By waiving procedural safeguards, there might be a reduction in public awareness and understanding of legislative activities.
- Environmental and Energy Standards: Changes or disapproval of rules related to energy conservation and emissions could affect everyday aspects of energy consumption and environmental quality.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Different stakeholders might experience various impacts from the resolutions considered:
- Consumers and Manufacturers: The disapproval of energy standards could affect product labeling, certification, and eventually, consumer choices and manufacturer requirements. These changes could lead to economic advantages or disadvantages depending on the regulation status.
- Environmental Advocates: Key regulations concerning emissions and marine archaeology protection could be weakened, which might lead to increased pollution and a potential threat to environmental and cultural resources.
- Business and Industry: For corporations in rubber tire manufacturing, loosening emission standards may reduce compliance costs but could also result in public backlash or environmental harm.
In conclusion, this resolution presents significant procedural and substantive issues that deserve careful examination. The broader implications on energy standards, environmental protections, and cultural resource management will hinge on the detailed specifics and potential enactment of the underlying joint resolutions.
Issues
The provision to waive all points of order against the consideration of the joint resolutions (H.J. Res. 42, H.J. Res. 61, and S.J. Res. 11) could bypass important procedural safeguards, leading to a lack of scrutiny and potential transparency issues in the legislative process. This is highlighted in Sections 1, 2, and 3.
The use of complex procedural language, such as 'the previous question shall be considered as ordered' and 'one motion to recommit', may obscure the legislative process and make it difficult for the public and lawmakers to fully understand the implications. This is noted in Sections 1, 2, and 3.
The lack of specificity in detailing which consumer products and commercial equipment are affected by the rule from the Department of Energy (H.J. Res. 42) and the rules from the Environmental Protection Agency (H.J. Res. 61) and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (S.J. Res. 11) might lead to ambiguity and uncertainty about which stakeholders could be impacted. This is mentioned in Sections 1, 2, and 3.
The decision to consider the joint resolutions as read, as noted in Sections 1, 2, and 3, could result in lawmakers voting on these resolutions without fully examining or debating their contents, which undermines the legislative process.
The limitation of debate to one hour equally divided, as provided in Sections 1, 2, and 3, may restrict in-depth discussion and thorough consideration of these joint resolutions, potentially impacting informed decision-making.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The resolution allows the House to consider a joint resolution that disapproves of a Department of Energy rule about energy conservation standards. It waives any procedural objections, reads the resolution without amendments, allocates an hour for debate, and permits a single chance to propose changes before the final vote.
2. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the rules for considering a specific joint resolution in the House. This resolution involves reviewing an EPA rule about emission standards in rubber tire manufacturing. It specifies that all objections to the resolution are waived, the resolution is pre-read, allows for an hour of debate, and permits one motion to recommit.
3. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The resolution allows the House to consider a joint resolution aimed at rejecting a rule by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management concerning marine archaeological resources. It waives any objections to the resolution's consideration, mandates one hour of debate split between supporters and opponents, and permits one motion to change the resolution's wording before voting.