Overview

Title

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment.

ELI5 AI

H. RES. 1483 is like setting the rules for a school debate where they talk about making sure boys and girls are treated equally. This time, they decided to keep it simple: everyone talks for a short time, no changes can be made, and they vote at the end.

Summary AI

H. RES. 1483 is a resolution that sets the rules for how the House of Representatives will consider the joint resolution H.J. Res. 25, which aims to remove the deadline for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The resolution allows the joint resolution to be debated for one hour with no amendments permitted and calls for a final vote after debate, with only one motion to recommit allowed. Additionally, all points of order against the consideration and provisions of the joint resolution are waived.

Published

2024-09-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-20
Package ID: BILLS-118hres1483ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
265
Pages:
2
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 81
Verbs: 21
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 14
Entities: 18

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.43
Average Sentence Length:
20.38
Token Entropy:
4.23
Readability (ARI):
13.29

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The resolution, H. RES. 1483, proposes that the House of Representatives immediately consider a joint resolution (H.J. Res. 25) aimed at removing the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). This procedural resolution outlines a streamlined process for its consideration, bypassing typical legislative hurdles and expediting the debate process.

Summary of Significant Issues

Procedural Rigidity

A notable feature of this resolution is its rigid procedural framework. It stipulates that no amendments to the joint resolution are permissible, which might preclude beneficial adjustments or additions from legislators. This restriction can be seen as a way to fast-track the consideration process but may also limit the depth of legislative scrutiny.

Limited Debate and Discussion

The resolution allows for only one hour of debate, shared equally between the chair and the ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules. This limited timeframe might not accommodate exhaustive discussions on such a significant constitutional matter, potentially stifling comprehensive debate and diverse viewpoints.

Waiving of Points of Order

By waiving all points of order against the consideration and provisions of the joint resolution, the resolution minimizes procedural roadblocks. However, this approach also limits opportunities for questioning or challenging aspects of the resolution, potentially reducing the thoroughness of legislative oversight.

Legislative Jargon and Accessibility

The language used in the resolution is highly procedural, potentially making it difficult for individuals without a legal or legislative background to understand the implications or processes involved. This inaccessibility could lead to misunderstandings or a lack of engagement from the general public.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Public Impact

For the general public, the passage of H.J. Res. 25 could signal progress toward enshrining gender equality in the U.S. Constitution through the ERA. By removing the deadline for ratification, this resolution could reactivate efforts across states to support the amendment, potentially leading to significant social and legal advancements.

Impact on Legislators

For legislators, particularly those with a vested interest in gender equality, the accelerated process offers a chance to expedite a long-standing constitutional issue. However, the constrained procedural environment might limit their ability to contribute amendments or extend discussions, potentially curtailing their legislative influence.

Advocacy Groups

Advocacy groups focused on civil rights and gender equality may view the resolution as a positive step, as it attempts to remove procedural barriers that have historically stalled the ERA’s progress. Conversely, groups opposed to the ERA might argue that the resolution bypasses essential checks and balances, reducing their ability to present counterarguments.

Conclusion

H. RES. 1483 aims to facilitate the removal of the ERA's ratification deadline through an expedited legislative process. While its efficient approach might advance constitutional gender equality, the tight restrictions on debate and amendments raise concerns about the depth of democratic engagement and scrutiny. The impact of this resolution will largely depend on the subsequent actions of state legislatures and the public’s response to these congressional efforts.

Issues

  • The resolution waives all points of order against consideration and provisions of the joint resolution, which might limit the opportunity for thorough legislative scrutiny. This issue is reflected in Section 1.

  • No amendments to the joint resolution are allowed, which could preclude constructive changes or inputs. This limitation is discussed in Section 1.

  • The procedure outlined is very rigid, allowing for minimal debate which may not accommodate comprehensive discussions or dissenting views. This is found in Section 1.

  • The language in the resolution is highly procedural and may be difficult for individuals without a legal or legislative background to understand. This issue is pertinent across the resolution, particularly in Section 1.

  • Clause 1(c) of rule XIX is bypassed without providing context or explanation, which could be confusing for readers unfamiliar with legislative procedures. This unclear reference is detailed in Section 2.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The House of Representatives plans to immediately consider a joint resolution to remove the deadline for the Equal Rights Amendment ratification. The process includes strict rules: no changes to the resolution are allowed, one hour is allocated for debate, and one chance to recommit is offered, bypassing any procedural obstacles.

2. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that Clause 1(c) of Rule XIX does not apply to the discussion of House Joint Resolution 25.