Overview

Title

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2708) to prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities who need long-term services and supports, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure that people with disabilities who need help for a long time are treated fairly and not left out. It talks about the rules for discussing this bill in a big meeting, but some parts might be tricky to understand without knowing how the government meetings work.

Summary AI

The resolution, H. RES. 1452, is a procedural measure that outlines how the House of Representatives will consider the bill H.R. 2708. This bill aims to prevent discrimination against people with disabilities who need long-term services and supports. The resolution waives all points of order against the bill's consideration and states that the bill will be read in full. It includes provisions for one hour of debate and a motion to recommit, disregarding rule XIX clause 1(c) for this bill's consideration.

Published

2024-09-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-09-17
Package ID: BILLS-118hres1452ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
273
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 84
Verbs: 23
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 13
Entities: 17

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.50
Average Sentence Length:
30.33
Token Entropy:
4.44
Readability (ARI):
18.56

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H. RES. 1452 is a resolution brought before the House of Representatives to set the terms for discussing a bill identified as H.R. 2708. The primary objective of H.R. 2708 is to prevent discrimination against individuals with disabilities who require long-term services and supports. This resolution not only organizes the consideration of the bill but also establishes the procedures that will be followed during the discussion, including specifying the duration of the debate and the possibility of proposing amendments.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns with H. RES. 1452 is its lack of detail about the actual contents of the bill H.R. 2708. Without specific information about what the bill entails, it becomes challenging to assess if it might involve any unnecessary spending or favoritism. Additionally, the resolution waives all points of order against its consideration and provisions, which can potentially bypass vital procedural safeguards meant to ensure comprehensive review and debate.

Furthermore, the procedural terms used, such as "the previous question shall be considered as ordered" and references to a "motion to recommit," are not explained, which might confuse individuals not familiar with legislative processes. The exemption of H.R. 2708 from Clause 1(c) of rule XIX without context further adds to concerns about transparency and clarity.

Impact on the Public

The bill seeks to promote fairness and equality for individuals with disabilities by prohibiting discrimination in long-term care services. Potentially, this could have a positive impact on those requiring such services by ensuring they are treated equally and have access to essential support. A broad implication might be a more inclusive societal approach to supporting individuals with disabilities, aligning with broader goals of equality and fairness.

The waiver of procedural safeguards, while intended to expedite the legislative process, might raise public concerns about the thoroughness of legislative scrutiny. A lack of understanding and engagement in the legislative process could foster distrust among the public if they perceive that bills are being pushed through without adequate debate.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For individuals with disabilities, H.R. 2708 holds the promise of improved access to necessary services without facing discrimination. This ensures their rights are protected, potentially improving their quality of life significantly. Care providers and organizations may also be impacted, as they would need to ensure compliance with new non-discrimination standards, which could require changes in policy and practice.

Legislators and policymakers are stakeholders as well, as the resolution impacts how they engage with the legislative process. By setting aside certain procedural norms, they might encounter both convenience in passing beneficial legislation and critique for possibly undermining transparency and critical review.

In summary, while the bill aims at a noble pursuit of equality and support for individuals with disabilities, the approach taken by H. RES. 1452 in facilitating its consideration raises several concerns about procedural transparency and public understanding. Balancing efficiency with thoroughness remains crucial in legislative processes to maintain public trust and ensure fair outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The bill (H.R. 2708), which is focused on prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities who need long-term services and supports, lacks detailed content in H. RES. 1452, making it difficult to assess the specifics of the legislation, such as potential wasteful spending or favoritism, reducing transparency (Section 1).

  • H. RES. 1452 waives all points of order against the consideration and provisions of the bill, potentially bypassing important procedural safeguards that ensure thorough review and debate, raising concerns about the legislative process being compromised (Section 1).

  • The resolution specifies that 'the previous question shall be considered as ordered,' a legislative procedure that may not be clear to the general public. This could obscure the legislative process and decrease public understanding and engagement (Section 1).

  • The reference to the 'motion to recommit' without explanation may confuse those unfamiliar with legislative procedures, potentially disengaging the public from participating in the legislative process (Section 1).

  • The exemption of H.R. 2708 from Clause 1(c) of rule XIX is mentioned without sufficient context or reasoning, leading to possible concerns about transparency and the necessity of bypassing standard rules (Section 2).

  • There is an assumption that readers are familiar with congressional rules, such as Clause 1(c) of rule XIX, which might not be the case, making it challenging for the general public to fully understand the implications of the resolution (Section 2).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the House of Representatives will begin discussing a bill aimed at stopping discrimination against people with disabilities who require long-term care. It also outlines that there will be one hour of debate, followed by a chance to propose changes, before the final vote is taken without any interruptions.

2. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Clause 1(c) of rule XIX is set aside for the discussion of the proposed law H.R. 2708, meaning it does not apply to how the bill is considered.