Overview

Title

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8774) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8771) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8752) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

House Resolution 1316 is like a set of rules for how grown-ups in Congress talk about and change some big spending plans for the army, helping other countries, and keeping everyone safe at home. It also says that one of these plans can't move to the next step until another important rule becomes official.

Summary AI

House Resolution 1316 facilitates the consideration of three appropriation bills for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025. The bills covered are H.R. 8774 for the Department of Defense, H.R. 8771 for the Department of State and foreign operations, and H.R. 8752 for the Department of Homeland Security. The resolution sets rules for debating, amending, and voting on these bills, including specifics on how amendments can be presented and discussed. Additionally, it mandates that H.R. 8752 cannot be sent to the Senate until H.R. 2 from May 2023 becomes law.

Published

2024-06-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-06-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hres1316eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
18
Words:
2,403
Pages:
10
Sentences:
71

Language

Nouns: 646
Verbs: 205
Adjectives: 110
Adverbs: 21
Numbers: 98
Entities: 154

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.34
Average Sentence Length:
33.85
Token Entropy:
4.72
Readability (ARI):
20.03

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The resolution outlines how the House of Representatives will consider three bills related to appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025. These bills are crucial for funding the Department of Defense, the Department of State and foreign operations, and the Department of Homeland Security. The resolution establishes procedures for debating and amending the bills, including waiving certain procedural objections, setting debate times, and allowing specific amendments to be considered.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill's provisions raise several issues, primarily concerning transparency and procedural fairness. By waiving all points of order against the consideration of the bills, it might bypass essential procedural safeguards, potentially limiting scrutiny. The practice of allowing amendments en bloc—multiple amendments proposed and voted on as one—also poses challenges by reducing the opportunity for detailed examination of each amendment. Furthermore, the legislative language throughout is complex, creating difficulties for those not well-versed in parliamentary procedures to engage with and understand the process. Additionally, the bill links the transmission of one of the appropriations bills (H.R. 8752) to the Senate with the enactment of an entirely different bill (H.R. 2), which might lead to legislative gridlock.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, how the public might be affected by this resolution largely depends on the outcomes of the appropriations it facilitates. Proper funding for defense, state, and homeland security operations is vital for national security and the execution of foreign policy. However, the procedural shortcuts and complexities in the legislation process could reduce public trust and understanding of congressional proceedings. Without clear, accessible processes, public engagement and oversight are diminished, which could have long-term implications for democratic accountability.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Government Agencies: The Department of Defense, the State Department, and Homeland Security are directly impacted by these appropriations. The resolution's swift procedural approach could ensure timely receipt of necessary funds, empowering these agencies to plan and execute their operations effectively for the upcoming fiscal year.

Members of Congress: For legislators, particularly those not in leading committee roles, the outlined procedures might limit their ability to scrutinize and influence the legislation thoroughly. This could lead to frustrations among those who feel sidelined by en bloc amendments and reduced debating time.

General Public and Advocacy Groups: Those advocating for transparency and public engagement in legislative processes might view the resolution's procedural waivers and rapid handling of amendments with concern. It limits the capacity for constituents and interest groups to hold their representatives accountable for specific legislative decisions, particularly in areas of spending that have far-reaching implications.

In summary, while the resolution aims to efficiently facilitate crucial government funding, its approach raises questions about transparency, democratic engagement, and potential legislative gridlock. These issues merit careful consideration to ensure that the workings of Congress remain open and comprehensible to those it represents.

Issues

  • The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill, as noted in Sections 1, 6, and 11, could bypass important procedural safeguards, reducing transparency and scrutiny of legislative processes.

  • The allowance for en bloc amendments, mentioned in Sections 3, 8, and 13, can reduce transparency by preventing detailed scrutiny of individual amendments, potentially leading to the inclusion of unrelated or controversial changes without adequate review.

  • The complex legislative language throughout the bill, particularly in Sections 2, 3, 11, and 17, may be difficult for the general public to understand, limiting transparency and public engagement with the legislative process.

  • The dependency of transmitting H.R. 8752 to the Senate on the enactment of H.R. 2, discussed in Section 16, could lead to legislative gridlock if H.R. 2 faces obstacles, impacting the efficiency of passing crucial appropriations legislation.

  • The provision allowing 'pro forma amendments' in Sections 4, 9, and 14 without clear definition might lead to unnecessary prolonging of discussions or ambiguity in legislative proceedings.

  • The lack of specificity regarding the contents of amendments considered as adopted, such as in Sections 1, 11, and 17, may lead to ambiguity in the changes being made to the bills, reducing accountability and clarity in legislative intentions.

  • The potential for excessive debate due to the allowance of up to 10 pro forma amendments, as noted in Sections 4, 9, and 14, raises concerns about the potential for unnecessary prolonging of discussions without clear objectives.

  • The phrase 'without intervening motion except one motion to recommit,' particularly found in Sections 5, 10, and 15, might be seen as overly complex, further complicating the clarity and comprehension of the legislative process for those unfamiliar with parliamentary procedures.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Speaker of the House has the authority to start discussions in a special committee about a bill for funding the Department of Defense for 2025. This bill will skip the initial reading, and all objections to it will be ignored, allowing for one hour of general discussion, with further changes being made under a specific rule that limits discussion on amendments.

2. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill sets rules for amendments to a specific piece of legislation, H.R. 8774. It states that no additional amendments can be made except for those listed in a particular report, and it outlines how these amendments will be considered and debated, including restrictions on further changes and demands. Additionally, it waives certain procedural objections against these amendments.

3. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that the chair of the Committee on Appropriations, or someone they choose, can propose multiple amendments at once, as long as these are part of a specific report and haven't been addressed yet. These grouped amendments will be discussed for 20 minutes, with time evenly split between two main committee members or their representatives, and they can't be changed or divided further during the process.

4. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

During the amendment process for the bill H.R. 8774, the leaders of the Committee on Appropriations, or people they choose, are allowed to propose up to 10 non-binding amendments each to encourage discussion.

5. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that after discussing and possibly amending the bill H.R. 8774, the Committee will present the updated version to the House. Any additional changes or questions about the bill will be settled before its final approval, except for one chance to send it back for reconsideration.

6. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The resolution allows the Speaker of the House to begin reviewing a bill about funding the Department of State and related areas. The initial reading of the bill is skipped, debate is limited to an hour, some technical points of order are waived, and a specific amendment is automatically adopted for further discussion.

7. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Under Section 7, any further amendments to H.R. 8771 can only be made if they are listed in part B of a specific report, described in a particular section, or are certain allowed types, and these amendments must follow specific rules about who can propose them, how they are debated, and how they are read. Additionally, all objections against these amendments are set aside as described in the resolution.

8. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the chair of the Committee on Appropriations to propose groups of amendments together. These amendments can be debated for 20 minutes, with the time divided equally between members, and they cannot be altered further or divided into separate votes, unless another section of the resolution allows it.

9. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

During the discussion of H.R. 8771, the leaders from both parties on the Appropriations Committee, or people they choose, can each suggest up to 10 changes just for the sake of debate.

10. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes the process after discussing amendments to a bill named H.R. 8771. It states that the committee will submit the amended bill to the House and that there will be a vote without any additional debates, except one chance to suggest changes before final approval.

11. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Speaker can move the House into a Committee to discuss and amend a bill regarding funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025. General discussion on the bill is limited to one hour, and certain procedural rules and points of order are waived to allow for amendments and quicker consideration.

12. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no further amendments to the bill H.R. 8752 can be considered unless they are listed in a specific part of a committee report, grouped together, or are simple formal revisions. These amendments must be presented in a specific order, only by designated members, and are not open to further changes or extensive debate. Any objections to these amendments are also waived.

13. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the chair of the Committee on Appropriations to propose multiple amendments together from a specific report. These amendments can be debated for 20 minutes in total, shared equally between the chair and the ranking minority member, and cannot be changed or split into separate questions.

14. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

During the discussion of the bill H.R. 8752, the chair and the top-ranking minority member of the Appropriations Committee, or someone they choose, can each propose up to 10 minor changes to the bill at any time, mainly to facilitate discussion.

15. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The committee will report the bill H.R. 8752, along with any changes made, to the House after finishing the amendment process. The bill will then proceed towards a final vote without further delays, except for one opportunity to send the bill back to the committee for additional changes.

16. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Clerk of the House cannot send a message to the Senate about the passing of bill H.R. 8752 until they receive confirmation from the Speaker that bill H.R. 2, which the House passed on May 11, 2023, has become law.

17. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to increase the number of H-2B visas issued beyond the usual limit for the fiscal year 2025 if American businesses cannot find enough U.S. workers to fill their temporary non-agricultural jobs. This increase is capped at the highest number of visas given during any previous year when returning workers were not counted against the limit.

18. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

During the discussion of bill H.R. 8771, this section states that amendment number 37, as mentioned in part B of House Report 118–559, cannot be considered.