Overview

Title

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6192) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7109) to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 109) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2925) to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to provide for security of tenure for use of mining claims for ancillary activities, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. RES. 1194 is a plan for discussing different ideas in the House of Representatives, like how we save energy, who answers questions in the national survey, how we count people for deciding how many Representatives each state gets, and rules about using land for mining. The plan says how long people can talk about these ideas and what changes they can ask for.

Summary AI

H. RES. 1194 sets the rules for considering several bills and a joint resolution in the House of Representatives. The resolution allows for the discussion and amendment of bills related to energy conservation standards (H.R. 6192), census citizenship questions (H.R. 7109), congressional disapproval of an SEC rule (H.J. Res. 109), and mining claims tenure (H.R. 2925). It specifies how debate and amendments should be handled, waives points of order against the bills, and permits a motion to recommit under specific conditions.

Published

2024-05-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-05-07
Package ID: BILLS-118hres1194eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,015
Pages:
5
Sentences:
35

Language

Nouns: 272
Verbs: 104
Adjectives: 46
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 32
Entities: 52

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.41
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
4.65
Readability (ARI):
17.95

AnalysisAI

The resolution detailed in this document outlines the procedures for considering four different legislative proposals in the United States House of Representatives. These proposals include changes to energy conservation standards, the inclusion of a citizenship question in the census, a disapproval resolution regarding a Securities and Exchange Commission rule, and amendments related to mining claims.

General Summary

The resolution begins with H.R. 6192, a bill aimed at adjusting the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to ensure that any new energy standards set by the Secretary of Energy are both technologically achievable and economically viable. This bill seeks to modify existing regulatory frameworks concerning energy conservation standards.

H.R. 7109 proposes the inclusion of a citizenship question in the decennial census and aims to change the way Representatives are apportioned in Congress, shifting the basis from the total population to the count of citizens only. This proposal carries significant implications for political representation in the United States.

H.J. Res. 109 is a joint resolution that seeks congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." The resolution seeks to invalidate a regulation, though specifics of the bulletin are not provided.

Lastly, H.R. 2925 aims to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 concerning mining operations, specifically focusing on the security of tenure for mining claims for ancillary activities.

Significant Issues

A primary concern with the resolution is the proposed change in the basis for apportioning Congressional Representatives, as outlined in H.R. 7109. By apportioning representatives based on citizen count rather than total population, this bill could fundamentally alter political representation and resource distribution in ways that may face strong legal and political challenges.

The inclusion of a citizenship question in the census may discourage participation among certain populations, affecting the accuracy and completeness of census data. This could have downstream effects on both political representation and federal resource allocation.

Procedural concerns arise due to the waiver of all points of order in considering these bills, which may limit the ability to challenge or modify potentially problematic provisions, thereby affecting legislative transparency and accountability.

In H.R. 2925, the broad term "other purposes" could allow for unintended applications of the mining legislation, which requires scrutiny to ensure appropriate use and management.

Potential Impacts on the Public

The proposed changes to the census and Congressional apportionment could impact how districts are drawn and how funds are allocated to various regions of the country. If certain populations are underrepresented, their communities might receive less political attention and fewer federal resources.

For energy consumers and producers, the changes in H.R. 6192 could influence how energy conservation standards are implemented, potentially affecting energy costs, innovation, and environmental outcomes.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

The legislation that shifts apportionment based on citizenship could advantage or disadvantage political parties depending on demographic shifts and urban versus rural residency patterns, potentially leading to extensive legal disputes and further polarization.

Energy industry stakeholders could see regulatory changes that either benefit or hinder innovation and costs, depending on how new technological and economic standards are evaluated and enforced.

The mining industry might benefit from clearer and more secured use rights under H.R. 2925, which could encourage investment and operational security, though it requires diligent oversight to prevent natural resource exploitation that conflicts with environmental or public interests.

In summary, these legislative proposals present complex changes with broad implications, requiring careful consideration of both immediate and long-term impacts on American society and various specific stakeholder groups.

Issues

  • The proposal to modify the apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons (Section 2) could lead to significant political and legal challenges regarding representation. This fundamental change has far-reaching implications for political power distribution.

  • Including a citizenship question on the decennial census (Section 2) may decrease participation by certain populations, potentially impacting the accuracy of the census. This could have long-term effects on resource allocation and political representation.

  • The waiver of all points of order against the consideration of various bills (Sections 1, 2, 3, 4) might limit the ability to address procedural concerns and challenge potentially problematic provisions, impacting legislative transparency and accountability.

  • The amendment process is highly restricted (Section 1), with only pre-designated amendments to be considered, limiting democratic participation and flexibility to respond to unforeseen issues during the legislative process.

  • The broad and vague language, such as 'other purposes' in the mining claims bill (Section 4), could potentially allow for unintended uses or interpretations, affecting resource management and regulatory practices.

  • The legalistic and complex language used throughout the text (Sections 1, 2, 3, 4) may be difficult for the general public to understand without legal expertise, affecting public engagement and transparency.

  • There is insufficient context provided for 'Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121' (Section 3), which could hinder understanding of its implications and the rationale for congressional disapproval.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Speaker can call the House into the Committee of the Whole to discuss a bill prohibiting the Secretary of Energy from setting unrealistic energy standards. The bill will have one hour of debate, can be amended as specified, and cannot be amended any further except as allowed by the Committee on Rules, with an organized process for debate and amendments.

2. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The House is considering a bill, H.R. 7109, which would add a citizenship question to the census and change how representatives are assigned based on citizenship rather than total population. The bill has been amended by a committee, and the House will have one hour for debate, with no further amendments allowed except for one potential motion to reconsider.

3. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The resolution allows the House to consider a joint resolution that disapproves of a Securities and Exchange Commission rule about "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." All objections to the resolution or its provisions are dismissed, and the resolution will proceed with limited debate and only one chance to propose changes before a final vote.

4. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Upon adopting this resolution, the House will consider a bill to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 concerning mining claims with certain rules in place, such as waiving points of order and allowing specific times for debate and a potential amendment.