Overview
Title
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to deny certain privileges of the House of Representatives to former Members who have been expelled from the House, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The resolution wants to change the rules so that if a person is kicked out of the House of Representatives for doing something wrong, they can't come back to visit or use special places like the gym and library. It's like saying if someone broke the rules, they can't come back and play with their old toys.
Summary AI
The resolution titled “Upholding the Integrity of Our Institution Resolution” aims to change the rules of the House of Representatives to restrict privileges of former Members who have been expelled. It proposes that such individuals should be denied entry to the Hall of the House and have their access to various benefits and services revoked. These benefits include entry to the floor of the House, athletic and dining facilities, parking spaces, materials from the House document room, and others. The resolution was introduced by Mr. D'Esposito along with Mr. LaLota and Mr. Lawler and was referred to the Committee on Rules on April 12, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The resolution titled "Upholding the Integrity of Our Institution Resolution" proposes changes to the rules of the United States House of Representatives. The primary objective of this resolution is to withhold certain privileges from former Members of the House who have been expelled due to misconduct. By amending existing House rules, the resolution aims to reinforce standards of integrity and accountability within the House.
General Summary of the Bill
The resolution outlines two main provisions. Firstly, it seeks to prevent former Members who have been expelled from entering the Hall of the House. Secondly, it proposes denying such individuals various benefits and services previously available to them. This includes access to the House floor, athletic and dining facilities, parking spaces, the House document room, and certain research resources from the Congressional Research Service and the Library of Congress.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue highlighted by the resolution is the balance between maintaining integrity within the House and the potential for redemption for those expelled. Section 2's denial of Hall access raises questions about fairness and whether individuals should be perpetually penalized after serving their disciplinary term. Furthermore, Section 3's extensive prohibition of benefits and services to expelled Members challenges long-standing norms regarding their continued involvement in legislative matters. This includes denying access to research materials and communication tools, which may be seen as punitive.
Impact on the Public
The proposed resolution could affect the public's perception of accountability within the House of Representatives. By enforcing stricter consequences for misconduct, the legislation may enhance public trust in the institution's integrity. People might view the resolution as a necessary measure to ensure that only those who uphold the highest standards of conduct represent them.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For former Members who have been expelled, the resolution has both practical and symbolic ramifications. Denying access to services like the Congressional Research Service may hinder their ability to stay informed and involved in public discourse. This, in turn, could affect their potential for professional engagement and rehabilitation post-expulsion.
On the other hand, current members of the House might see this resolution as a reinforcement of ethical standards, potentially decreasing the likelihood of future misconduct. It sets a precedent that consequences remain even after leaving office, which might deter similar behavior within the institution.
Conclusion
In summary, while the "Upholding the Integrity of Our Institution Resolution" strives to maintain high standards of conduct by withholding privileges from expelled Members, it ignites debates about justice, fairness, and redemption. The resolution could bolster the public's trust in legislative bodies, yet poses questions about the intensity and scope of punitive measures for misconduct.
Issues
The denial of access to the Hall of the House to former Members who have been expelled might be seen as a significant step in maintaining the integrity and disciplinary standards within the House, but also raises questions about fairness and redemption for those who have been punished for their previous actions. (Section 2)
The amendment to Rule XXIX which denies various benefits and services to expelled Members, including access to the House floor, athletic facilities, dining room, and materials, may impact previously accepted norms regarding the status of former Members, potentially leading to various legal and ethical debates about the treatment of expelled Members. (Section 3)
The provision denying expelled Members access to the Congressional Research Service and the Library of Congress could impact the ability of these individuals to stay informed and engaged with legislative matters, potentially seen as punitive beyond the scope of expulsion. (Section 3)
Removing short-term franking privileges from expelled Members may complicate their communication efforts with constituents and other stakeholders, highlighting ongoing questions about the fairness of restricting communication channels post-expulsion. (Section 3)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this resolution provides its short title, which is the “Upholding the Integrity of Our Institution Resolution.”
2. Denying admission to Hall of the House to former Members who have been expelled Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the House of Representatives rules would prevent former Members who have been expelled from entering the Hall of the House.
3. Benefits and services provided to certain former Members of the House of Representatives Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In a new rule, the House of Representatives states that if a former Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner is expelled, they lose access to various benefits and services, such as House floor access, athletic and dining facilities, parking spaces, and research resources, among others.