Overview
Title
Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Federal job guarantee.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about making sure everyone who wants a job can get one by having the government provide jobs at a good pay rate, around $25 an hour, and with nice benefits like vacation time. This idea aims to help people earn money fairly and make sure no one is out of work, but it doesn’t say exactly how the money for these jobs will be organized or if it will work perfectly.
Summary AI
H. RES. 1011 recognizes the responsibility of the U.S. Federal Government to create a Federal job guarantee, ensuring that every individual who wants to work can find a job. The resolution emphasizes that a job guarantee would eliminate unemployment, promote economic equality by closing racial and gender income gaps, and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable society. It outlines goals such as providing a living wage, fair working conditions, and opportunities for career advancement. The proposed initiative would be administered by the Department of Labor, supported by funding from the Treasury, and involve local and state governments, unions, and communities in its planning and implementation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The resolution, H. RES. 1011, proposes that the United States federal government establish a Federal job guarantee. This initiative aims to ensure that all individuals who want to work have the opportunity to do so, thereby eliminating involuntary unemployment. The resolution draws inspiration from historical precedents and highlights the importance of a fair, living wage, along with benefits such as health insurance and retirement plans. It also emphasizes the need for equitable opportunities and the recognition of various types of socially necessary work, including care work and environmental conservation. The resolution suggests that the Department of Labor should be primarily responsible for overseeing this program with input from local and state governments.
Significant Issues
Several critical issues arise from this proposal.
Scope and Financial Implications: The bill's broad scope, including a wide array of projects, raises concerns about potential wasteful spending. The proposal for a minimum wage of $25 per hour could result in substantial financial commitments without clear funding strategies or limitations.
Ambiguity and Complexity: Terms like "socially necessary or useful work" and "appropriate public investment" are vague, which may lead to inconsistent interpretations and ineffective allocation of resources. Additionally, the proposal's language around transparent consultation processes seems overly complex, creating challenges in actual implementation.
Overlapping Responsibilities: There is a potential for redundancy, as the roles of various agencies, including the Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Treasury, are not clearly defined. This overlap may lead to administrative complications.
Lack of Measurable Outcomes: The resolution does not provide specific benchmarks or measurable outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed programs, making it difficult to assess their success or make necessary adjustments over time.
Potential Impact on the Public
The broader public could benefit from increased job opportunities and the economic security that accompanies a guaranteed living wage and job benefits. This proposal, if successful, could reduce unemployment rates and improve the standard of living for many individuals, especially those in economically vulnerable positions.
However, the potential financial strain on government resources might impact taxpayers if the initiative requires significant federal investment without a clear funding source. Additionally, ambiguity in program definitions and execution could lead to inefficiencies and uneven implementation across different regions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
Workers and Job Seekers: The program promises fair compensation and benefits, likely benefiting underemployed or unemployed individuals. This is particularly advantageous to marginalized groups who face discrimination in the workforce.
Frontline and Vulnerable Communities: By focusing on racial equity and environmental sustainability, the program could support communities traditionally marginalized in economic discussions.
Negative Impacts
Existing Employment Programs: Current state and federal employment programs may face redundancy issues, potentially resulting in inefficiency and resource wastage.
Businesses: Companies relying on lower-wage labor might experience challenges sourcing workers who opt for guaranteed jobs with higher pay, influencing wage structures and operational costs.
Overall, the success of the Federal job guarantee will hinge on precise implementation, clear guidelines, and balanced financial management to ensure it fulfills its intended objectives without unintended adverse consequences.
Financial Assessment
The resolution, H. RES. 1011, primarily highlights the U.S. Federal Government's obligation to create a Federal job guarantee that aims to eliminate unemployment and promote social and economic equity. This commentary will focus on the financial aspects of the proposal and their implications.
Financial Summary
The resolution does not specify appropriations or direct spending but outlines a comprehensive Federal job guarantee program with significant implications for funding and financial commitments. It suggests setting a minimum wage of $25 per hour, which would be a key cost driver. Additionally, jobs under this program would include benefits consistent with those provided to existing Federal Government employees, such as health insurance, paid sick leave, family leave, retirement benefits, and paid vacation.
The implementation would require "adequate and appropriate" funding using the "Congress power of the purse." These allocations would seemingly hinge on Federal support funneling to local and State governments and various direct Federal grant and investment programs. However, specifics on budget allocations or sourcing of funds are not detailed, indicating an openness to substantial financial commitments.
Financial Implications and Issues
Scope and Prioritization: The breadth of the job guarantee initiative could lead to potentially wasteful spending. Projects could range widely, influencing how funds are allocated. Without clear prioritization or limits, spending may not efficiently address key areas of need (relates to Issue 1).
Minimum Wage Commitment: The proposal for a minimum hourly wage of no less than $25 raises concerns regarding unchecked financial commitments. This amount surpasses current federal minimum wage standards, which could strain Federal resources and require significant budget considerations (relates to Issue 2).
Vague Investment Guidelines: Reference to "appropriate public investment" lacks specificity, raising concerns over possible misuse or ineffective spending. Clear guidelines on fund allocation and monitoring for effectiveness are absent, which may lead to financial inefficiencies (relates to Issue 3).
Implementation Costs: The resolution highlights various areas of employment yet underlines the need for administrative alignment among the Department of Labor, Treasury, and local bodies. This multi-level collaboration could involve complex financial logistics and high administrative costs, which are not clearly accounted for (relates to Issues 6 and 8).
Undefined Financial Strategy for 'Workers’ Bill of Rights': Establishing and enforcing a "Workers’ Bill of Rights" is mentioned but lacks financial detail. The practical impact of this initiative would heavily depend on financial resources, enforcement mechanisms, and their corresponding costs, which are not specified (relates to Issue 5).
Lack of Specific Measurable Outcomes: The absence of clear benchmarks or measurable outcomes in the resolution may result in difficulties assessing the success of financial expenditures. This could lead to inefficiency and challenges in ensuring funds are utilized effectively (relates to general observation).
In summary, while the resolution lays out ambitious goals to address unemployment and ensure economic equity, the lack of explicit financial allocations or strategic steps for managing and monitoring expenses weakens its feasibility. The absence of detailed funding strategies and financial constraints introduces significant risk in terms of potential inefficiencies and overspending.
Issues
The scope of the job guarantee is extremely broad, which may lead to wasteful spending without clear prioritization or limits, as seen in various parts of the bill including provisions for a wide range of projects and guaranteed pay (Sections (1), (2), and (3)).
The lack of a funding strategy or clear financial limits could lead to unchecked financial commitments, particularly with proposals for a minimum pay rate 'no less than $25 per hour' (Section (5)).
The term 'appropriate public investment' is vague, lacking specific guidelines on how funds will be allocated or monitored for effectiveness, raising concerns over potential misuse or ineffective spending (Section (1)(I)).
The phrase 'socially necessary or useful work' is ambiguous and could lead to varying interpretations of what qualifies as eligible work, risking inconsistency and inefficiency (Section (1)(F)).
The enactment of a 'Workers’ Bill of Rights' without specific details on enforceability creates uncertainty about its practical impact and effectiveness (Section (2)(B)).
Potential duplication of existing state and federal employment programs could lead to redundancy and inefficiencies, as roles for different government levels and agencies overlap (Section (9)).
The language around 'transparent and inclusive consultation' might be overly complex, necessitating further clarification on how this will be practically implemented with numerous communities and stakeholders (Section (2)(D)).
The roles of the Department of Labor and Secretary of the Treasury in program administration are not entirely clear, which could lead to administrative complications and inefficiencies (Section (9)).
The bill lacks clear benchmarks or measurable outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of the programs, leading to potential inefficiency and difficulty in assessing program success (general observation).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
(1) Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The House of Representatives believes it's important for the federal government to ensure everyone in the U.S. who wants a job can have one through a Federal job guarantee. This would include creating new jobs that pay fairly and offer benefits, protecting workers' rights, and focusing on social and environmental fairness, with projects managed by the Department of Labor and local governments.
Money References
- That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that— (1) it is the duty of the Federal Government to create a Federal job guarantee— (A) to finally eliminate the moral and economic scourge of involuntary unemployment; (B) to establish a true full employment society, in which anyone who wants to undertake paid work in the service of the community and the environment has ample opportunities to do so; (C) to collectively achieve the greatest possible level of socially and ecologically sustainable prosperity, and share the fruits of that prosperity equitably among all people; (D) to empower the working class by offering every worker, regardless of his or her background, capacity, or status, the opportunity to earn a fair, living wage, and to organize with fellow workers to advocate for common interests; (E) to ensure every person in the United States has genuine and meaningful opportunities for education, training, career advancement, and choice with respect to workforce participation; (F) to update and expand our understanding of socially necessary or useful work to include historically underrecognized and uncompensated labor, including domestic and social care, ecological preservation, and cultural, scientific, and creative work; (G) to promote justice and equity by stopping current, preventing future, and repairing historic oppression and discrimination of indigenous peoples, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth (referred to in this resolution as “frontline and vulnerable communities”); (H) to complete the unfinished legacy of the civil rights movement and the New Deal, and meet the contemporary challenges posed by the climate crisis identified in the Green New Deal resolution; and (I) to meet the broader social and economic challenges of the 21st century through appropriate public investment, socially coordinated planning, and industrial cooperation; (2) the goals described in subparagraphs (A) through (I) of paragraph (1) (the “job guarantee goals”) should be accomplished through an immediate national mobilization— (A) to establish and honor a legally enforceable right to fair, dignified, and decently remunerated employment for all eligible individuals living in the United States (hereafter the “right to employment”); (B) to establish and honor a bill of workers’ rights, as a complement to the right to employment, that addresses issues related to worker exploitation, discrimination, harassment, compensation, privacy, autonomy, choice of employment, working conditions, the right to organize and collectively bargain, suitable accommodation for people with disabilities, protection and expansion of existing safety net programs, and other related concerns (hereafter the “Workers’ Bill of Rights”); (C) to establish, implement, and administer a comprehensive and diverse range of socially necessary and useful public projects, reflective of community and regional needs, including direct public job creation programs, and to support related education, training, credentialing, and career development programs, to ensure workers enjoy meaningful choice and appropriate opportunities for growth and advancement in their chosen area of employment (hereafter the “enabling programs”); (D) to design and implement the right to employment, Workers’ Bill of Rights, and enabling programs through transparent and inclusive consultation, collaboration, and partnership with frontline and vulnerable communities, labor unions, worker cooperatives, civil society groups, State and local governments, academia, and businesses; (E) to take ecological and equitable concerns into consideration when designing and implementing the right to employment, Workers’ Bill of Rights, and enabling programs, as well as any other related infrastructural and administrative institutions and procedures; (F) to take any and all necessary steps to ensure, wherever possible, that all people benefit from the collective prosperity resulting from the establishment of the right to employment, Workers’ Bill of Rights, and enabling programs; and (G) to adequately and appropriately fund these efforts on a permanent, nondiscretionary basis, using Congress power of the purse, through a combination of Federal support to local and State governments, and various direct Federal grant and investment programs; (3) the national mobilization toward a Federal job guarantee would include projects that— (A) strengthen communities, retool our economy, achieve inclusive prosperity, and leave no one behind; (B) address national priorities as well as those put forward by local governments and community organizations, with the participation of communities impacted by structural racism, oppression, and disinvestment in the selection of projects; (C) create net new jobs, without displacing existing public sector workers; and (D) prioritize racial equity and environmental sustainability, including but not limited to ensuring a just transition for workers and frontline communities currently involved in unsustainable industries; (4) job guarantee workers would be employed in a range of ways, including but not limited to— (A) ensuring the delivery of high-quality, professional care to children, seniors, and others in need of long-term support in family based, informal, and formal settings; (B) augmenting the staffing of public education and early childhood learning, including Head Start and preschool; (C) strengthening public afterschool programs, libraries, and recreational programs to provide lifelong learning and enrichment for people of all ages; (D) implementing community infrastructure and improvement projects that revitalize neighborhoods, including vacant and abandoned property cleanup, street and sidewalk repair, remodeling and modernization of schools and other public community-serving facilities, and maintenance and renovation of parks, playgrounds, and public spaces; (E) expanding emergency preparedness, and relief and recovery from natural and community disasters, including public health, natural disasters, and environmental emergencies; (F) producing works of public art and documentation of United States history akin to the Works Project Administration’s Federal Art Project; (G) implementing environmental conservation, remediation, and sustainability initiatives, increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and our housing stock to address climate change, and building climate resistance through programs such as the Civilian Climate Corps; (H) rehabilitating and retrofitting our existing affordable housing stock to ensure safe, affordable, quality, energy-efficient homes, and supporting the development of new affordable housing and social housing to address the Nation’s housing crisis; (I) producing creative, scientific, artistic, or cultural works, which would then be made open and available for public use; and (J) supporting other projects that address public needs and can be implemented quickly; (5) job guarantee jobs would pay no less than $25 per hour, adjusted on a regular basis to ensure a rising standard of living, and would not replace any existing safety net programs or benefits, including unemployment insurance; (6) job guarantee jobs would also offer benefits, including— (A) health insurance consistent with that provided to existing Federal Government employees; (B) paid sick days and family leave; (C) retirement benefits; and (D) paid vacation; (7) job guarantee workers would— (A) be able to join public sector unions and bargain collectively for better working conditions and compensation; (B) be protected against discrimination and harassment by Federal labor laws; (C) have their data protected and their privacy respected; and (D) be empowered to develop lasting skills through on-the-job training, as well as paid apprenticeships, credentialing, and other career building opportunities; (8) job guarantee work would— (A) be made available— (i) on a full-time and part-time basis for adult residents age 18 and over, depending on worker needs, including those with involvement in the criminal legal system; (ii) on a part-time basis for young people ages 16 and 17; (iii) for short- or long-term periods, depending on worker needs; and (iv) to all people on a nondiscriminatory basis, including people with disabilities; (B) include outreach and recruitment, conducted in multiple languages; (C) provide workers and aspiring workers with support services, such as childcare and transportation assistance, and specific accommodations, as needed to access jobs and fulfill job responsibilities; and (D) meaningfully expand our social safety net and would not replace any existing safety net programs or benefits, including unemployment insurance; and (9) the job guarantee program would be administered by the Department of Labor and overseen by the Secretary of Labor in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, who would be responsible for dispersing funding, and in particular— (A) the Secretary of Labor would direct Treasury funds to local employment offices to manage job guarantee projects and match job seekers to projects, as well as cover any related capital and administrative costs, with funds targeted during the initial 3-year startup period to areas of greatest employment need; and (B) State, county, and local governments, as well as territories and Tribal Nations, would help administer the program, engaging residents in community assessments and participatory processes to identify job guarantee projects to go into a community job bank. ---