Overview

Title

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a Committee on Health as a standing committee of the House.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to create a new team in the House of Representatives that will be like doctors for laws, focusing on health and public health issues, but it’s not sure yet where they will get their money from or how they will work with other teams.

Summary AI

H. RES. 10 aims to change the rules of the House of Representatives to create a new standing committee called the Committee on Health. This committee will focus on biomedical research, healthcare supported by general revenues, and public health issues, including those handled by agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The resolution also makes changes to the jurisdiction of existing committees, specifically amending the roles of the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Energy and Commerce to accommodate this new committee.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hres10ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
372
Pages:
2
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 105
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 14
Entities: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.00
Average Sentence Length:
26.57
Token Entropy:
4.39
Readability (ARI):
13.60

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed resolution, H. RES. 10, seeks to amend the rules of the House of Representatives by establishing a new standing committee known as the Committee on Health. The primary objective of this committee would be to oversee topics related to biomedical research, healthcare funded by general revenues, and public health matters, such as quarantines. Furthermore, the bill adjusts the jurisdictions of existing committees, particularly the Committees on Education and the Workforce, and Energy and Commerce, to accommodate this new committee's responsibilities.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the main concerns with the proposed establishment of the Committee on Health lies in the lack of clarity regarding its funding and budgetary impact. There is no explicit mention of how the new committee will be financed, raising questions about additional expenditure and whether it might lead to potential financial inefficiencies.

Additionally, the bill might create overlapping jurisdictions with existing committees. For example, current committees such as the Energy and Commerce Committee already handle health-related issues, and the introduction of a new committee might complicate their responsibilities, causing potential inefficiencies in the legislative process.

Another issue is the vagueness in the exclusion clauses, where it mentions excluding veterans' hospitals and related care without adequately defining the scope. This opens up possibilities for jurisdictional disputes or legislative gaps regarding veterans' healthcare.

The bill also involves modifying and redesignating subparagraphs under existing committees, notably the Energy and Commerce Committee. Such changes might result in confusion about the committees' updated roles without a clear description of the new structure.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, the creation of a specialized Committee on Health could potentially lead to more focused and informed legislation regarding public health, biomedical research, and healthcare financing. This could contribute positively to improvements in national health standards and policies, which might lead to better healthcare access and quality over time.

However, the introduction of a new committee also entails potential risks of bureaucratic inefficiency. If overlaps or ambiguities in committee responsibilities are not adequately addressed, it might slow legislative progress, and crucial decisions regarding healthcare could become bogged down in administrative challenges.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders in the healthcare sector, such as biomedical researchers and public health officials, the Committee on Health could bring positive engagement opportunities. It might facilitate targeted dialogues and initiatives that cater reliably to their needs and concerns, leading to significant advancements in research and public health interventions.

Veterans might face uncertainty due to the lack of clarity concerning the exclusion of their healthcare matters from the committee's jurisdiction. This ambiguity could affect how effectively their healthcare issues are addressed in the legislative arena, potentially leaving them in a legislative gray area.

Existing committees, particularly the Energy and Commerce and Education and the Workforce committees, might experience role adjustments that could affect their influence and operational dynamics. It might require these committees to realign their focus and resources to maintain efficiency without the overlapping jurisdiction affecting their efficacy in legislative duties.

In summary, while H. RES. 10 aims to enhance the legislative handling of health-related issues, its potential impacts on spending, jurisdictional clarity, and inter-committee relationships require careful consideration and perhaps additional clarifications to avoid unintended negative outcomes.

Issues

  • The text does not specify the funding source or allocation for the Committee on Health, making it unclear how this will impact the budget and whether spending might be wasteful. (Section 2)

  • The establishment of the Committee on Health might create overlapping jurisdictions with existing committees, especially concerning health-related matters, leading to potential inefficiencies. (Section 2)

  • There is a lack of clarity on how the establishment of the Committee on Health will affect existing committees and their current responsibilities, which could complicate legislative processes. (Section 2)

  • The amendment mentions excluding veterans' hospitals, medical care, and treatment of veterans but does not clearly define the extent of this exclusion, potentially leaving ambiguity in the healthcare responsibilities. This could lead to jurisdictional disputes or legislative gaps. (Section 2)

  • The amendment to strike and redesignate subparagraphs in the Committee on Energy and Commerce might cause confusion about the specifics of its updated jurisdiction without explicit details on the new structure, complicating legislative accountability. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the resolution can be referred to as the "House Endeavor to Accelerate a Legislative Transformation of Healthcare Act" or simply the "HEALTH Act."

2. Establishment of Committee on Health Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section proposes changes to the House of Representatives' rules by establishing a new Committee on Health, which will focus on biomedical research, health care funded by general taxes, and public health issues like quarantine. It also makes related adjustments to the responsibilities of the Committees on Education and the Workforce, and Energy and Commerce, by clarifying jurisdiction over health insurance and reorganizing certain subparagraphs.