Overview
Title
To subject certain private funds to joint and several liability with respect to the liabilities of firms acquired and controlled by those funds, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
In a story where strange rules are written for how people who put money into businesses must be more honest and careful, this rule tries to stop money from being used in tricky ways that can hurt companies and workers. It says that the people controlling the money have to share the blame if something goes wrong, and also need to tell everyone exactly what they are doing with their money to make sure it’s fair.
Summary AI
H.R. 9985, known as the "Stop Wall Street Looting Act," aims to hold private investment funds accountable by imposing joint and several liability on these funds for the debts and liabilities of companies they control. The bill includes provisions to prevent private funds from financially harming companies, workers, and communities through excessive debt and asset stripping. Additionally, it mandates greater transparency for private funds, implements restrictions on securitizing risky corporate debts, and offers protections for workers impacted by company bankruptcies. The legislation seeks to protect workers, consumers, and investors while closing tax loopholes that have allowed some private investment managers to gain unfairly.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the “Stop Wall Street Looting Act”, aims to increase corporate accountability and protect workers and investors from the negative impacts of private equity firms’ business practices. The bill seeks to address issues such as asset stripping, excessive debt, and the lack of transparency often associated with private funds. It proposes several reforms, including imposing joint and several liabilities on controlling private funds for the liabilities of firms they acquire, restricting certain financial practices post-acquisition, protecting workers’ rights during bankruptcies, closing tax loopholes, and requiring more detailed disclosures from investment funds. The legislation also targets the securitization of risky corporate debt and aims to safeguard public funds.
Significant Issues
There are several significant issues associated with the bill. One concern is the imposition of joint and several liability on private funds, which could deter investment due to perceived increased risks. Additionally, the prohibition of indemnification could discourage investment if investors are unable to mitigate risks effectively. The bill also requires extensive new reporting from investment advisers, which could prove burdensome, especially for smaller firms. The restriction on post-acquisition payouts and outsourcing could limit the business strategies of firms, potentially affecting their financial outcomes. Furthermore, the surtax on certain payments from controlled firms might influence investment structuring, potentially affecting certain sectors adversely. The repeal of special tax treatment for REIT subsidiaries in healthcare without clear reasoning may introduce financial instability. Lastly, the strict executive compensation provisions in bankruptcy cases could hinder firms in retaining necessary leadership.
Impact on the Public
The bill could have broad implications for the American public. Its measures aim to protect workers and consumers from the negative fallout of bankruptcy and job losses stemming from private fund acquisitions. By increasing transparency and accountability, the legislation might also safeguard investors from potential abuses by private equity funds. However, by imposing several liabilities and restrictions, there might be a reduction in investments which could impact economic growth, affecting job creation and business activities indirectly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders, the bill presents both potential benefits and challenges. Workers could benefit from enhanced protections, both in terms of wage priority in bankruptcies and restrictions on company practices that might lead to job losses or worsening employment conditions. Investors, particularly those in pension funds that are tied to private equity investments, might see increased clarity and fairness in fund management due to new disclosure mandates.
However, private equity firms and investment advisers might face significant challenges. The increased liabilities, reporting requirements, and limitations on financial practices could lead to higher operational costs and reduced flexibility in managing investments. Health care properties associated with REITs might face financial instability due to repealed tax advantages. Finally, the investment environment could become more cautious, as stakeholders navigate the complexities and potential financial burdens imposed by this legislation. Given these varied impacts, the bill represents a substantial shift in regulatory oversight, affecting numerous facets of the investment landscape.
Financial Assessment
The "Stop Wall Street Looting Act" (H.R. 9985) is focused on reforming how private investment funds operate, especially in terms of their financial responsibilities and obligations. This commentary examines how the bill addresses financial references and spending, and how those points intersect with identified issues.
Joint and Several Liability
One of the most significant aspects of the bill is the joint and several liability imposed on private investment funds and their affiliates for the liabilities of acquired firms. This introduces a substantial financial burden on these entities, as they would be accountable for all debts incurred by firms under their control. As a result, this provision could discourage investment in certain firms, as investors may be wary of bearing excess liabilities, impacting investment activities significantly.
Financial Disclosure Requirements
The bill mandates detailed financial disclosure from private funds, requiring them to report items such as the total amount of regulatory assets under management, the total debt, and the specifics of any fees and expenses collected both from the target firms and limited partners. This can be financially burdensome for smaller firms, potentially affecting their competitiveness. The extensive reporting requirement may divert resources away from other business activities, aligning with the issue of smaller firms facing high costs.
Increased Priority for Wages in Bankruptcy
There is a notable financial shift in the bill regarding bankruptcy proceedings, where it increases the priority for unpaid wages—raising the cap from $10,000 to $20,000—and extends protections for severance pay and contributions to employee welfare benefits. This shift could increase the costs associated with managing bankruptcies, impacting creditor recoveries and potentially deterring financial institutions from lending, as highlighted in the issues section.
Limitations on Deductions and Surtax
The legislation also imposes a surtax on certain amounts received by investment firms, which could deter investments in target firms. By potentially raising the taxes involved in such investments, this provision may influence the structuring of deals or result in a decreased interest in investing in certain sectors. There is a risk that this surtax could have a chilling effect on investment activities, particularly in industries where private equity is a significant player.
Reporting on Political Expenditures
Private funds are required to report the total amount of expenditures for political activities, including any spending intended for the upcoming year, with a focus on expenditures exceeding $10,000. Such transparency is intended to provide investors and the public greater insight into how these funds influence political landscapes, though it may also impose additional financial and administrative burdens on the reporting entities.
Impact on REIT Tax Status and Executive Compensation
Finally, the bill eliminates certain tax benefits for REIT subsidiaries in the healthcare sector, which could make these entities less financially attractive and lead to instability without adequate stakeholder input. Moreover, the detailed rules concerning executive compensation during bankruptcy could make it difficult for firms to retain or attract senior management during financial distress—a concern directly related to maintaining leadership through challenging financial periods.
In summary, the provisions of this bill related to financial accountability, disclosure, and tax implications present significant changes that could reshape how private investment funds operate. These financial references indicate a legislative effort to increase transparency and accountability, albeit with some potential unintended consequences for investment behavior and competitiveness.
Issues
The provision of joint and several liability for controlling private funds and holders of active interests could impose substantial financial burdens on these entities, potentially affecting investment activity. This might deter investment in certain firms if investors feel they are exposed to excess liabilities. (Sections 101, 102)
The broad language of the anti-evasion section could lead to uncertainty and hinder legitimate business operations. The lack of specificity in what constitutes evasion may cause confusion and require additional legal interpretation. (Section 701)
The increase in priority for wages in bankruptcy could lead to increased costs in bankruptcy proceedings, affecting recoveries by other creditors. This shift could have significant repercussions on how bankruptcies are managed and may impact financial institutions' willingness to lend. (Section 301)
The prohibition against indemnification clauses as against public policy might create uncertainty and lead to challenges in attracting investment, as investors might be unwilling to bear the additional risk without recourse to indemnification. (Section 102)
The requirement for investment advisers to report extensive new data may be burdensome and costly, particularly for smaller firms. This requirement could detract from their resources and affect their competitiveness. (Section 501, 504)
The limitation on post-acquisition activities like dividends and outsourcing may limit the business decisions of firms, potentially impacting their financial performance and investor returns. (Section 201)
The surtax on certain payments received by investment firms could discourage investment in target firms or influence the structuring of investment deals, potentially having a chilling effect on investment in certain sectors. (Section 203)
The broad scope of fiduciary obligations and the prohibition against waiving these could impede investment flexibility and raise costs for funds managing ERISA-plan assets. (Section 502)
The repeal of special tax rules for REIT subsidiaries in healthcare without clear rationale or stakeholder input could introduce financial instability for those relying on REIT structures. (Section 207)
The complex provisions concerning executive compensation in bankruptcy could create challenges for firms to maintain leadership through difficult financial periods, potentially delaying recovery efforts. (Sections 304, 306)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The “Stop Wall Street Looting Act” is designed to enhance corporate responsibility and protect workers' rights. It includes measures against looting, such as restrictions on post-acquisition payouts, improving protections for workers during company bankruptcies, closing tax loopholes, ensuring investor protection, and imposing regulations on risky corporate debt.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress acknowledges the significant influence of private equity funds over many industries and communities, highlighting concerns about debt-laden practices harming companies and stakeholders, the obscured performance metrics of these funds, and the increased systemic risk from risky market debt. They stress the need for measures to protect workers, consumers, and investors, and to prevent private funds from exploiting viable companies for profit.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the bill, such as "affiliate," which refers to entities with significant control over another, and "capital distribution," which includes things like dividends and share buybacks. It also explains what constitutes a "change in control," identifies various roles like "control person" and "insider," and defines different types of financial entities and instruments such as "corporation," "private fund," and "security."
101. Joint and several liability for controlling private funds and holders of active interests in controlling private funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, Congress explains that both controlling private funds and those with an active interest in them are responsible for all of the financial obligations of any company they control, as well as any related companies. This includes debts, penalties, violations of worker-related laws, and unfunded pension liabilities.
102. Indemnification void as against public policy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it is declared that it goes against public policy for a target company or its affiliate to offer protection or reimbursement to a controlling private fund concerning the target company, its affiliates, or any person with an active interest in the fund, regarding their responsibilities under another section of the law.
201. Limitations on post-acquisition dividends, distributions, redemptions, buybacks, and outsourcing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, rules are set to limit how a company can pay out dividends, buy back shares, or outsource jobs after it's taken over by an investment fund, particularly for four years following the acquisition. If these rules are broken, the transactions are invalid, and the people responsible can be held liable and pay for legal fees if someone sues to reverse those actions.
202. Prevention of fraudulent transfers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines amendments to laws concerning fraudulent transfers, especially those related to change in control transactions as defined in the Stop Wall Street Looting Act. It introduces new rules for defining insolvency during such transactions, extends the time frame to reverse certain financial actions to 15 years, and enhances the oversight of committees over debtor actions and relationships with insiders.
203. Surtax on certain amounts received by investment firms from controlled target firms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a surtax on certain payments received by investment firms from firms they control. This surtax, calculated as a specific percentage of these payments, aims to prevent tax avoidance through complex financial arrangements, and the section also includes various amendments and clarifications to ensure its proper application.
59B. Surtax on certain amounts received by investment firms from controlled target firms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A surtax is imposed on investment firms when they receive certain payments from companies they control, where the amount of the tax depends on the highest tax rate applicable that year. The taxed payments exclude interest or property distributions and involve specific entities involved in raising or returning capital and dealing with securities or real estate.
204. Limitation on deduction for business interest of certain businesses owned by private funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the tax code prevent certain businesses owned by private funds from deducting as much interest on their taxes if they have a high ratio of debt to equity. Additionally, these businesses cannot choose certain tax options related to real estate, and any existing choices for these options will be canceled for future tax years.
205. Guardrails around accessing public funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section adds new rules to the Investment Company Act of 1940, requiring certain entities that receive government funds to publicly disclose details about the funds they got, like the total amount, how it was used, and employee information. For two years after receiving the funds, they are also prohibited from acquiring other companies or distributing profits to shareholders.
66. Disclosures Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In SEC. 66, entities that receive funds from federal or state agencies must publicly disclose various financial and operational details, such as total funds received, workforce demographics, loans, and the pay ratio between the CEO and the median employee. Additionally, they are prohibited from acquiring companies or distributing funds to shareholders for two years after receiving the funds.
206. Prohibiting payments from Federal health care programs to entities that sell assets to or use assets as collateral for a loan with a real estate investment trust Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits any person or organization from receiving payments from federal health care programs if they sell assets to or use assets as collateral for loans with a real estate investment trust (REIT), unless the agreement was made before this rule was enacted.
207. Repeal of special rule for taxable REIT subsidiaries with interests in certain health care property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals the special rules regarding taxable REIT subsidiaries that own certain healthcare properties by removing specific references to "qualified health care properties" in the Internal Revenue Code. These changes will take effect for taxable years starting after the law is enacted.
208. Elimination of qualified REIT dividends from qualified business income Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to remove qualified REIT dividends from the definition of qualified business income, and these changes will be effective for tax years starting after the law is enacted.
209. Protections for striking workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section amends the National Labor Relations Act to strengthen protections for workers involved in strikes. It prohibits actions like replacing, discriminating against, or locking out employees because of their participation in a strike, and outlines unfair practices related to coercing employees into employer campaign activities unrelated to their job.
301. Increased priority for wages Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, increases the priority amount for certain wages from $10,000 to $20,000 and changes the rules around severance pay, treating it as fully earned upon an employee's layoff or termination. Additionally, it modifies the calculation for employee benefits, allowing up to $20,000 per employee covered by a benefit plan.
Money References
- Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (B) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, by inserting “(A)” before “Fourth”; (C) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated— (i) by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$20,000”; (ii) by striking “within 180 days”; and (iii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(B) Severance pay described in subparagraph (A)(i) shall be deemed earned in full upon the layoff or termination of employment of the individual to whom the severance pay is owed.”; and (2) in paragraph (5)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking “within 180 days”; and (ii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first”; and (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: “(B) for each such plan, to the extent of the number of employees covered by each such plan multiplied by $20,000.”. ---
302. Priority for severance pay and contributions to employee welfare benefit plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to prioritize severance pay for employees who are laid off or terminated, ensuring it is considered fully earned at the time of layoff or termination, and mandates that specific contributions to employee welfare benefit plans must be honored following the filing of a bankruptcy petition.
303. Priority for violations of Federal and State laws Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends bankruptcy laws to prioritize paying any back pay, penalties, or damages owed for violations of labor laws. It also clarifies the calculation of days for notice violations related to worker adjustments and retraining notifications.
304. Limitation on executive compensation enhancements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies rules about executive pay in bankruptcy cases under Section 503(c) of the United States Code. It clarifies who is considered a senior executive or highly paid employee and sets stricter conditions that must be met, with clear evidence required, before any bonuses or incentives can be given.
305. Prohibition against special compensation payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 363 of title 11 of the United States Code prohibits approval of special payments or benefits to high-ranking employees or consultants of a debtor company if the company has stopped or reduced severance pay for regular employees within a year prior to filing for bankruptcy. Additionally, it requires court approval for certain financial transactions involving such payments.
306. Executive compensation upon exit from bankruptcy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the rules on executive compensation when a company exits bankruptcy, requiring court approval for payouts to senior executives and top-paid employees to ensure they are not excessive compared to regular employees. It also mandates that such compensation be reasonable compared to similar positions at other companies and fair considering any sacrifices made by regular employees.
307. Collateral surcharge for employee obligations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amended section of the law requires that if employees have not received owed wages, vacation pay, severance, or other compensation due to them after bankruptcy proceedings begin, these unpaid amounts are considered necessary costs tied to the property securing a loan. The trustee must recover these funds to pay the employees or the relevant welfare benefit plan, even if there was an agreement waiving these rights.
308. Voidability of preferential compensation transfers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, it is explained that a trustee has the power to reverse certain payments made to insiders of a company, like top executives or highly paid employees, if those payments were made under a special bonus plan set up before bankruptcy and don't meet specific legal standards. If the trustee doesn't take action, others can seek court approval to recover those payments for the benefit of the company's finances.
309. Protection for employees in a sale of assets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that when a court approves the sale or lease of a debtor's property, it must prioritize offers that preserve and maintain the jobs and employment conditions of the debtor's workforce. Furthermore, any buyer or lessee must inform the court about the impact of the transaction on employment and disclose any noncompliance with the terms, which the court can then address with appropriate measures.
310. Protection of gift card purchasers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to define a "gift card" as a prepaid promise, card, or code redeemable at a single merchant or affiliated merchants, and it updates bankruptcy law to allow individuals to claim up to $1,800 if money was deposited for undelivered goods, services, or unredeemed gift cards before a case begins.
Money References
- (a) Definition of gift card.—Section 101(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (26) the following: “(26A) The term ‘gift card’ means a paper or electronic promise, plastic card, or other payment code or device that is— “(A) redeemable at— “(i) a single merchant; or “(ii) an affiliated group of merchants that share the same name, mark, or logo; “(B) issued in a specified amount, regardless of whether that amount may be increased in value or reloaded at the request of the holder; “(C) purchased on a prepaid basis in exchange for payment; and “(D) honored by the single merchant or affiliated group of merchants described in subparagraph (A) upon presentation for goods or services.”. (b) Consumer deposit.—Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following: “(7) Seventh, allowed unsecured claims of individuals, to the extent of $1,800 for each such individual, arising from the deposit, before the commencement of the case, of money in connection with— “(A) the purchase, lease, or rental of property; “(B) the purchase of services, for the personal, family, or household use of such individuals, that were not delivered or provided; or “(C) the purchase of a gift card with respect to which funds exist that have not been redeemed.”. ---
311. Commercial real estate Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 311 of the bill modifies Section 365(d) of Title 11 in the United States Code. It removes paragraph 4 and renumbers the existing paragraph 5 to become the new paragraph 4.
401. Amendment of 1986 Code Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Whenever this law changes or removes a part of a section mentioned, it's referring to a part of the 1986 Internal Revenue Code, unless stated otherwise.
402. Partnership interests transferred in connection with performance of services Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes the rules for including the value of a partnership interest in a person's taxable income when they receive it for providing services. It states that the value is based on what the partner would get if the partnership sold all its assets and suggests automatic inclusion of this value in income, unless the person elects otherwise, with these changes applying to transfers made after the bill becomes law.
403. Special rules for partners providing investment management services to partnerships Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces new rules for partners providing investment management services to partnerships, treating certain partnership interests as regular income or loss instead of capital gains or losses, which affects how these partners are taxed. It outlines conditions under which these rules apply, describes related terms, and discusses exceptions and adjustments for specific capital interests, ensuring the alignment of these provisions with existing tax laws.
710. Special rules for partners providing investment management services to partnerships Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the rules and tax treatment for partners who provide investment management services to partnerships, specifically detailing how income, gain, and loss related to these services are recharacterized as ordinary income or loss. It defines terms such as "investment services partnership interest," describes how these interests are taxed upon disposition, and specifies exceptions and additional rules concerning qualified capital interests and related persons.
501. Disclosure of fees and returns Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require controlling private funds to disclose detailed information about their fees, assets, and activities each year, including their debt, performance, investors, political spending, workforce, and any federal support. This information will be made publicly available and periodically reviewed to ensure it stays current with market trends.
Money References
- “(5) In dollars, the total amount of regulatory assets under management by the fund.
- “(6) In dollars, the total amount of net assets under management by the fund.
- “(8) Information on the debt owed by the fund, including— “(A) the dollar amount of total debt; “(B) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is a financial institution in the United States; “(C) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is a financial institution outside of the United States; “(D) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is an entity that is located in the United States and is not a financial institution; and “(E) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is an entity that is located outside of the United States and is not a financial institution. “(9) The gross performance of the fund during the year covered by the report.
- “(18) The percentage of the equity of the fund that is owned by— “(A) citizens of the United States; “(B) individuals who are not citizens of the United States; “(C) brokers or dealers; “(D) insurance companies; “(E) investment companies that are registered with the Commission under this Act; “(F) private funds and other investment companies not required to be registered with the Commission; “(G) nonprofit organizations; “(H) pension plans maintained by State or local governments (or an agency or instrumentality of either); “(I) pension plans maintained by nongovernmental employers; “(J) State or municipal government entities; “(K) banking or thrift institutions; “(L) sovereign wealth funds; and “(M) other investors. “(19) The total dollar amount of aggregate fees and expenses collected by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties from target firms for which the fund is a controlling private fund, which shall— “(A) be categorized by the type of fee; and “(B) include a description of the purpose of the fees. “(20) The total dollar amount of aggregate fees and expenses collected by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties from the limited partners of the fund, which shall— “(A) be categorized by the type of fee; and “(B) include a description of the purpose of the fees. “(21) The total carried interest claimed by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties and the total dollar amount of carried interest distributed to the limited partners of the fund. “
- “(25) A description of any expenditure for political activities made during the year preceding the year in which the report is submitted, including— “(A) the date on which each such expenditure for political activities was made; “(B) the amount of each such expenditure for political activities; “(C) if such an expenditure for political activities was made in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate, the name of the candidate, the office sought by the candidate, and the political party affiliation of the candidate; “(D) a summary of— “(i) each such expenditure for political activities that is in amount that is not less than $10,000; and “(ii) each expenditure for political activities with respect to a particular election if the total amount of expenditures for political activities by the firm with respect to that election is in an amount that is not less than $10,000; “(E) a description of the specific nature of any expenditure for political activities that the firm intends to make for the year in which the report is submitted, to the extent that the specific nature is known to the firm; and “(F) the total amount of expenditures for political activities that the fund intends to make for the year in which the report is submitted. “(26) For the year preceding the year in which the report is submitted, the total amount of Federal support, if any, received by— “(A) the fund; and “(B) any entity with respect to which the fund is a beneficial owner, as that term is defined in section 5336(a)(3) of title 31, United States Code. “(27) Any other information that the Commission determines is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors. “(c) Periodic review.—The Commission shall, with respect to the rules issued under subsection (b)— “(1) review the rules once every 5 years; and “(2) revise the rules as necessary to ensure that the disclosures required under the rules reflect contemporary (as of the date on which the rules are revised) trends and characteristics with respect to private investment markets.
67. Disclosure of fees and returns Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules requiring a controlling private fund to provide detailed annual reports about its financial activities, such as assets, debts, fees, and political expenditures. It mandates public disclosure of these reports and includes periodic reviews to keep regulations up-to-date with changing market conditions.
Money References
- (b) Rules.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Commission shall issue final rules that require a controlling private fund to, using generally accepted accounting principles, annually report the following information with respect to that controlling private fund: (1) The name, address, and vintage year of the fund. (2) The name of each general partner of the fund. (3) The name of each limited partner of the fund. (4) A list of each entity with respect to which the fund owns an equity interest. (5) In dollars, the total amount of regulatory assets under management by the fund. (6) In dollars, the total amount of net assets under management by the fund. (7) The percentage of fund equity contributed by the general partners of the fund and the percentage of fund equity contributed by the limited partners of the fund. (8) Information on the debt owed by the fund, including— (A) the dollar amount of total debt; (B) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is a financial institution in the United States; (C) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is a financial institution outside of the United States; (D) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is an entity that is located in the United States and is not a financial institution; and (E) the percentage of debt for which the creditor is an entity that is located outside of the United States and is not a financial institution.
- (18) The percentage of the equity of the fund that is owned by— (A) citizens of the United States; (B) individuals who are not citizens of the United States; (C) brokers or dealers; (D) insurance companies; (E) investment companies that are registered with the Commission under this Act; (F) private funds and other investment companies not required to be registered with the Commission; (G) nonprofit organizations; (H) pension plans maintained by State or local governments (or an agency or instrumentality of either); (I) pension plans maintained by nongovernmental employers; (J) State or municipal government entities; (K) banking or thrift institutions; (L) sovereign wealth funds; and (M) other investors. (19) The total dollar amount of aggregate fees and expenses collected by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties from target firms for which the fund is a controlling private fund, which shall— (A) be categorized by the type of fee; and (B) include a description of the purpose of the fees. (20) The total dollar amount of aggregate fees and expenses collected by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties from the limited partners of the fund, which shall— (A) be categorized by the type of fee; and (B) include a description of the purpose of the fees. (21) The total carried interest claimed by the fund, the manager of the fund, or related parties and the total dollar amount of carried interest distributed to the limited partners of the fund. (22) A description of, during the year covered by the report, any material changes in risk factors at the fund level, including— (A) concentration risk; (B) foreign exchange risk; and (C) extra-financial risk, including environmental, social, and corporate governance risk. (23) Disclosures that satisfy the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures of the Financial Stability Board, as reported in June 2017. (24) A description of the human capital management practices of the fund, including— (A) fund workforce demographic information, including the number of full-time employees, the number of part-time employees, the number of contingent workers (including temporary and contract workers), and any policies or practices of the firm relating to subcontracting, outsourcing, and insourcing; (B) fund workforce composition, including data on the diversity of that workforce, including the racial and gender composition of that workforce, and any policies and audits relating to the diversity of that workforce; (C) any incident of alleged workplace harassment during the 5 years preceding the year in which the report is submitted; and (D) any health or safety incident during the 5 years preceding the year in which the report is submitted. (25) A description of any expenditure for political activities made during the year preceding the year in which the report is submitted, including— (A) the date on which each such expenditure for political activities was made; (B) the amount of each such expenditure for political activities; (C) if such an expenditure for political activities was made in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate, the name of the candidate, the office sought by the candidate, and the political party affiliation of the candidate; (D) a summary of— (i) each such expenditure for political activities that is in amount that is not less than $10,000; and (ii) each expenditure for political activities with respect to a particular election if the total amount of expenditures for political activities by the firm with respect to that election is in an amount that is not less than $10,000; (E) a description of the specific nature of any expenditure for political activities that the firm intends to make for the year in which the report is submitted, to the extent that the specific nature is known to the firm; and (F) the total amount of expenditures for political activities that the fund intends to make for the year in which the report is submitted. (26) For the year preceding the year in which the report is submitted, the total amount of Federal support, if any, received by— (A) the fund; and (B) any entity with respect to which the fund is a beneficial owner, as that term is defined in section 5336(a)(3) of title 31, United States Code. (27) Any other information that the Commission determines is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors. (c) Periodic review.—The Commission shall, with respect to the rules issued under subsection (b)— (1) review the rules once every 5 years; and (2) revise the rules as necessary to ensure that the disclosures required under the rules reflect contemporary (as of the date on which the rules are revised) trends and characteristics with respect to private investment markets.
502. Fiduciary obligations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates fiduciary responsibilities under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by including managers of private funds, prohibiting waivers of fiduciary duties, and ensuring that all limited partners in a controlling private fund receive equal terms or benefits.
503. Disclosures relating to the marketing of private equity funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Investment advisers who manage private funds must provide potential investors with detailed information about the other funds they manage, including the funds' investment status, performance, employee numbers, regulatory actions, and how they're sold or dissolved. They must also disclose any legal issues and the specific ways they divest from their investments.
504. Greater visibility into non-bank direct lending and private credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Commission to change its rules so that investment advisers must report quarterly about their private fund investments and loans. This must happen within 180 days after this Act becomes law.
601. Risk retention requirements for securitization of corporate debt Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act require managers of collateralized debt obligations to obtain and retain part of the credit risk for assets they do not currently hold. These managers must hold onto this risk either directly or through a fully owned affiliate, and any transfer of assets they initiate will be considered as transferred by them.
701. Anti-evasion Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes it illegal for anyone to intentionally avoid following any part of the Act by doing things like entering into agreements, making transactions, or creating business entities.
702. Severability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If any part of this Act is found to be invalid or unconstitutional, the rest of the Act will still stay in effect and continue to apply to everyone and every situation as intended.