Overview
Title
To prohibit the use, production, sale, importation, or exportation of any pesticide containing atrazine.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9981 is a plan to stop making or using a special bug and weed spray called atrazine because it can be very bad for plants, animals, and people. It's already banned in Europe, and now they want to do the same in the U.S. to keep everyone safer.
Summary AI
H.R. 9981 aims to ban the use, production, sale, importation, or exportation of pesticides containing atrazine in the United States. Atrazine is known for its harmful environmental impact and health risks, being linked to cancer, birth defects, and reproductive issues. The bill highlights that atrazine has been prohibited in the European Union due to its environmental persistence and toxicity. It proposes the cancellation of all atrazine registrations, prohibit further sale or use, and restrict future registrations of atrazine-based products.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Ban Atrazine Toxicants Act," aims to prohibit the use, production, sale, importation, or exportation of any pesticide containing atrazine within the United States. Atrazine, a widely used herbicide, has been linked to various environmental and health issues. The bill seeks to amend Section 6 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, mandating the immediate and permanent cancellation of atrazine's registration. Additionally, the legislation would revoke any tolerances that allow atrazine residues in food and prohibit any future registrations or sale of existing stocks of atrazine.
Significant Issues
One of the most significant issues with this legislation is the immediate and irreversible cancellation of atrazine registration without considering potential future scientific advancements that might address its safety concerns. This raises both legal and ethical questions about the inflexibility of the ban.
Moreover, the prohibition on the sale of existing stocks and the lack of guidance or support for industries and farmers currently relying on atrazine could lead to significant economic disruptions. These sectors might face logistical and financial challenges as they seek alternatives to this widely used herbicide. The absence of a transition plan or timeline exacerbates this issue, potentially impacting the stability of affected businesses.
Furthermore, the technical language used in Section 2 regarding atrazine's reproductive harms may not be easily understood by the general public, limiting informed public discourse on the bill. Clarity and accessibility could be improved to enhance understanding and engagement from all stakeholders.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the public might benefit from the health and environmental protections the bill aims to achieve by eliminating atrazine, a chemical linked to adverse effects on human health and wildlife. For communities with high exposures, including farmworkers and rural populations, the ban could reduce risks related to reproductive harm and cancer.
However, uncertainties about the cost implications for replacing atrazine in agricultural practices might indirectly affect consumers. If farmers face higher costs due to the ban, this could translate into increased food prices or changes in agricultural yields, as noted in the findings that suggest only a minimal decrease in corn yields.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the agricultural sector, particularly farmers who have relied heavily on atrazine for crop management, the bill represents a significant challenge. Without immediate access to viable alternatives, they might encounter increased operational costs or productivity issues, leading to economic strain.
Conversely, environmental and public health organizations are likely to view this legislation positively. By removing a chemical with documented environmental and health risks, the bill aligns with their goals of fostering sustainable and safe practices within the socio-economic landscape.
In summary, while the bill's intentions are directed toward a safer environment and public health, the path it charts lacks flexibility and preparation for economic ramifications on affected industries. Addressing these aspects with more strategic planning could enhance the bill's impact and acceptance among diverse stakeholders.
Issues
The immediate and permanent cancellation of atrazine as per Section 3 without room for further proceedings or reevaluation could disregard future scientific advances or studies justifying its potential safe use, raising both legal and ethical concerns.
The lack of provision in Section 3 for support or guidance to industries and farmers affected by the ban to find alternatives to atrazine might lead to significant economic disruptions, particularly in the agricultural sector.
The prohibition of the sale of existing atrazine stocks upon enactment, stated in Section 3, does not provide sufficient time for industries to adapt, potentially causing logistic and financial challenges.
Section 2 presents highly technical language on atrazine's reproductive harms which might not be accessible to the general public, potentially hindering informed public discourse on the bill.
Section 2 suggests a broad range of atrazine deposition amounts in the Gulf of Mexico without clarifying the potential uncertainty or variability in the data, impacting the perceived accuracy and reliability of the bill's findings.
The section on 'Short title' is very brief, offering no context or details about enforcement mechanisms or definitions, which leaves the purpose or scope ambiguous and might contribute to misunderstanding about the bill's aims.
The findings in Section 2 document adverse effects and uses of atrazine but do not include clear guidance or solutions, potentially leaving stakeholders uncertain about next steps and implications for compliance and enforcement.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it will be known as the "Ban Atrazine Toxicants Act."
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has identified several issues with the herbicide atrazine, noting its widespread use in the U.S., its persistent and widespread presence in the environment, and its adverse effects on human health and wildlife. Despite these concerns, studies suggest that banning atrazine may have minimal impact on corn yields.
3. Cancellation of registration of atrazine Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to permanently cancel the registration of atrazine, a pesticide, due to its harmful effects on humans. It also prohibits any new registrations, the sale or use of existing stocks, and revokes tolerances allowing its presence in food.