Overview
Title
An Act To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to conform to the intent of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, as set forth in the joint explanatory statement of the committee of conference accompanying Conference Report 105–599, that the National Taxpayer Advocate be able to hire and consult counsel as appropriate.
ELI5 AI
The National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025 is a new rule that says a special person who helps people with their taxes, called the National Taxpayer Advocate, can now have their own helpers who are lawyers. These lawyers can help the Advocate make better decisions and solve tax problems.
Summary AI
H. R. 997, known as the "National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill allows the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint counsel within their office and to have them report directly to the Advocate or a delegate. This change is intended to align with the original intent of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, ensuring that the Advocate can hire and consult legal counsel as needed to support their work.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This legislative proposal, titled the "National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025," aims to modify the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary goal is to allow the National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA) the authority to appoint legal counsel within the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. This adjustment is intended to align with the original intentions of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. Essentially, the amendment will enable the NTA to have direct legal support, enhancing the office's functionality and potentially improving its ability to advocate for taxpayers effectively.
Summary of Significant Issues
Centralization of Power: One of the main issues identified with this bill is the potential over-centralization of power within the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. By granting the NTA the ability to appoint counsel without clearly articulated criteria, there could be concerns regarding checks and balances.
Complex Language: The bill's amendments are written in a manner that may be challenging for individuals without a legal background to understand. This complexity could result in a lack of transparency and make it harder for the general public to fully grasp the implications of the legislative changes.
Lack of Transparency in Selection Process: The amendments do not specify how counsel is selected, which could lead to concerns about favoritism or biases in appointments.
Unclear Impact and Necessity: The importance and expected impact of this legislative change are not explicitly stated, generating questions about its need and effectiveness.
Financial Concerns: While the bill does not specify any particular spending, the lack of detailed oversight in appointing counsel could raise financial concerns, particularly about the potential for unwarranted resource allocation.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact: For the general public, especially taxpayers, the bill's success could mean more robust representation through the Taxpayer Advocate's Office. However, the opaque language and process might generate skepticism or confusion about how these changes serve them.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders: - National Taxpayer Advocate Office: The NTA's office may benefit from this increased authority by enabling quicker and potentially more efficient legal decisions directly influencing its operations. This improvement could enhance taxpayer support and advocacy.
Legal Professionals: For attorneys, especially those with an interest in tax law, this amendment could create new opportunities within the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. However, the process for appointment remains undefined, which could lead to unease among legal professionals about entering this governmental role.
Policymakers and Oversight Bodies: These stakeholders might express concerns regarding the lack of checks and balances if the appointment process is not transparent enough. Moreover, effective oversight will be crucial to ensuring that this authority is executed fairly and without bias.
In conclusion, while the "National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025" aims to enhance the functioning of the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate, it raises significant issues regarding transparency, accountability, and clarity. These concerns highlight the importance of balancing additional powers with proper oversight and clear communication to ensure public trust and effective governance.
Issues
The amendment centralizes power within the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate, allowing the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint counsel without clearly defined selection criteria. This centralization might raise concerns about checks and balances, and the potential for favoritism or lack of oversight. (Section 2)
The language used in the amendments might be considered complex and difficult to immediately understand by individuals who are not experts in legal or legislative wording. This complexity could hinder the accessibility and comprehension of the legislation by the general public and stakeholders. (Section 2)
The amendment does not specify criteria for appointing counsel, which could lead to a lack of transparency in the selection process. Without clear guidelines, there might be concerns about how selections are made and potential biases. (Section 2)
The impact or necessity of this legislative change is not immediately clear from the text, which might cause confusion among stakeholders and observers regarding the intended effectiveness or purpose of the amendment. This lack of clarity could lead to questions about the amendment's overall benefit. (Section 2)
The section does not specify any particular spending, making it difficult to identify potential for wasteful spending directly. However, the allocation of resources without detailed oversight might still raise financial concerns in implementation. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill specifies that the official short title of the legislation is the “National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025.”
2. Authority of Taxpayer Advocate to appoint counsel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the Internal Revenue Code allow the Taxpayer Advocate to hire lawyers who will directly report to them. It also updates previous language to reflect this change and states that the amendments will be applied as if they were enacted in 1998.