Overview
Title
To protect election workers and polling places.
ELI5 AI
The "Election Worker and Polling Place Protection Act," or H. R. 9968, is a law that helps keep people who work at voting places safe and makes sure nobody tries to scare them or break things where you go to vote. If someone does these bad things, they can be fined money or even go to jail for up to one year.
Summary AI
H. R. 9968, known as the “Election Worker and Polling Place Protection Act,” aims to enhance protections for election workers and polling places in the United States. The bill proposes amendments to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, specifically making it a crime to interfere with, intimidate, or damage election-related individuals and properties. Offenders could face fines up to $5,000 and imprisonment for up to one year, especially if their actions result in bodily harm or involve dangerous weapons. Additionally, federal prosecution of these offenses would require a certification from the Attorney General that it is necessary due to jurisdictional or public interest considerations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 9968, titled the "Election Worker and Polling Place Protection Act," proposes amendments to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It is primarily aimed at safeguarding election workers and polling places from interference and intimidation. The bill seeks to make it a federal offense, punishable by fines and imprisonment, for anyone to use force, threats, or violence to interfere with individuals voting, working at polls, or helping in election processes. Additionally, it extends these protections to physical properties used in elections, like polling places and tabulation centers, by imposing penalties for any willful damage aimed at disrupting election operations. For the federal government to prosecute under these provisions, the Attorney General's certification is required to ensure jurisdiction and public interest.
Significant Issues
Several issues have been identified in the bill. The terms "de minimus damage" and "threat of de minimus damage" are not clearly defined, posing a risk of inconsistent interpretations and enforcement. The language "whether or not acting under color of law" is quite broad and might cover a wide spectrum of scenarios without specific contexts, raising potential concerns about overreach. Moreover, the procedural necessity of the Attorney General's certification for prosecutions could result in delays, particularly in urgent election-related situations. The prescribed fines and imprisonment durations appear relatively low, potentially undermining the deterrent effect of these penalties on individuals contemplating election-related crimes. Lastly, the bill lacks explicit mechanisms to ensure uniform enforcement of these penalties across various jurisdictions, which could lead to uneven application and effectiveness.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill holds the potential to reinforce the integrity of the electoral process by establishing federal protections for those involved in election administration. This could enhance public confidence in the security and fairness of elections. However, the vagueness in terms and the procedural hurdles present concerns about how effectively these protections can be uniformly applied and interpreted. If not addressed, these issues could lead to challenges in enforcement and legal ambiguities, perhaps diminishing the intended protective measures' effectiveness.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For election workers and officials, this bill could offer a greater sense of security and support, which is crucial given the rising concerns about threats and intimidation in recent election cycles. This additional protection could encourage more people to participate as poll workers or officials, which is vital for conducting smooth and secure elections.
Conversely, civil liberties groups might view the ambiguous language used in the bill as a cause for concern regarding potential overreach. Without clear definitions and limits, there could be apprehension about potential misuse or misapplication of these provisions, adversely affecting individuals' rights.
Finally, federal law enforcement and the Department of Justice might face challenges due to the additional procedural steps required for prosecution, potentially hindering effective enforcement and timely responses to violations.
Overall, while the intent of the bill is to strengthen election security, addressing its issues is crucial to ensuring it achieves this goal without unintended negative consequences.
Financial Assessment
The "Election Worker and Polling Place Protection Act," also known as H. R. 9968, makes specific financial references related to penalties for illegal activities that interfere with election processes. Although no direct spending or financial appropriations are included in the bill, it is crucial to examine how the bill assigns monetary fines for specific offenses and how these financial elements interact with identified issues.
Financial Penalties
Fines and Imprisonment Terms
The bill imposes fines as a punitive measure for anyone caught interfering with or intimidating election workers or causing damage to election-related properties. The bill sets penalties at different levels, primarily dependent on the severity of the offense:
- A standard fine of not more than $2,500 and imprisonment for up to six months for willful interference, intimidation, or property damage related to election processes.
- If the conduct results in bodily injury or involves dangerous weapons, explosives, or fire, the fine increases to not more than $5,000, with imprisonment up to one year.
Relation to Identified Issues
Penalties as Deterrents
One of the issues highlighted is whether the proposed fines and imprisonment terms are adequately robust to deter potential offenders. Considering the potential ramifications on the election process's integrity, some may argue that these financial penalties, especially the baseline fine of $2,500, may not serve as a strong enough deterrent. This might lessen their effectiveness in preventing interference and intimidation, undermining the act's primary objectives.
Uneven Enforcement Concerns
Another issue is the potential variability in enforcement across different jurisdictions. While fines and imprisonment provide a clear financial framework for penalties, the lack of measures ensuring consistent application could lead to unequal enforcement. Such inconsistencies could arise from differences in how local jurisdictions implement federal guidelines, possibly leading to perceptions of inequity.
Jurisdictional and Procedural Considerations
A notable procedural aspect is the requirement of certification from the Attorney General or a designee to pursue federal prosecutions. While this does not involve direct financial allocation, it may indirectly affect how promptly financial penalties are applied. Delays in certification could prolong the period before offenders face fines, reducing the efficiency and timeliness of the penalties as deterrents.
In summary, while H. R. 9968 provides a financial penalty structure as part of its measures to protect election workers and infrastructure, the adequacy of these fines as deterrents and the consistency of their enforcement remain critical points of consideration.
Issues
The definitions of 'de minimus damage' and 'threat of de minimus damage' in Section 2 are not clearly articulated, which might result in varied interpretations and enforcement inconsistencies, leading to potential legal challenges.
The language 'whether or not acting under color of law' in Section 2 is ambiguous and overly broad, potentially covering a wide range of individuals and actions without specifying particular contexts, which could raise concerns about overreach and misuse, impacting civil liberties.
The procedural requirement for the Attorney General's certification before prosecution in Section 2, subsection (g), may lead to delays in the initiation of prosecutions, especially in urgent situations related to election interference.
The thresholds for fines and imprisonment in Section 2 are relatively low compared to the potential impact of crimes on election integrity, which might not be a strong enough deterrent to prevent interference and intimidation in elections.
There is no mention in Section 2 of measures to ensure prompt and consistent enforcement of penalties across jurisdictions, which could result in uneven application of the law and undermine its effectiveness in protecting election workers and polling places.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes its short title, officially naming it the "Election Worker and Polling Place Protection Act."
2. Prohibition on interference and intimidation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Voting Rights Act to make it illegal for anyone to use force or threats to interfere with or intimidate people voting, working at polls, or assisting elections. Violators can be fined up to $2,500 or jailed for up to six months, with harsher penalties if someone gets hurt or a weapon is involved. It also protects election properties from damage and requires the Attorney General to approve any federal prosecution under this section.
Money References
- Section 11 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. 10307) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(f)(1)(A) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force, or by violence or threat of violence to any person or property, willfully interferes with or attempts to interfere with, the ability of any person or any class of persons to vote or qualify to vote, or to qualify or act as a poll watcher or as any legally authorized election official, in any primary, special, or general election, or any person who is, or is employed by, an agent, contractor, or vendor of a legally authorized election official assisting in the administration of any primary, special, or general election to assist in that administration, shall be fined not more than $2,500, or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
- “(B) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force, or by violence or threat of violence to any person or property, willfully intimidates or attempts to intimidate, any person or any class of persons seeking to vote or qualify to vote, or to qualify or act as a poll watcher or as any legally authorized election official, in any primary, special, or general election, or any person who is, or is employed by, an agent, contractor, or vendor of a legally authorized election official assisting in the administration of any primary, special, or general election, shall be fined not more than $2,500, or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
- “(C) If bodily injury results from an act committed in violation of this paragraph or if such act includes the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, an explosive, or fire, then, in lieu of the remedy described in subparagraph (A) or (B), the violator shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
- “(2)(A) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully physically damages or threatens to physically damage any physical property being used as a polling place or tabulation center or other election infrastructure, with the intent to interfere with the administration of a primary, general, or special election or the tabulation or certification of votes for such an election, shall be fined not more than $2,500, or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
- “(B) If bodily injury results from an act committed in violation of this paragraph or if such act includes the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, an explosive, or fire, then, in lieu of the remedy described in subparagraph (A), the violator shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.