Overview

Title

To award 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men’s Ice Hockey Team, in recognition of their extraordinary achievement at the 1980 Winter Olympics where, being comprised of amateur collegiate players, they defeated the dominant Soviet hockey team in the historic Miracle on Ice, revitalizing American morale at the height of the Cold War, inspiring generations and transforming the sport of hockey in the United States.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 9950 wants to give special gold medals to the U.S. Men's Ice Hockey Team from 1980 to celebrate their big win against a strong team from another country. These medals will be shown in museums, and more of these medals made of bronze can be sold to help pay for them.

Summary AI

H. R. 9950 proposes awarding three Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men’s Ice Hockey Team. This recognition honors their legendary victory over the Soviet Union, known as the "Miracle on Ice," which lifted American spirits during the Cold War and significantly influenced the popularity of hockey in the U.S. The medals will be displayed at the Lake Placid Olympic Center, the United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum. Additionally, the bill allows for the creation and sale of duplicate medals in bronze to help cover costs.

Published

2024-10-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-10-08
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9950ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
1,523
Pages:
7
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 540
Verbs: 93
Adjectives: 67
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 70
Entities: 208

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.90
Average Sentence Length:
44.79
Token Entropy:
5.17
Readability (ARI):
22.73

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 9950, titled the "Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act," proposes awarding three Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. This team achieved a significant victory over the Soviet Union at the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, famously dubbed the "Miracle on Ice." The bill recognizes their extraordinary achievement, which not only uplifted American morale during a tense period of the Cold War but also sparked an increased interest in hockey across the United States. In addition to awarding medals, the bill permits the sale of duplicate bronze medals with proceeds benefiting the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

Significant Issues

Several issues emerge with this bill. First, it does not specify the financial source or cost for crafting the gold medals, nor does it establish a spending limit from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund. This lack of clarity could result in unmonitored government spending, raising financial accountability concerns. The bill also gives the Secretary of the Treasury unilateral control over the design of these medals, lacking checks and balances usually expected in government processes.

Additionally, there is an absence of defined procedures regarding how the medals will be presented, potentially causing ambiguity. A related concern is the absence of oversight or controls on the production and distribution of bronze duplicates, which could result in unnecessary expenditures or overproduction.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill highlights a celebrated historical sports achievement and serves as a tribute to an event that has resonated with American pride and the growth of hockey as a popular sport. By recognizing and commemorating the 1980 team, the legislation attempts to inspire future generations while celebrating a significant moment in sports history.

However, by not providing transparency and limits regarding the costs and processes involved, there is a risk of taxpayer funds being used inefficiently. The public may have concerns if government spending seems not to be clearly justified or well-managed.

Impact on Stakeholders

For the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team members, the provision of Congressional Gold Medals is a prestigious acknowledgment, celebrating their game-changing achievement. For hockey organizations and museums like the Lake Placid Olympic Center, United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum, receiving and displaying these medals may boost visitorship and public interest in their historical collections.

However, stakeholders associated with the financial governance of the U.S. Mint might view the broad authorization to use funds without clear boundaries as a cause for concern, necessitating tighter regulations to prevent potential misuse or waste. They might also be scrutinized for ensuring that the financial aspects related to the medals' production and sale are transparent and accountable.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to celebrate a historic sporting victory and its positive influence on American culture, its implementation requires careful consideration of financial and procedural clarity to ensure broad public support and responsible handling of resources.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the cost or funding source for striking the Congressional Gold Medals, leading to potential unaccounted government spending, which is particularly significant for taxpayers and financial accountability. (Section 3, Section 5)

  • The authorization to use the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund without specifying any spending limits or caps could result in unbounded and potentially wasteful expenditures. This raises significant financial scrutiny risks. (Section 6)

  • The process and criteria for determining 'appropriate' arrangements for the presentation of gold medals are not specified, leading to potential ambiguity and confusion in managing the awards. (Section 3)

  • There is no explicit oversight or accountability measures regarding the production and distribution of the medals, which could lead to inefficient use of resources. This is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability. (Section 5)

  • The use of broad language to authorize spending from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund could allow for unnecessary expenditures, raising concerns about financial governance. (Section 6)

  • The decision-making authority given solely to the Secretary of the Treasury for the design of the medals, without any oversight or input, could be seen as lacking checks and balances, which is important for ensuring fair and democratic processes. (Section 3)

  • The provision does not specify a clear limit or guideline on how many duplicate bronze medals can be struck and sold, leaving open the potential for overproduction, which could impact financial oversight and market saturation. (Section 4)

  • The bill mentions the sale of duplicate bronze medals but does not clarify who the intended purchasers are or the rationale behind these sales, leading to potential misunderstandings about the necessity and market expectation. (Section 4)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be officially referred to as the "Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act."

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines Congress's recognition of the 1980 USA Olympic men's hockey team's remarkable achievements, including their victory over the Soviet Union, winning the gold medal, and the positive impact on American hockey interest and participation. It highlights the historical context of the victory during a tense time in U.S. history and underscores the team's lasting influence on the sport.

3. Congressional gold medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section permits Congress to present three gold medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team for their remarkable victory at the Winter Games, with the medals to be displayed at three locations: the Lake Placid Olympic Center, the United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum. The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for the design and creation of the medals.

4. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is allowed to make and sell bronze copies of the gold medals mentioned in section 3. The sales price must be enough to cover all related costs like labor, materials, and other expenses.

5. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The medals created under this Act are recognized as national medals according to U.S. law, and they are also categorized as collectible items for legal purposes related to coins and currency.

6. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section gives permission to use money from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs of making medals. Additionally, any money earned from selling duplicate bronze medals will go back into the same fund.