Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to carry out a program under which all Federal funds for elementary and secondary education are provided directly to parents of eligible children or approved by parents for distribution to schools, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9926, called the School Freedom Act of 2024, wants to give money from the government directly to moms and dads so they can use it to pay for their kids' school, and if there's money left, it can be used later or saved until the kid is a grown-up.
Summary AI
H.R. 9926, also known as the School Freedom Act of 2024, proposes a program where federal funds for elementary and secondary education are given directly to parents of eligible children. This act aims to terminate existing federal education programs by June 30, 2025, and reallocates those funds into individual "School Freedom Accounts." Parents can use these accounts to pay for various educational expenses, whether their children attend public or private schools. Funds not used can roll over for future educational expenses or convert into a fund for higher education or technical training, with unused amounts returning to the U.S. Treasury once the student turns 30.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, named the "School Freedom Act of 2024," seeks to reform how federal education funds are distributed in the United States. Rather than allocating these funds to federal elementary and secondary education programs, the bill aims to redirect them directly to parents through the establishment of "School Freedom Accounts" for each eligible child. These accounts will give parents two options: use the funds for various educational expenses or approve the funds for disbursement to public schools their children attend. The bill stipulates the termination of existing federal education programs by June 30, 2025, with any remaining funds supporting this new program.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the major issues with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the term "covered Federal education program," which could lead to confusion about which existing programs will be terminated. Moreover, the definition of "eligible child" is not clearly specified, potentially leading to disputes over who can qualify for the new funding mechanism.
A significant concern is the lack of oversight for the expenditure from these accounts, as there is no requirement for preapproval or tracking of how the funds are spent. The exclusion of these funds from taxable income might have broader implications for federal tax policy and fairness in distributing public resources.
Additionally, the wide range of allowable educational expenses could result in significant funds being diverted from public schools, potentially increasing educational inequality. This lack of accountability measures heightens the risk of fraud or misuse of the funds.
Impact on the Public
The public stands to be impacted broadly by this shift in how federal funds are distributed for education. By placing more control in the hands of parents, there's potential for increased customization in educational experiences to fit individual children's needs. However, this could come at the cost of reducing resources available for public schools, which might struggle with decreased funding and, consequently, face difficulties in providing quality education.
The ability to convert unused K-12 education funds into a source for higher education expenses could benefit students who choose this path, yet it may not align with the primary intent of the federal funds, which is focused on pre-college education.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Parents and Students: Parents may appreciate the flexibility and control over educational funds, using them to tailor their children's educational experiences. Students could benefit in environments where the funding allows for access to resources that better meet their educational needs.
Public Schools and Teachers: Public schools might experience a negative impact due to potential reductions in funding, which could lead to larger class sizes, cutbacks on resources, and challenges in maintaining quality education. Teachers might face increased challenges to deliver quality education with diminished resources.
Private Educational Institutions: These institutions could see a positive impact, as a portion of the federal funds might be redirected towards private tuition, enhancing their financial resources.
Government and Policy Makers: The bill could set a precedent for similar funding models in other sectors, potentially altering the landscape of federal funding distribution. However, without strong oversight measures, there is a risk of inefficiencies or misuses of funds, drawing scrutiny and possible resistance from various stakeholders concerned about equity and accountability.
Overall, while the bill intends to empower parental choice in education, it poses substantial challenges in maintaining equity and accountability within the education system, and its broader implications require careful consideration to avoid exacerbating existing inequalities.
Issues
The ambiguity in the definition of 'covered Federal education program' in Section 2 could lead to confusion about which programs are affected by the termination, raising concerns about misinterpretation and inconsistent implementation.
The lack of criteria or guidelines in Section 2 for the Secretary of Education to determine the termination date by June 30, 2025, leaves room for arbitrary decision-making, which could lead to litigation or disputes.
Section 3 does not clearly define 'eligible child,' leading to potential disputes over who qualifies for a School Freedom Account, which is crucial for equitable distribution of educational funds.
The absence of preapproval and oversight measures for expenditures from School Freedom Accounts in Section 3 could lead to misuse or misallocation of funds, impacting fiscal responsibility and accountability.
The lack of clarity and regulatory prohibition in Section 6 may lead to inadequate oversight, which could hinder effective use of funds and limit timely responses to emerging issues in the program's implementation.
The exclusion of funds from taxable income in Section 3 might lead to broader implications on tax policy and equity, which could be controversial and raise ethical questions about fairness and distribution of public resources.
The broad range of allowable expenses under Section 3 could lead to significant funds being redirected away from public schools, potentially exacerbating educational inequality.
The lack of oversight or specific accountability measures for the funds allocated, as noted in Section 5, raises concerns about effective monitoring of fund usage, increasing the risk of fraud or misallocation.
The program's extension for use beyond K-12 education, as described in Section 3, could potentially misalign the intended use of federal educational funds, affecting the financial stability of future educational funding.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this law will be known as the "School Freedom Act of 2024."
2. Termination of Federal elementary and secondary education programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each Federal education program covered by this section will end no later than June 30, 2025, as determined by the Secretary of Education. After the programs end, any remaining funds that were not used must be redirected to support the School Freedom Account program.
3. School Freedom Account program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The School Freedom Account program, starting from July 1, 2025, allows the U.S. Treasury Secretary to set up accounts for eligible children where funds equal to the Federal per-pupil expenditure are deposited. Parents can use these funds for various educational costs if their child doesn't attend a public school, or approve fund disbursement to their child's public school, with any leftover funds rolling over for future educational expenses or converting into a fund for higher education until the child turns 30, after which remaining funds return to the Treasury.
4. Tracking of Federal education funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Treasury is required to determine the total amount of money deposited into School Freedom Accounts each year, listing it by local educational agency and state. Additionally, they must specify how much of that money goes directly to parents and how much is given to the agency based on parental approval.
5. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this Act does not change any rules or conditions for private, religious, or home education providers. It also clarifies that these providers can still receive funds from a School Freedom Account without having to change their beliefs, practices, or policies.
6. Prohibition on new regulation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the Secretary of the Treasury is not allowed to create any new rules or take actions that would restrict or place conditions on how a parent or eligible child can use a School Freedom Account or a Higher Education and Skills Obtainment Fund.
7. GAO reporting on School Freedom Account and Higher Education and Skills Obtainment Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Comptroller General of the United States to report annually to Congress about various aspects of the School Freedom Account and Higher Education and Skills Obtainment Fund. The report will cover topics like how funds are being managed and used for educational purposes, changes in fund allocations, and the tracking and conversion of accounts, aiming to evaluate and possibly improve these education programs.
8. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section lays out definitions for terms used throughout the Act, including "career and technical education" as defined by a previous education act, and definitions for common terms like "child" and "State" according to another education law. It also explains terms like "cost of attendance," "covered Federal education program," "eligible child," and "institution of higher education," referencing specific sections of existing U.S. laws for their meanings.