Overview

Title

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish standard practices for a grant or pilot program administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs through the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9924 wants to help by making sure that when the Veterans Health group tries new ways to help veterans with their feelings, they have clear plans and share what happens, kind of like how teachers share report cards to show how kids are doing in school.

Summary AI

H.R. 9924 is a proposed law aiming to establish standard practices for grant or pilot programs related to suicide prevention or mental health, managed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs through the Veterans Health Administration. The bill requires the creation of measurable objectives and the development of evaluation methods for these programs. It also mandates communication of objectives and findings to relevant parties and sharing of results at the program's conclusion. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is given 180 days from the enactment of this bill to set and apply these practices, regardless of when the program starts.

Published

2024-10-04
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-10-04
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9924ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
685
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 194
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 22
Entities: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.16
Average Sentence Length:
45.67
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
24.18

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The bill titled "What Works for Preventing Veteran Suicide Act" proposes amendments to Title 38 of the United States Code. Its primary aim is to standardize the practices for grant and pilot programs related to suicide prevention and mental health that are administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs through the Veterans Health Administration. The legislation emphasizes the importance of establishing clear objectives, creating evaluation measures, and sharing results with relevant entities.

Significant Issues

One of the main issues identified in the bill is the lack of specificity and clarity regarding the regulations for establishing these standard practices. This could lead to implementation challenges, making it difficult for the programs to effectively target veteran suicide prevention. Additionally, the absence of accountability measures or audits in the bill may result in inefficient resource use, posing a risk of not achieving program objectives.

Another area of concern is the undefined process for selecting the "relevant" entities with whom program information and results will be shared. This lack of definition raises the possibility of favoritism or biased distribution of information. Furthermore, the complex language of the bill could hinder the understanding and involvement of broader stakeholder communities not familiar with bureaucratic processes. Lastly, the bill's timeline for prescribing regulations lacks interim deadlines, which could delay the implementation and effectiveness of the programs.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to address a significant public health issue by developing more effective suicide prevention strategies targeting veterans. Should it succeed in establishing practical and effective guidelines, the bill could improve mental health outcomes for veterans, ultimately benefiting public health.

However, without clear regulations and accountability measures, there is a risk that taxpayer money may not be spent effectively, which could lead to public concern over government spending and resource allocation. Ensuring clarity and transparency in the process is crucial to maintaining public trust and support.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For veterans, this bill has the potential for a significant positive impact by enhancing suicide prevention efforts and improving mental health support through better-structured programs. However, veterans could be negatively impacted if the standards and objectives are unclear or inconsistently implemented, leading to ineffective programs.

For organizations involved in veteran services, the bill represents an opportunity to contribute to and benefit from more organized and evidence-based practices. However, these organizations might face challenges if they are not deemed "relevant" entities, which could limit their access to important information and involvement in program development.

Policy makers and administrators within the Veterans Health Administration may find the bill beneficial as it aims to create more coherent and evaluable structures for program implementation. Nevertheless, without detailed guidelines and deadlines, they could encounter difficulties in rolling out effective suicide prevention programs within the intended timeframe.

Overall, while the intentions behind the "What Works for Preventing Veteran Suicide Act" are commendable, successful implementation will require addressing the identified gaps and concerns to ensure it delivers meaningful outcomes for veterans and the broader community.

Issues

  • The lack of specificity and clarity in the regulations to establish standard practices for grant or pilot programs under the Veterans Health Administration could lead to ambiguity in implementation, making it difficult to ensure that the programs effectively address veteran suicide prevention. (Section 2)

  • The absence of accountability measures or audits in the bill to ensure compliance with the established standard practices may result in inefficient use of resources or failure to achieve program objectives. This could lead to ineffective spending of taxpayer money. (Section 2)

  • The criteria or process for selecting 'relevant' entities with whom program objectives and results are communicated is not defined, which may lead to potential favoritism or biased dissemination of information. (Section 2)

  • The language of the regulations and programs is complex and may hinder understanding by stakeholders unfamiliar with bureaucratic processes, potentially limiting input and engagement from broader communities. (Section 2)

  • The 180-day timeline for prescribing regulations lacks interim steps or deadlines, potentially delaying implementation and impacting the timely effectiveness of suicide prevention programs for veterans. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act provides its official title, which is the “What Works for Preventing Veteran Suicide Act”.

2. Establishment of standard practices for a grant or pilot program administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs through the Veterans Health Administration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs must develop standard practices for grant or pilot programs related to suicide prevention or mental health within the Veterans Health Administration. These practices involve setting objectives, creating evaluation plans, sharing information with relevant entities, and conducting program evaluations.