Overview
Title
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for transparency and oversight of third-party beneficiaries in civil actions.
ELI5 AI
In simple terms, this bill wants to make sure everyone knows who else might gain from a court case, like if someone would get money if one side wins, except for regular loans or lawyer fees. It's like making sure all the other people who might get a prize in a game are known.
Summary AI
H.R. 9922, titled the "Litigation Transparency Act of 2024," aims to ensure openness in civil court cases by requiring parties involved to disclose any third-party beneficiaries who stand to gain from the case's outcome. If someone other than the lawyers could get money or other benefits depending on the result, their identity and relevant agreements must be shared with the court and other parties. However, this rule does not apply to simple loan repayments, specific interest-bearing loans, or attorney fee reimbursements. The requirements are set to apply to all civil cases active or started after the law's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Litigation Transparency Act of 2024," aims to bring greater transparency and oversight to civil lawsuits by mandating the disclosure of any third-party beneficiaries. Third-party beneficiaries are individuals or entities that have a stake in the outcome of a lawsuit, typically through some form of financial interest. Specifically, the bill seeks to amend title 28 of the United States Code to require parties involved in a civil case to reveal the identities of these beneficiaries and provide details related to their potential financial interests. Notably, the bill includes exceptions for standard loan repayments, certain interest payments, and attorney’s fees.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill introduces several potential concerns that could affect its implementation and impact:
Complexity of the Language: The wording used to mandate disclosures of third-party contingent rights might be difficult for individuals without legal expertise. The lack of clarity could make compliance challenging and hinder the intended transparency in civil litigation processes.
Exceptions That May Obscure Transparency: The clause that exempts repayments of loans and attorney's fees from disclosure requirements could weaken the bill's transparency goals. This provision may allow some financial interests related to a case to remain undisclosed, potentially obscuring conflicts of interest.
Ambiguity in Timing Requirements: The bill specifies that disclosures must be made at a certain time, but the language ("not later than the later of") might cause confusion. Clear timelines are crucial for enforcement and could directly impact the ability of all parties involved to comply effectively.
Lack of Enforcement Measures: There is currently no outlined enforcement mechanism for ensuring compliance with the disclosure requirements, nor are there penalties for failing to update information in a timely manner. This omission could undermine the bill's effectiveness in ensuring accountability.
Broad Definitions: The phrase "any person" used in relation to third-party beneficiaries may be interpreted inconsistently, potentially leading to variable application of the bill across different cases and contexts.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, this legislation is designed to foster trust in the legal process by making civil litigation more transparent and ensuring that all parties with a stake in a lawsuit are properly disclosed. Increased openness can deter misuse of the legal system and ensure more equitable outcomes in civil cases. However, the bill's complexities and exceptions could limit its effectiveness, potentially leading to situations where critical information remains hidden, thus perpetuating skepticism about fairness in the legal system.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Legal Practitioners and Parties in Lawsuits: Lawyers and litigants will need to navigate the bill's disclosure requirements. The potential complexity in the language may require additional resources and time to ensure compliance, which could increase litigation costs and affect legal strategies.
Third-Party Funders and Financial Institutions: Entities that finance litigation or have an interest in the outcomes of lawsuits may face new hurdles in terms of transparency and disclosure obligations. The exceptions for loan repayments and attorney's fees may benefit these stakeholders by limiting their disclosure requirements.
Judiciary: Judges and courts may have to interpret and enforce this new legislation. The lack of specificity in terms such as "timely manner" could lead to inconsistent rulings and place additional burdens on the judicial system to clarify and apply the law uniformly.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance transparency in civil cases, its effectiveness hinges on addressing ambiguities and enforcement shortcomings that currently exist within its framework.
Issues
The language regarding the disclosure of contingent rights in Section 1660(a) is complex and might hinder understanding for those without legal expertise. This issue could have significant legal implications as it may affect the transparency of civil litigations involving third-party beneficiaries.
Section 1660(b) includes an exception clause that might undermine transparency by excluding disclosure for parties who have a right to receive payment solely for loan repayment or attorney's fees. This exception may obscure potential conflicts of interest in civil cases, raising ethical and legal concerns.
The timing clause in Section 1660(c) may lead to ambiguity in disclosure timing due to the phrase "not later than the later of," potentially complicating legal proceedings and affecting the enforcement of correct and timely disclosures.
The duty to correct disclosures in Section 1660(d) lacks enforcement measures or consequences for non-compliance, which could lead to issues with adherence and accountability in legal processes.
The broad interpretation of "any person" in Section 1660(a)(1) could lead to differing interpretations about who qualifies as a third-party beneficiary, impacting the uniform application of this legislation across different legal contexts.
The bill does not clearly define terms such as 'in a timely manner' (Section 1660(d)), which may lead to inconsistent enforcement and varying judicial interpretations, potentially undermining the bill's purpose of transparency and oversight.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be referred to as the "Litigation Transparency Act of 2024."
2. Transparency and oversight of third-party beneficiaries in civil cases Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires parties or their lawyers in civil cases to disclose to the court and other parties the identity of anyone entitled to payments based on the case's outcome, unless the payments are for loan repayments or attorney's fees. The disclosures should be made within 10 days of the agreement or when the case is filed, and they must be updated if they become inaccurate.
1660. Third-party beneficiary disclosure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, parties involved in a civil lawsuit must disclose any third parties who will receive payment depending on the lawsuit's outcome and provide related agreements. Exceptions exist for regular loan repayments, reasonable interest, and attorney’s fees. These disclosures must be updated promptly if circumstances change or as ordered by the court.
3. Applicability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The changes introduced by this Act will affect any civil lawsuits that are currently underway or that start after the Act becomes law.