Overview
Title
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to provide that any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation shall include costs relating to servicing the public debt, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 991 wants to make sure that when the government figures out what it will do with its money, it also thinks about the costs of paying back borrowed money. This is like remembering to count how much money you owe when deciding how to spend your allowance.
Summary AI
H. R. 991, also known as the “Cost Estimates Improvement Act,” seeks to amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. The bill requires that any estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) or the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) should include the costs associated with servicing the public debt. The purpose is to ensure that when the government prepares financial projections, they consider the impact of these projections on the national debt. This legislation emphasizes the importance of accounting for debt servicing costs in government budget estimates.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H. R. 991, known as the "Cost Estimates Improvement Act," aims to amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. The proposed amendment requires the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) to include costs associated with servicing the public debt in their estimates. This means that whenever these organizations prepare financial forecasts or budgetary estimates, they must, whenever possible, account for the interest payments on the national debt.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is its mandate for including debt servicing costs in budget estimates, which may introduce complexities due to dependence on fluctuating interest rates and borrowing levels. The unpredictable nature of these variables poses a challenge in achieving precise financial predictions. Furthermore, the bill uses the term "to the extent practicable," a vague phrase that could lead to inconsistencies among analysts as they interpret the bill differently.
Another major concern is the lack of a clear definition or methodology for calculating "debt servicing costs." This absence could result in divergent interpretations, potentially impacting the uniformity and reliability of the estimates. Additionally, the bill does not address how these added considerations might influence legislative decision-making or budgetary outcomes.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill could increase transparency regarding the true cost of government spending by revealing how much money is needed to service national debt. By integrating these figures into financial estimates, citizens might gain a clearer picture of the budgetary implications of legislation, potentially influencing public opinion and voter decisions.
However, the inherent complexity and potential inaccuracies introduced by the bill can lead the public to question the reliability of government financial projections. Misestimations may also affect public trust in fiscal policies and economic planning, as government projections might not accurately reflect future scenarios.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Economists and Financial Analysts: This group may face increased challenges due to the need for factoring in costs related to debt servicing, which requires robust models to predict interest rates and borrowing levels. The lack of clarity in the bill regarding methodologies could lead to a lack of consensus, complicating analyses further.
Policymakers: Legislators might encounter difficulties using these estimates due to varying levels of accuracy, impacting their decision-making processes. The ambiguity in terms of interpretation and calculation methods might lead to debates and delays in legislative proceedings.
Taxpayers: While the inclusion of debt servicing costs can provide taxpayers with a more comprehensive view of fiscal policies' implications, any miscalculation or vagueness might lead to skepticism about government financial management.
Government Agencies: Agencies responsible for producing these estimates will need to develop new frameworks to incorporate debt servicing costs, potentially requiring additional resources and expertise to meet the bill's demands.
Overall, while the intent of the bill is to provide a more complete financial picture by including debt servicing costs, the challenges associated with its implementation cast uncertainty over its effectiveness and impact.
Issues
The amendment to include debt servicing costs in estimates could lead to complexities in calculating accurate figures, especially as it depends on future interest rates and borrowing levels which can be unpredictable. This could have significant political and financial impacts. (Section 2, Section 403)
The phrase 'to the extent practicable' is vague and could lead to inconsistencies in how estimates are prepared by different analysts within the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation. This ambiguity might result in political and legal challenges. (Section 2, Section 403)
There is no clear definition provided for what qualifies as 'debt servicing costs,' which might lead to differing interpretations and lack of uniformity in the estimates. This could affect financial accuracy and lead to potential legal disputes. (Section 2, Section 403)
The amendment does not specify the methodology or criteria for calculating these debt servicing costs, leading to potential variations in estimations and inaccuracies, impacting financial decisions and legislative outcomes. (Section 2, Section 403)
The language used does not address potential concerns related to how these additional considerations in estimates might affect legislative decision-making or budgetary outcomes, potentially leading to both political and financial implications. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title for the legislation, which can be referred to as the “Cost Estimates Improvement Act”.
2. CBO and JCT estimates to include debt servicing costs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces an amendment to the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, requiring that estimates prepared by the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation include the costs associated with servicing the public debt, when possible. The amendment also updates the table of contents of the Act to reflect this change.
403. Estimates to include debt servicing costs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires that whenever the Director of the Congressional Budget Office or the Joint Committee on Taxation prepares an estimate, they must also try to include the costs of paying interest on the public debt.